The Relationship Between the Scope of Essential Health Benefits and Statutory Financing: An International Comparison Across Eight European Countries

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, and Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background
Both rising healthcare costs and the global financial crisis have fueled a search for policy tools in order to avoid unsustainable future financing of essential health benefits. The scope of essential health benefits (the range of services covered) and depth of coverage (the proportion of costs of the covered benefits that is covered publicly) are corresponding variables in determining the benefits package. We hypothesized that a more comprehensive health benefit package may increase user costsharing charges.
 
Methods
We conducted a desktop research study to assess the interrelationship between the scope of covered health benefits and the height of statutory spending in a sample of 8 European countries: Belgium, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Scotland, Sweden, and Switzerland. We conducted a targeted literature search to identify characteristics of the healthcare systems in our sample of countries. We analyzed similarities and differences based on the dimensions of publicly financed healthcare as published by the European Observatory on Health Care Systems.
 
Results
We found that the scope of services is comparable and comprehensive across our sample, with only marginal differences. Cost-sharing arrangements show the most variation. In general, we found no direct interrelationship in this sample between the ranges of services covered in the health benefits package and the height of public spending on healthcare. With regard to specific services (dental care, physical therapy), we found indications of an association between coverage of services and cost-sharing arrangements. Strong variations in the volume and price of healthcare services between the 8 countries were found for services with large practice variations.
 
Conclusion
Although reducing the scope of the benefit package as well as increasing user charges may contribute to the financial sustainability of healthcare, variations in the volume and price of care seem to have a much larger impact on financial sustainability. Policy-makers should focus on a variety of measures within an integrated approach. There is no silver bullet for addressing the sustainability of healthcare.

Keywords

Main Subjects


"Watch the Video Summary"

