Globalization as a Driver or Bottleneck for Sustainable Development: Some Empirical, Cross-National Reflections on Basic Issues of International Health Policy and Management

Document Type: Original Article

Author

Department of Political Science, Innsbruck University, Innsbruck, Austria; Corvinus University, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

Background
This article looks at the long-term, structural determinants of environmental and public health performance in the world system.
 
Methods
In multiple standard ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models, we tested the effects of 26 standard predictor variables, including the ‘four freedoms’ of goods, capital, labour and services, on the following indicators of sustainable development and public health: avoiding net trade of ecological footprint global hectare (gha) per person; avoiding high carbon emissions per million US dollars GDP; avoiding high CO2 per capita (gha/cap); avoiding high ecological footprint per capita; avoiding becoming victim of natural disasters; a good performance on the Environmental Performance Index (EPI); a good performance on the Happy Life Years (HLYs) scale; and a good performance on the Happy Planet Index (HPI).
 
Results
Our research showed that the apprehensions of quantitative research, critical of neo-liberal globalization, are fully vindicated by the significant negative environmental and public health effects of the foreign savings rate. High foreign savings are indeed a driver of global footprint, and are a blockade against a satisfactory HPI performance. The new international division of labour is one of the prime drivers of high CO2 per capita emissions. Multinational Corporation (MNC) penetration, the master variable of most quantitative dependency theories, blocks EPI and several other socially important processes. Worker remittances have a significant positive effect on the HPI, and HLYs.
 
Conclusion
We re-analysed the solid macro-political and macro-sociological evidence on a global scale, published in the world’s leading peer-reviewed social science, ecological and public health journals, which seem to indicate that there are contradictions between unfettered globalization and unconstrained world economic openness and sustainable development and public health development. We suggest that there seems to be a strong interaction between ‘transnational capitalist penetration’ and ‘environmental and public health degradation’. Global policy-making finally should dare to take the globalization-critical organizations of ‘civil society’ seriously. This conclusion not only holds for the countries of the developed “West”, but also, increasingly, for the growing democracy and civil society movements around the globe, in countries as diverse as Brazil, Russia, China, or ever larger parts of the Muslim world.

Keywords


Additional File (download)

1. Jorgenson AK. Consumption and Environmental Degradation: A Cross-National Analysis of the Ecological Footprint. Soc Probl 2003; 50: 374–94. doi: 10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.374

2. Jorgenson AK. Global Inequality, Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality. Soc Sci J 2004; 41; 279–88. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2004.01.008

3. Jorgenson AK. Unpacking International Power and the Ecological Footprints of Nations: A Quantitative Cross-National Study. Sociol Perspect 2005; 48: 383–402. doi: 10.1525/sop.2005.48.3.383

4. Jorgenson AK. Global Warming and the Neglected Greenhouse Gas: A Cross-National Study of the Social Causes of Methane Emissions Intensity, 1995. Social Forces 2006; 84: 1779–98. doi: 10.1353/sof.2006.0050

5. Rodrik D. Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A Review of the World Bank’s Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. J Econ Lit 2006; 44: 973–87. doi: 10.1257/jel.44.4.973

6. Rodrik D, Subramanian A, Trebbi F. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 2004; 9: 131-65.doi: 10.3386/w9305

7. Tausch A, Ghymers C. From the Washington towards a Vienna Consensus? A quantitative analysis on globalization, development and global governance. Hauppauge: Nova Science; 2007.

8. Gwartney JD, Lawson RA, Holcombe RG. Economic freedom and the environment for growth. J Inst Theor Econ 1999; 155: 643–63.

9. Cropper ML, Oates WE. Environmental Economics – A Survey. J Econ Lit 1992; 30: 675–740.

10. Guger A, Marterbauer M, Walterskirchen E. Growth Policy in the Spirit of Steindl and Kalecki. WIFO Working papers, 240, 2004. [cited 2013 June 24]. Available from: http://ewald.walterskirchen.wifo.ac.at/

11. Kalecki M. Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy 1933-1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1971.

12. Steindl J. Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1952. doi: 10.2307/1907446

13. Steindl J. Economic Papers 1941-88. Basingstoke: MacMillan; 1990.

14. Cardoso FH. Development under Fire. Mexico D.F.: Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales, DEE/D/24 i, May (Mexico 20 D.F., Apartado 85 - 025); 1979.

15. Jorgenson AK. Uneven Processes and Environmental Degradation in the World-Economy. Human Ecology Review 2004; 11: 103–17.

