Equity in the Utilization of Healthcare Services in India: Evidence from National Sample Survey

Document Type: Original Article

Author

Centre for Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Health Systems Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai, India

Abstract

Background
The pursuit of equity in health and healthcare has been the key feature of health policy in India. However, despite the policy significance, the volume of literature available on this issue is scarce. Therefore, this paper is an attempt to examine the horizontal inequities in healthcare utilization, consisting of outpatient and inpatient care in 15 major states and north-eastern region of India.
 
Methods
Cross-sectional data were taken from the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) 60th round (2004), the survey on ‘morbidity and healthcare’. While outpatient care was assessed using the probability of outpatient visit 15 days prior to the survey date, the indicators of inpatient care utilization were based on the following variables: the probability of hospital admission and length of stay in hospital over a 12-month period. All these measures of healthcare utilization were standardized for need differences and controlled for socio-economic factors. Need standardized concentration indices were used to measure interstate and intrastate income-related inequities in healthcare utilization.
 
Results
Absolute inequalities were found between states in the proportion of the population reporting a visit to an outpatient provider, in the range of 4.42% to 21.72%. Similarly, inpatient care varied from 1% to 10%. The magnitude of inequity for both outpatient and inpatient care was pro-rich across rural and urban areas of India and in majority of the states. In fact, in majority of the states, the horizontal inequity across types of curative care was noticeably higher within the rural population than in the urban population. The analysis demonstrated that high per capita government health spending was significantly associated with low inequity in utilization of inpatient care.
 
Conclusion
The study concludes that it would be necessary to address the prevailing inequities in healthcare by substantially scaling up the public spending on health, and achieving effective universal coverage of healthcare in India.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 

  1. Bhore J, Amesur R, Banerjee A. Report of the Health Survey and Development Committee. Delhi: Government of India; 1946.
  2. Government of India. Draft National Health Bill. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2009. doi: 10.2307/3342263
  3. Zhou Z, Su Y, Gao J, Campbell B, Zhu Z, Xu L, et al. Assessing equity of healthcare utilization in rural China: results from nationally representative surveys from 1993 to 2008. Int J Equity Health 2013; 12: 34. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-34
  4. Frenz P, Delgado I, Kaufman JS, Harper S. Achieving effective universal health coverage with equity: evidence from Chile. Health Policy Plan 2013; forthcoming. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt054
  5. Yiengprugsawan V, Carmichael G, Lim LY, Seubsman S, Sleigh A. Explanation of inequality in utilisation of ambulatory care before and after universal health insurance in Thailand. Health Policy Plan 2011; 26: 105–14. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq028
  6. Son HH. Equity in health and healthcare in the Philippines [internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.adb.org/publications/equity-health-and-health-care-philippines
  7. Mills A, Ataguba JE, Akazili J, Borghi J, Garshong B, Makawia S, et al. Equity in financing and use of healthcare in South Africa, Ghana and Tanzania: Implications for Paths to Universal Health Coverage. Lancet 2012; 380: 126–33. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60357-2
  8. Baru R, Acharya A, Acharya S, Kumar AK, Nagaraj K. Inequities in access to health services in India: caste, class and region. Econ Polit Wkly 2010; 45: 49–58.
  9. Balrajan Y, Selvaraj S, Subramanian S V. Healthcare and Equity in India. Lancet 2011; 377: 505–15. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61894-6
  10. Culyer AJ, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A. Access, Utilisation and Equity: A Further Comment. J Health Econ 1992; 11: 207–10. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90037-2  
  11. Culyer AJ, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A. Utilisation as a Measure of Equity by Mooney, Hall, Donaldson and Gerard. J Health Econ 1992; 11: 93–8. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90027-x
  12. Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Equity in healthcare finance and delivery. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. p.1803–62.
  13. Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Measuring and Testing for Inequity in the Delivery of Healthcare. J Hum Resour 2000; 35: 716–33.
  14. Culyer AJ. Need: the idea won’t do--but we still need it. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 727–30. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00307-f
  15. Culyer AJ, Wagstaff A. Equity and equality in health and healthcare. J Health Econ 1993; 12: 431–57. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90004-x
  16. Kim Y, Kwon S, Xu K. Has Income-related Inequity in Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures Been Improved? Evidence From the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 2005 and 2010. J Prev Med Public Health 2013; 46: 237–48. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.5.237
  17. Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Tang J, Wang L,Wan Q, Tao S. Case Study on Horizontal Equity in Health Services Utilization is a component of Equity Research in Health Areas. Chinese Health Economics 2005; 24: 5–7.
  18. O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data: a Guide to Techniques and their Implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2008.doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6933-3
  19. van Doorslaer E, Masseria C, OECD Health Equity Research Group. Income-Related Inequality in the Use of Medical Care in 21 OECD Countries [internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/31743034.pdf
  20. van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, van der Burg H, Christiansen T, De Graeve D, Duchesne I, et al. Equity in the delivery of healthcare in Europe and the US. J Health Econ 2000; 19: 553–84. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00050-3
  21. O’Donnell O, Doorslaer EV, Rannan-Eliya RP, Somanathan A, Adhikari SR, Har-bianto D, et al. The Incidence of Public Spending on Healthcare: Comparative Evidence from Asia. World Bank Econ Rev 2007; 21: 93–123. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhl009
  22. Gravelle H. Measuring income related inequality in health: standardisation and the partial concentration index. Health Econ 2003; 12: 803–19. doi: 10.1002/hec.813
  23. Schokkaert E, Dhaene G, Voorde VD. Risk adjustment and the trade-off between efficiency and risk selection: an application of the theory of fair compensation. Health Econ 1998; 7: 465–80. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199808)7:5%3C465::aid-hec365%3E3.0.co;2-9
  24. Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) (various years). Database on national income statistics [internet]. Available from: http://www.cmie.com/
  25. Saikia D, Das K. Rural health infrastructures in North-east India [internet]. 2012. Available from: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41859/
  26. Mahal A, Yazbeck AS, Peters DH, Ramana GNV. The Poor and Health Services Use in India. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2001.
  27. Odeyemi IA, Nixon J. Assessing equity in healthcare through national health insurance schemes of Nigeria and Ghana: A review based comparative analysis. Int J Equity Health 2013; 12: 9. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-9
  28. IMS Institute for Health Informatics. Understanding healthcare access in India: what is the current state? [internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/imshealth/Global/Content/Corporate/IMS Institute/India/Understanding_Healthcare_Access_in_India.pdf
  29. Levesque JF, Haddad S, Narayana D, Fournier P. Outpatient care utilisation in urban Kerala, India. Health Policy Plan 2006; 21: 289–301. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czl013
  30. Prinja S, Kumar MI, Pinto AD, Jan S, Kumar R. Equity in hospital services utilisation in India. Econ Polit Wkly 2013; 48: 52–8.
  31. Chuma J, Maina T, Ataguba J. Does the distribution of healthcare benefits in Kenya meet the principles of universal coverage? BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-20
  32. Reddy KS, Patel V, Jha P, Paul VK, Shiva Kumar AK, Dandona L. Towards achievement of universal healthcare in India by 2020: a call to action. Lancet 2011; 6736: 61960–5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61960-5
  33. Gill K. A Primary Evaluation of service delivery under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM): findings from a study in Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Rajasthan. Working paper 1. New Delhi: Planning Commission of India; 2009.
  34. Ghosh S, Thakur H. Social Exclusion and Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana in Maharashtra: A Case Study. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences; 2013.
  35. Sun C. An analysis of RSBY enrolment patterns: Preliminary evidence and lessons from the early experience. In: Palacios R, Das J, Sun C, editors. India’s health insurance scheme for the poor: evidence from the early experience of the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research; 2011.
  36. Narayana D. Review of the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. Econ Polit Wkly 2010; 45: 13–8.
  37. Rathi P, Mukherji A, Sen G. Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana: Evaluating Utilisation, Roll-out and Perceptions in Amravati District, Maharashtra. Econ Polit Wkly 2012; 47: 57–64.
  38. Selvaraj S, Karan A. Why Publicly-Financed Health Insurance Schemes Are Ineffective in Providing Financial Risk Protection.Econ Polit Wkly 2012; 47: 60–8.
  39. Government of India. High Level Expert Group Report on Universal Health Coverage, Planning Commission of India. New Delhi: Government of India; 2011.
  40. Dilip T R. Understanding levels of morbidity and hospitalisation in Kerala, India. Bull World Health Organ 2002; 80: 746–51.
  41. Murray CJL, Chen LC. Understanding morbidity changes. Popul Dev Rev 1992; 18: 481–503.