@article { author = {Eldh, Ann Catrine and Wallin, Lars}, title = {How Single Is “Single” - Some Pragmatic Reflections on Single Versus Multifaceted Interventions to Facilitate Implementation; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multifaceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”}, journal = {International Journal of Health Policy and Management}, volume = {4}, number = {10}, pages = {699-701}, year = {2015}, publisher = {Kerman University of Medical Sciences}, issn = {2322-5939}, eissn = {2322-5939}, doi = {10.15171/ijhpm.2015.133}, abstract = {An earlier overview of systematic reviews and a subsequent editorial on single-component versus multifaceted interventions to promote knowledge translation (KT) highlight complex issues in implementation science. In this supplemented commentary, further aspects are in focus; we propose examples from (KT) studies probing the issue of single interventions. A main point is that defining what is a single and what is a multifaceted intervention can be ambiguous, depending on how the intervention is conceived. Further, we suggest additional perspectives in terms of strategies to facilitate implementation. More specifically, we argue for a need to depict not only what activities are done in implementation interventions, but to unpack functions in particular contexts, in order to support the progress of implementation science.}, keywords = {Facilitation,Implementation,Knowledge Translation (KT),Multifaceted Interventions,Single Interventions}, url = {https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3061.html}, eprint = {https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3061_fffadd5c469e83591dfb5db2fc044925.pdf} }