16. Jorgenson AK. Unequal Ecological Exchange and Environmental Degradation: A Theoretical Proposition and Cross-National Study of Deforestation, 1990-2000. Rural Sociol 2006; 71: 685–712. doi: 10.1526/003601106781262016

17. Jorgenson AK. Does foreign investment harm the air we breathe and the water we drink? A cross-national study of carbon dioxide emissions and organic water pollution in less-developed countries, 1975 to 2000. Organization & Environment 2007; 20: 135–57. doi: 10.1177/1086026607302153

18. Jorgenson AK. Foreign Direct Investment and Pesticide Use Intensity in Less-Developed Countries: A Quantitative Investigation. Soc Nat Resour 2007; 20: 73–83. doi: 10.1080/08941920600982866

19. Jorgenson AK. Structural Integration and the Trees: An Analysis of Deforestation in Less-Developed Countries, 1990-2005. Sociol Q 2008; 49: 503–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00126.x

20. Jorgenson AK. Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, the Mitigating Influence of Institutional and Civil Society Factors, and Relationships Between Industrial Pollution and Human Health. Organization & Environment 2009; 22: 135–57. doi: 10.1177/1086026609338163

21. Jorgenson AK. Political-Economic Integration, Industrial Pollution and Human Health A Panel Study of Less-Developed Countries, 1980-2000. Int Sociol 2009; 24: 115–43. doi: 10.1177/0268580908099156

22. Jorgenson AK. The Sociology of Unequal Exchange in Ecological Context: A Panel Study of Lower-Income Countries, 1975-2000. Sociol Forum (Randolph N J) 2009; 24: 22–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.01085.x  

23. Jorgenson AK. The Transnational Organization of Production, the Scale of Degradation, and Ecoefficiency: A Study of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Less-Developed Countries. Human Ecology Review 2009; 16: 64–74.

24. Jorgenson AK, Burns TJ. Globalization, the Environment, and Infant Mortality: A Cross National Study. Humboldt J Soc Relat 2004; 28: 7–52.

25. Jorgenson AK, Burns TJ. The political-economic causes of change in the ecological footprints of nations, 1991-2001: A quantitative investigation. Soc Sci Res 2007; 36: 834–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.06.003

26. Jorgenson AK, Clark B. The Economy, Military, and Ecologically Unequal Exchange Relationships in Comparative Perspective: A Panel Study of the Ecological Footprints of Nations, 1975-2000. Soc Probl 2009; 56: 621–46. doi: 10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.621

27. Jorgenson AK, Kuykendall KA. Globalization, Foreign Investment Dependence and Agriculture Production: Pesticide and Fertilizer Use in Less-developed Countries, 1990-2000. Social Forces 2008; 87: 529–60. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0064

28. Jorgenson AK, Austin K, Dick C. Ecologically Unequal Exchange and the Resource Consumption/Environmental Degradation Paradox. Int J Comp Sociol 2009; 50: 263–84. doi: 10.1177/0020715209105142

29. Jorgenson AK, Dick C, Mahutga MC. Foreign investment dependence and the environment: An ecostructural approach. Soc Probl 2007; 54: 371–94. doi: 10.1525/sp.2007.54.3.371

30. Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Crenshaw EM, Jenkins JC. Deforestation and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Cross-National Investigation of Intervening Mechanisms. Soc Sci Q 2002; 83: 226–43. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00080

31. Herkenrath M, Bornschier V. Transnational Corporations in World Development—Still the Same Harmful Effects in an Increasingly Globalized World Economy? Journal of World-Systems Research 2003; ix: 105–39.

32. Herkenrath M, Koenig C, Scholtz H, Volken T. Convergence and Divergence in the Contemporary World System: An Introduction. Int J Comp Sociol 2005; 46: 363–82.

33. Heshmati A, Tausch A. Roadmap to Bangalore? Globalization, the EUs Lisbon Process and the Structures of Global Inequality. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers; 2007.

34. Tausch A, Heshmati A. Re-Orient? Understanding Contemporary Shifts in the Global Political Economy. Journal of Globalization Studies 2011; 2: 89–128.

35. Bornschier V, Chase-Dunn CK. Transnational Corporations and Underdevelopment. New York: Praeger; 1985. doi: 10.1177/000169938703000111

36. Froebel F. The new international division of labour: structural unemployment in industrialised countries and industrialisation in developing countries. 1th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980. doi: 10.1177/03058298790080030811  

37. Rondinelli DA. Export processing zones and economic development in Asia. A review and reassessment of a means of promoting growth and jobs. Am J Econ Sociol 1987; 46: 89–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1987.tb01766.x

38. Ross RJS. Slaves to Fashion. Poverty and Abuse in the New Sweatshops. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2004. doi: 10.1353/jsh.2006.0074

39. Singa Boyenge JP, International Labour Office, Sectoral Activities Programme. ILO database on export processing zones (Revised).Geneva: ILO; 2007.

40. Kohler G, Tausch A. Global Keynesianism: unequal exchange and global exploitation. Huntington, New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2001.

