Shaping the Health Policy Agenda: The Case of Safe Motherhood Policy in Vietnam

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Hanoi School of Public Health, Hà Nội, Vietnam

2 Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

3 Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background
Maternal health remains a central policy concern in Vietnam. With a commitment to achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5 target of maternal mortality rate (MMR) of 70/100 000 by 2015, the Ministry of Health (MoH) issued the National Plan for Safe Motherhood (NPSM) 2003-2010. In 2008, reproductive health, including safe motherhood (SM) became a national health target program with annual government funding.
 
Methods
A case study of how SM emerged as a political priority in Vietnam over the period 2001-2008, drawing on Kingdon’s theory of agenda-setting was conducted. A mixed method was adopted for this study of the NPSM.
 
Results
Three related streams contributed to SM priority in Vietnam: (1) the problem of high MMR was officially recognized from high-quality research, (2) the strong roles of policy champion from MoH in advocating for the needs to reducing MMR as well as support from government and donors, and (3) the national and international events, providing favorable context for this issue to emerge on policy agenda.
 
Conclusion
This paper draws on the theory of agenda-setting to analyze the Vietnam experience and to develop guidance for SM a political priority in other high maternal mortality communities.

Highlights

Commentaries Published on this Paper

  • The Health Policy Process in Vietnam: Going Beyond Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Theory; Comment on “Shaping the Health Policy Agenda: The Case of Safe Motherhood Policy in Vietnam”

          Abstract | PDF

  • Political Impetus: Towards a Successful Agenda-Setting for Inclusive Health Policies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries; Comment on “Shaping the Health Policy Agenda: The Case of Safe Motherhood Policy in Vietnam”

          Abstract | PDF

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ministry of Health (MoH). National Strategy on Reproductive Health Care 2001-2010. Resolution No 136/QD-TTg by Priminister at November 28, 2000; 2000.
  2. Ministry of Health (MoH). Maternal Mortality in Vietnam 2000-2001: an in-depth analysis of causes and determinant; 2002.
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal Mortality in Vietnam 2000-2001: An In-depth Analysis of Causes and Determinants. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
  4. Ministry of Health (MoH). Decision by Minister of Health on the Approval of National Plan of Safe Motherhood in Vietnam 2003 - 2010. 5792/2003/QD-BYT2003.
  5. Ministry of Health (MoH). National Plan for Reproductive Health, focusing on Safe Motherhood and Newborn Care 2011-2015. 2718/QD-BYT2012.
  6. Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Longman; 1984.
  7. Shiffman J, Stanton C, Salazar P. The emergence of political priority for safe motherhood in Honduras. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(6):380-390. Doi:10.1093/heapol/czh053
  8. Shiffman J, Ved R. The state of political priority for safe motherhood in India. BJOG. 2007;114:785-790. Doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01374.x
  9. Green A, Gerein N, Mirzoev T, et al. Health policy processes in maternal health: a comparison of Vietnam, India and China. Health Policy. 2011;100(2-3):167-173. Doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.11.016
  10. Ha B, Green A, Gerein N, Danielsen K. Health policy processes in Vietnam: a comparison of three maternal health case studies. Health Policy. 2010;98(2-3):178-185. Doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.06.015
  11. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, eds. Analyzing Qualitative Data. New York: Routledge; 1994.
  12. Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins; 1995.
  13. Hajer M, Wagenaar H. Deliberative policy analysis. Cambrigde: Cambrigge University Press; 2003.
  14. Ministry of Health (MoH). Vietnam Health Report 2006; 2007.
  15. Ministry of Health (MoH), Health Partnership Group. Joint Annual Health Review 2010. Vietnam's Health System on the Threshold of the Five-year Plan 2011-2015. Hanoi, Vietnam: MoH; 2010.
  16. National Assembly. Law on the promulgation of legal documents of the National Assembly (12th Legislature). N17/2008/QH12 on June 03, 2008;2008.
  17. Ha B, Huong N, Dung P. Assessment of implementation of national reproductive health care strategy 2000-2010: Hanoi School of Public Health; 2009.
  18. Hanoi School of Public Health. Country report on health policy-making in Vietnam, its determinants and their inter-relationships- HEPVIC project; 2009.
  19. Campbell OM, Graham W. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368:1284-1299. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69381-1
  20. World Health Organization (WHO). Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. A joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
  21. Ministry of Health (MoH). Decision on approval of training manual on core competencies of skilled birth attendants. 3982/QD-BYT;2014.
  22. Shiffman J. Generating Political Priority for Maternal Mortality Reduction in 5 Developing Countries. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:796-803. Doi:10.2105/ajph.2006.095455
  23. Shiffman J, Okonofua F. The state of political priority for safe motherhood in Nigeria. BJOG. 2007;114:127-133. Doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01184.x
  24. Shiffman J. Generating political will for safe motherhood in IndonesiaS. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:1197-1207. Doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00119-3