A Call for a Backward Design to Knowledge Translation

Document Type: Editorial

Authors

1 Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

2 Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

3 Center for Systematic Reviews in Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK), American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

4 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Despite several calls to support evidence-informed policy-making, variations in uptake of evidence into policy persist. This editorial brings together and builds on previous Knowledge Translation (KT) frameworks and theories to present a simple, yet, holistic approach for promoting evidence-informed policies. The proposed conceptual framework is characterized by its impact-oriented approach and its view of KT as a continuum from the evidence synthesis stage to uptake and evaluation, while highlighting capacity and resource requirement at every step. A practical example is given to guide readers through the different steps of the framework. With a growing interest in strengthening evidence-informed policy-making, there is a need to continuously develop theories to understand and improve the science of KT and its implementation within the field of policy-making.

Highlights

Commentaries Published on this Paper

  • Backwards Design or looking Sideways? Knowledge Translation in the Real World; Comment on “A Call for a Backward Design to Knowledge Translation”

            Abstract | PDF

  • Reflecting on Backward Design for Knowledge Translation; Comment on “A Call for a Backward Design to Knowledge Translation”

            Abstract | PDF

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 3: Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2009; 7 Suppl 1: S3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S3
  2. World Health Assembly: Resolution on Health Research. 2005. Available from: http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/58th_WHA_resolution.pdf
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). The Bamako Call to Action on Research for Health. 2008. Available from: http://www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB124/B124_12Add2-en.pdf
  4. Beijing Statement from the Second Global Symposium on Health Systems Research. 2012. Available from: http://healthsystemsresearch.org/hsr2012/images/stories/downloads/beijing_statement.pdf
  5. Straus S. Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ 2009; 181: 165-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081229
  6. Orem JN, Mafigiri DK, Marchal B, Ssengooba F, Macq J, Criel B. Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-109
  7. World Health Organization (WHO). Knowledge translation framework for ageing and health [internet].  2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/knowledge_translation/en/
  8. Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke MJ, Garner SE, Lavis JN, Perrier L, et al. Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 9: CD009401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2
  9. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: 337-50.
  10. Bangpan M, Stansfield C, Vigurs C, Oliver S. Systematic reviewing in low and middle income countries: a rapid appraisal of capacity. 2013. EPPI-Centre, SSRU, Institute of Education, University of London. Available from: http://www.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/CCSGagendaandopenaccessbackgroundpapers-Quebec2013.pdf
  11. El-Jardali F, Lavis J, Moat K, Pantoja T, Ataya N. Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection. Health Res Policy Syst 2014; 12: 2. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-2
  12. Lavis JN, Lomas J, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK. Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bull World Health Organ 2006; 84: 620-8. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.030312
  13. Lavis JN. How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking? PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000141
  14. Lavis JN, Catallo C. Bridging the worlds of research and policy in European health systems. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2013.
  15. Armstrong R, Waters E, Roberts H, Oliver S, Popay J. The role and theoretical evolution of knowledge translation and exchange in public health. J Public Health 2006; 28: 384-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl072
  16. Young J. Research, policy and practice: why developing countries are different. J Int Dev 2005; 17: 727-34. doi: 10.1002/jid.1235
  17. Moat KA, Lavis JN, Clancy SJ, El-Jardali F, Pantoja T. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ 2014; 92: 20-8. doi: 10.2471/blt.12.116806
  18. Wilson M, Lavis J, Moat K, Paprica A, Panisset U. The State-of-the-Art in Policy-Focused Knowledge Translatio. CAHSPR Annual Conference; 2014
  19. Lavis J, Boyko J, Gauvin F. Evaluating deliberative dialogues focused on healthy public policy. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 1287.
  20. El-Jardali F, Bou-Karroum L, Ataya N, El-Ghali HA, Hammoud R. A retrospective health policy analysis of the development and implementation of the voluntary health insurance system in Lebanon: Learning from failure. Soc Sci Med 2014; 123: 45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.044
  21. Carlisle S. Health promotion, advocacy and health inequalities: a conceptual framework. Health Promot Int 2000; 15: 369-76. doi: 10.1093/heapro/15.4.369
  22. Moat KA, Lavis JN, Abelson J. How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis. Milbank Q 2013; 91: 604-48. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12026
  23. Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO. Political and Institutional Influences on the Use of Evidence in Public Health Policy. A Systematic Review. PLoS One 2013; 8: e77404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077404
  24. Lemire N, Souffez K, Laurendeau M. Facilitating a knowledge translation process: Knowledge review and facilitation tool. Institut National de Sante Publique du Quebec; 2013. p. 1-71.
  25. LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M. The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 751. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-751
  26. Bunn F, Sworn K. Strategies to promote the impact of systematic reviews on healthcare policy: A systematic review of the literature. Evid Policy 2011; 7: 403-28.​ doi: 10.1332/174426411x603434
  27. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Wayne Perry B. Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q 2007; 85: 729-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x
  28. Brehaut JC, Eva KW. Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: use the entire menu of constructs. Implement Sci 2012; 7: 114. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x