41. Balassa B. The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal. J Polit Econ 1964; 72: 584–96. doi: 10.1086/258965

42. Samuelson, P. Theoretical Notes on Trade Problems. Rev Econ Stat 1964; 46: 145–54.

43. Hatton TJ, Williamson JA. Vanishing Third World Emigrants? Nber Working Paper Series 2009. [cited 2013 June 24]. Available from: http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/williamson/jwilliamworkingpapers.

44. Sanderson M. International Migration and Human Development in Destination Countries: A Cross-National Analysis of Less-Developed Countries, 1970-2005. Soc Indic Res 2010; 96: 59–83. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9467-0

45. Ziesemer THW. Worker Remittances and Growth: The Physical and Human Capital Channels. Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik 2009; 229: 743–73.

46. Taylor JE. The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. Int Migr 1999; 37: 63–88. doi: 10.1111/1468-2435.00066

 

47. Taylor JE. International Migration and Economic Development: 2006. International symposium on international migration and development, Turin, Italy, 28-30 June 2006. [cited 2013 June 24]. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/migration/turin/Symposium_Turin_files/P09_SYMP_Taylor.pdf

48. UNDP, Statistics of the Human Development Report (UNDP Human Devel- opment Report Offic, New York, 2009). [updated 2009 July 1; cited 2013 June 24]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/

49. Online data analysis. [cited 2010 September 20]. Available from:

http://www.wvsevsdb.com/wvs/WVSAnalize.jsp

50. De Haan J, Lundstrom S, Sturm JE. Market oriented institutions and policies and economic growth: a critical survey. J Econ Surv 2006; 20: 157–91. doi: 10.1111/j.0950-0804.2006.00278.x

51. Dollar D. Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth 1992; 7: 195–225. doi: 10.1093/0199268657.003.0002

52. Dollar D. Outward-oriented developing countries really do grow more rapidly. Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985. Econ Dev Cult Change 1992; 40: 523–44. doi: 10.1086/451959

53. Hamid A. Military Expenditures and Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Global Data. Defence and Peace Economics 2007; 18: 519–35. doi: 10.1080/10242690701331501

54. Laver M, Shepsle KA. Understanding Government Survival: Empirical Exploration or Analytical Models? Br J Polit Sci 1999; 29: 395–401. doi: 10.1017/s0007123499210174

55. Levine RE, Renelt D. Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. Am Econ Rev 1992; 82: 942–63. 10.3386/w6252

56. Sala-i-Martin X. I Just Ran Two Million Regressions. Am Econ Rev 1997; 87: 178–83. doi: 10.3386/w6252

57. Sala-i-Martin X, Doppelhofer G, Miller RI. Determinants of Long-Term Growth: A Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates (BACE) Approach. Am Econ Rev 2004; 94: 813–35. doi: 10.1257/0002828042002570

58. Tausch A. 41 Indicators of Development. 2011. [updated 2010 July 24; cited 2013 June 24]. Available from http://www.hichemkaroui.com/?p=2017

59. Durlauf SN, Kourtellos A, Tan CM. Are any Growth Theories Robust? Econ J 2008; 118: 329–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02123.x

60. Barro RJ. Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics 2003; 159: 350–86.

61. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X. Economic Growth. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003.

62. Barro RJ. Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 1991; 106: 407–43. doi: 10.2307/2937943

63. Barro RJ. Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1996; 1: 1–27. doi: 10.1007/bf00163340

64. Barro RJ. 1st ed. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-country Empirical Study. Lionel Robbins Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.

65. Dietz T, Rosa EA, York R. Driving the human ecological footprint. Front Ecol Environ 2007; 5: 13–8. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[13:dthef]2.0.co;2

66. Dietz T, Rosa EA, York R. Environmentally Efficient Well-Being: Rethinking Sustainability as the Relationship between Human Well-being and Environmental Impact. Human Ecology Review 2009; 16: 114–23.

67. Veenhoven R. Happy Life-expectancy. A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Soc Indic Res 1996; 39: 1–58. doi: 10.1007/bf00300831

68. York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T. Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. Am Sociol Rev 2003; 68: 279–300. doi: 10.2307/1519769

69. Tausch A. The City on a Hill? The Latin Americanization of Europe and the Lost Competition with the U.S.A. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers; 2007.

70. Tausch A. Multicultural Europe: Effects of the Global Lisbon Process. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers: 2008.

71. Tausch A. Titanic 2010? The European Union and its failed ‘Lisbon strategy’. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers: 2009.

72. Tausch A. Towards a Global Tolerance Index. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Monthly Report, 1: 9–12. Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw); 2009.

73. Tausch A. [Euro-Islam. Myth or Reality? A quantitative analysis based on the ‘World Values Survey’ data]. Evropa 2009; 26: 121–51.

