Globalization and the Diffusion of Ideas: Why We Should Acknowledge the Roots of Mainstream Ideas in Global Health

Document Type: Perspective

Authors

1 University of Montreal Hospital Centre-Research Centre (CR-CHUM), University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

2 Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

3 Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

4 Department of Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract

Although globalization has created ample opportunities and spaces to share experiences and information, the diffusion of ideas, especially in global health, is primarily influenced by the unequal distribution of economic, political and scientific powers around the world. These ideas in global health are generally rooted in High-Income Countries (HICs), and then reach Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). We argue that acknowledging and addressing this invisible trend would contribute to a greater degree of open discussions in global health. This is expected to favor innovative, alternative, and culturally sound solutions for persistent health problems and reducing inequities.

Keywords

References

  1. Second Global Symposium on Health Systems Research. Global Symposium on Health Systems Research (HSR). Beijing, People’s Republic of China, 31 October - 3 November.  2012. Available from: http://www.healthsystemsresearch.org/hsr2012/
  2. Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM. A Guide to Managing Knowledge: Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.
  3. Sen K, Koivusalo M. Health care reforms and developing countries--a critical overview. Int J Health Plann Manage 1998; 13: 199-215. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1751(1998070)13:3 3C199::aid-hpm518 3E3.3.co;2-t
  4. Kleinman A. The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing and the Human Condition. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.; 1988.
  5. De Ferranti D. Paying for health services in developing countries: a call for realism. World Health Forum 1985; 6: 99-105.
  6. Lee K, Goodman H. Global policy networks: the propagation of health care financing reform since the 1980s. In: Lee K, K Buse, S Fustukian, editors. Health Policy in a Globalising World. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 97-119.
  7. Gilson L, McIntyre D. Removing user fees for primary care in Africa: the need for careful action. BMJ 2005; 331: 762-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7519.762
  8. Robert E, Samb OM. Pour une cartographie des soins de santé gratuits en Afrique de l’Ouest. Afr Contemp 2012; 3/2012: 100-1. doi: 10.3917/afco.243.0100
  9. Summerfield D. Cross-cultural Perspectives on the Medicalization of Human Suffering. In: Rosen GM, editor. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Issues and Controversies. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2004. p. 233-45.
  10. Summerfield D. How scientifically valid is the knowledge base of global mental health? BMJ 2008; 336: 992-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39513.441030.ad
  11. McKenzie K, Patel V, Araya R. Learning from low income countries: mental health. BMJ 2004; 329: 1138-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1138
  12. Argenti-Pillen AM. The global flow of knowledge on war trauma: The role of the “Cinnamon Garden culture” in Sri Lanka. In: Pottier J, P Sillitoe, A Bicker, editors. Negotiating Local Knowledge: Identity, Power and Situated Practice in Development Intervention. London: Pluto Press; 2003. p. 189-214.
  13. The World Bank. The World Bank DataBank [internet].  2013. Available from: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx
  14. Dieleman JL, Graves CM, Templin T, Johnson E, Baral R, Leach-Kemon K, et al. Global Health Development Assistance Remained Steady In 2013 But Did Not Align With Recipients' Disease Burden. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014; 33: 878-86. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1432
  15. OECD. Education at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators [internet].2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en
  16. Adam T, Ahmad S, Bigdeli M, Ghaffar A, Rottingen JA. Trends in health policy and systems research over the past decade: still too little capacity in low-income countries. PLoS One 2011; 6: e27263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027263
  17. Bliss KE. Key Players in Global Health: How Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa are influencing the game. A report of the CSIS Global Health Policy Center. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2010.
 

 

 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics