Measuring Access to Urban Health Services Using Geographical Information System (GIS): A Case Study of Health Service Management in Bandar Abbas, Iran

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

2 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

3 Food and Cosmetic Health Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Abstract

Background
The current distribution of and access to health services along with the future health needs of the population have prompted wide application of Geographic Information Systems (GISs). During recent years, GIS has been used in public health management for planning and organization of healthcare services. This study investigates geographical accessibility of residential areas in Bandar Abbas, Iran to healthcare services.
 
Methods
Accessibility was evaluated by using Floating Catchment Area (FCA), minimum distance methods and Response Time (RT) accessibility technique.
 
Results
More accurate measures of distances in Bandar Abbas, illustrated that Euclidean distances were not strongly correlated with network distances. The RT accessibility technique that utilizes shortest network path and time distances, presented detailed information about all the possible positions of the patients with respect to available healthcare services based on optimum and critical response times.
 
Conclusion
Locations of public health services in Bandar Abbas were not related to the sites of populations. The RT accessibility technique provides a reasonably sensitive and robust evaluation of accessibility

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Joseph AE, Phillips DR. Accessibility and utilization: geographical perspectives on health care delivery. New York: Harper & Row; 1984.
  2. Apparicio P, Abdelmajid M, Riva M, Shearmur R. Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. Int J Health Geogr 2008; 7: 7.  doi: 10.1186/1476-072x-7-7
  3. Hewko J, Smoyer-Tomic K E, Hodgson MJ. Measuring neighbourhood spatial accessibility to urban amenities: Does aggregation error matter? Environ Plan A 2002; 34: 1185-206.  doi: 10.1068/a34171
  4. Glass D. A world health organization pilot study involving environment, public health and GIS. Mapping Awareness and GIS in Europe 1991; 6: 36-40. 
  5. Nicol J. Geographic information systems within the national health service: the scope for implementation. Planning Outlook 1991; 34: 37-42.  doi: 10.1080/00320719108711887
  6. Dunn C. GIS and Epidemiology. Education, Training and Research. London: Association of Geographic Information; 1992.
  7. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology. A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. London: Little, Brown and Co Inc.; 1991.
  8. Thrall GI. The Future of GIS in Public Health Management and Practice. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999; 5: 82.  doi: 10.1097/00124784-199907000-00014
  9. Roper WL, Mays GP. GIS and Public Health Policy: A New Frontier for Improving Community Health. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999; 5: vi-vii. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199905020-00002
  10. Kulldorff M. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Community Health: Some Statistical Issues. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999; 5: 100-6.  doi: 10.1097/00124784-199905020-00038
  11. Yasnoff WA, Sondik EJ. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in public health practice in the new millennium. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999; 5: ix-xii.  doi: 10.1097/00124784-199907000-00002
  12. Dowie PJ, Koval SJ, Burnhill PM, Healy RG. GIS and community health care: a study of geriatric services provision; 1995.
  13. Foley R. Assessing the applicability of GIS in a health and social care setting: planning services for informal carers in East Sussex, England. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55: 79-96. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00208-8  
  14. Talen E. Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environ Plann B Plann Des 2003; 30: 181-200.  doi: 10.1068/b12977
  15. Talen E, Anselin L. Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environ Plan A 1998; 30: 595-613. doi: 10.1068/a300595  
  16. Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. Quantitative geography: Perspectives on spatial data analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2000.
  17. Apparicio P, Brochu M, Dussault G. The measure of distance in a social science policy context: Advantages and costs of using network distances in eight Canadian metropolitan areas. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis 2003; 7: 105-31. 
  18. Brabyn L, Skelly C. Modeling population access to New Zealand public hospitals. Int J Health Geogr 2002; 1: 3. 
  19. Fone DL, Christie S, Lester N. Comparison of perceived and modelled geographical access to accident and emergency departments: a cross-sectional analysis from the Caerphilly Health and Social Needs Study. Int J Health Geogr 2006; 5: 16. 
  20. Luo W. Using a GIS-based floating catchment method to assess areas with shortage of physicians. Health  Place 2004; 10: 1-11.  doi: 10.1016/s1353-8292(02)00067-9
  21. Higgs G. A literature review of the use of GIS-based measures of access to health care services. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2004; 5: 119-39. doi: 10.1007/s10742-005-4304-7
  22. Aronoff S. Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective. Ottowa: WDL Publications; 1991.
  23. Hogan AM. Audit: Response times to calls for emergency medical services could be improved. Berkeley: Office of the City Auditor; 2008.
  24. Ludwig GG. EMS Response Time Standards [internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.emsworld.com/article/10324786/          ems-response-time-standards
  25. Martin D, Williams H. Market-area analysis and accessibility to primary health-care centres. Environ Plan A 1992; 24: 1009-19. doi: 10.1068/a241009  
  26. Joseph AE, Bantock PR. Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: a method and case study. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 85-90.  doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90428-2
  27. McLafferty SL. GIS and health care. Annu Rev Public Health 2003; 24: 25-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.012902.141012