74. Tausch A. Globalisation and development: the relevance of classical “dependency” theory for the world today. Int Soc Sci J 2010; 61: 467-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01786.x

75. Tausch A. Life expectancy, infant mortality and inequality—once again. BMJ 2010; 339: b4320.

76. Tausch A. Passive Globalization and the Failure of the European Union’s Lisbon Strategy, 2000-2010: Some New Cross-National Evidence. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 2010; 9: 1–91.

77. Tausch A. Paul Boccara’s analysis of global capitalism. the return of the Bourbons, and the breakdown of the Brussels / Paris neo-liberal consensus. Entelequia. Revista Interdisciplinar 2010; 12: 105–47. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1726316  

78. Tausch A. The European Union’s failed ‘Lisbon strategy’. Society and Economy 2010; 32: 103–21. doi: 10.1556/socec.32.2010.1.8  

79. Tausch A. Towards an Index of global tolerance: a quantitative analysis, based on the ‘World Values Survey’ data. Islamic Perspective Journal 2010; 4: 263–79.

80. Tausch A. Towards yet another age of creative destruction? Journal of Globalization Studies 2010; 1: 104–30

81. Tausch A. [Globalization and unemployment. Empirical reflections from the world-system theory perspective]. Rev. Ciencias Sociales 2010; 128-129: 71–86.

82. Tausch A. In praise of inequality? ‘Happy Planet’ performance and its determinants. Aust N Z J Public Health 2011; 35: 572–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00785.x

83. Tausch A. Is globalization a driver of economic growth and social development? A cross-national, quantitative perspective on current, pro-globalist strategies of the European Union. Society and Economy 2011; 33: 505–24. doi: 10.1556/socec.33.2011.3.4

84.Tausch A. On The Global Political And Economic Environment Of The Current Al-Jazeera Revolution. Middle East Studies Online Journal 2011; 2.

85.Tausch A. [Geostrategic considerations on Kondratiev cycles, globalization and war]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia 2012; 10: 105–14.

86.Tausch A. A globalization-oriented perspective on health, inequality and socio-economic development. Int J Health Plann Manage 2012; 27: 2–33. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1090

87. Tausch A. The ‘Four Economic Freedoms’ and Life Quality. General Tendencies and Some Hard Lessons for EU-27 Europe. Journal of Globalization Studies 2012; 2: 79-97. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1924133

88.Tausch A. Global values – new reflections and new data on an old debate. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Monthly Report 2013; 2/13: 12-8.

89. Tausch A. Inequality, migration, and ‘smart’ survival performance. Social Evolution and History 2013; 12.

90.Tausch A, Heshmati A. Learning from dependency and world system theory: explaining Europe’s failure in the ‘Lisbon Process’. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 2010; 9: 3-90.

91. Tausch A, Heshmati A. Migration, Openness and the Global Preconditions of ‘Smart Development. Bogaziçi Journal Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies 2012; 26: 27-89.

92. Tausch A, Heshmati A. The Effects of Multinational Corporation (MNC) Penetration on the Global Political Economy. A Re-analysis of a Recurrent Sociological Proposition with Contemporary Data. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review 2012; 44: 1-40.

93. Tausch A, Heshmati A. Labour Migration and “Smart Public Health”. History and Mathematics 2013.

94. Tausch A, Heshmati A. Worker Remittances and the Global Preconditions of ‘Smart Development. Society and Economy 2013; 35: 25-50. doi: 10.1556/socec.2012.0008

95. Tausch A, Karoui H. Les Musulmans: Un cauchemar ou une force pour l’Europe? Paris: L’Harmattan; 2011.

96. Tausch A, Moaddel M. What 1.3 billion Muslims really think. An answer to a recent Gallup study, based on the ‘World Values Survey’. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers ; 2009.

97. Tausch A, Bischof C, Müller KH. Muslim Calvinism: internal security and the Lisbon process in Europe. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers; 2010.

98. Tausch A, Heshmati A, Jourdon P, Hichem K. [Are we still in the age of silent surrender?] Entelequia. Revista Interdisciplinar 2013; 15: 125-151.

99. Tausch A, Heshmati A, Bajalan CSJ. Measurement and Analysis of Child Well-Being in Middle and High Income Countries. The European Journal of Comparative Economics 2009; 5: 227-286.

100. Tausch A, Heshmati A, Brand U. Globalization, the Human Condition and Sustainable Development in the 21st Century Cross-national Perspectives and European Implications. London, New York and Delhi: Anthem Press; 2012. doi: 10.7135/upo9780857286550

101. Wissen M, Hirsch J, Brand U, Christopher G. Conflicts in environmental regulation and the internationalisation of the state: contested terrains. London: Routledge; 2008. doi: 10.4324/9780203928509