  1. Mladovsky P, Srivastava D, Cylus J, et al. Health Policy Responses to the Financial Crisis in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
  2. Thomson S, Jowett M, Evetovits T, Jakab M, McKee M, Figueras J. Health, Health Systems and Economic Crisis in Europe: Impact and Policy Implications. Copenhagen: World Health Organization/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2013.
  3. Ulmer C, Ball J, McGlynn E, Shadia Bel Hamdounia S. Essential Health Benefits: Balancing Coverage and Costs. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine (IOM); 2011.
  4. Chernew ME, Newhouse JP. Health care spending growth. In: Pauly MV, McGuire TG, Pedro PB, eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Elsevier; 2000:1-43.
  5. Busse R, Schreyogg J, Velasco-Garrido M. HealthBASKET: Synthesis Report. Brussels: EHMA; 2006.
  6. Schreyogg J, Stargardt T, Velasco-Garrido M, Busse R. Defining the "Health Benefit Basket" in nine European countries. Evidence from the European Union Health BASKET Project. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6(1):2-10. doi:10.1007/s10198-005-0312-3
  7. Garner S, Littlejohns P. Disinvestment from low value clinical interventions: NICEly done? BMJ. 2011;343:d4519. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4519
  8. Elshaug AG, Watt AM, Mundy L, Willis CD. Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian study. Med J Aust. 2012;197(10):556-560. doi:10.5694/mja12.11083
  9. College voor Zorgverzekeringen (CVZ). Pakketbeheer in de praktijk deel 3 (CONCEPT). Diemen: CVZ; 2013.
  10. Corlette S, Lucia KW, Levin M. Implementing the Affordable Care Act: choosing an essential health benefits benchmark plan. The Commonwealth Fund. 2013;15:1-14.
  11. HHS. Essential Health Benefits Bulletin. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight; 2011.
  12. Frank R. Economics and mental health: an international perspective. In: Glied S, Smith P, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Health Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011:232-233.
  13. Chernew M. Additional reductions in Medicare spending growth will likely require shifting costs to beneficiaries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(5):859-863. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1239
  14. Smith PC. Universal health coverage and user charges. Health Econ Policy Law. 2013; 8(4):529-535. doi:10.1017/s1744133113000285
  15. Rechel B, Thomson S, van Ginneken E. Health Systems in Transition: Template for Authors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policy; 2010.
  16. Chevreul K, Durand-Zaleski I, Bahrami SB, Hernandez-Quevedo C, Mladovsky P. France: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(6):1-291.
  17. Busse R, Bluemel M. Germany: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(2):1-296.
  18. Gerkens S, Merkur S. Belgium: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010; 12(5):1-266.
  19. Boyle S. United Kingdom (England): Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011; 13(1):1-483.
  20. Schafer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, et al. The Netherlands: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):1-228.
  21. Steel D, Cylus J. United Kingdom (Scotland): Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(9):1-150.
  22. Anell A, Glenngard AH, Merkur S. Sweden: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(5):1-159.
  23. European-Observatory. Health Care Systems in Transition: Switzerland. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Care Systems; 2000.
  24. Thomson S, Osborn R, Squires D, Jun M. International profiles of Health Care Systems. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012.
  25. MISSOC: Mutual Information System on Social Protection website. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=815&langId=en. Accessed December 23, 2014.
  26. Daley C, Gubb J. Healthcare Systems: Switzerland. London: Civitas Health Unit; 2012.
  27. Daley C, Gubb J. Healthcare Systems: The Netherlands. London: Civitas Health Unit; 2013.
  28. Green D, Irvine B, Clark E, Bidgood E. Healthcare Systems: Germany. London: Civitas Health Unit; 2012.
  29. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD. OECD Reviews of Health Systems - Switzerland. Paris: OECD; 2011.
  30. Paris V, Devaux M, Wei L. Health Systems Institutional Characteristics. A survey of 29 countries, OECD Working Paper No. 50. Paris: OECD; 2010.
  31. Health Data. OECD website. http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/oecdhealthdata.htm. Accessed December 21, 2014
  32. Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Bishop M, Peugh J, Murukutla N. Toward higher-performance health systems: adults' health care experiences in seven countries, 2007. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(6):w717-w734. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.w717
  33. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM, Pierson R, Applebaum S. How health insurance design affects access to care and costs, by income, in eleven countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(12):2323-2334. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0862
  34. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM. Access, affordability, and insurance complexity are often worse in the United States compared to ten other countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(12):2205-2215. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0879
  35. SHARE. Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe. Wave 1,2,4. In: Wave 1,2,4. Edited by SHARE. Munich: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA); 2013.
  36. van Ginneken E, Swartz K, Van der Wees P. Health insurance exchanges in Switzerland and the Netherlands offer five key lessons for the operations of US exchanges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(4):744-752. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0948
  37. van de Ven WP, Beck K, Buchner F, et al. Preconditions for efficiency and affordability in competitive healthcare markets: are they fulfilled in Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland? Health Policy. 2013;109(3):226-245. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.002
  38. McPherson K, Gon G, Scott M. International variations in a selected number of publications, OECD Health Working Paper No. 61. Paris: OECD; 2013.
  39. Busse R, Schreyogg J, Smith PC. Variability in healthcare treatment costs amongst nine EU countries - results from the HealthBASKET project. Health Econ. 2008;17(1 Suppl):S1-S8. doi:10.1002/hec.1330
  40. Wismar M, Palm W, Figueras J, Ernst K, van Ginneken E. Cross-border health care in the European Union. Copenhagen: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2011.
  41. Mason A, Epstein D, Smith PC, et al. International comparison of costs:  An exploration of within- and between-country variations for  ten healthcare services in nine EU member states. York: Center for Health Economics; 2007.
  42. European-Commission. On effective, accessible and resilient systems. In: Communication from the Commission. European-Commission, eds. Brussels: European Commission; 2014.
  43. ASPE. Essential health benefits: comparing benefits in small group products and state and federal employee plans. Washington, DC: Office of the assistant secretary of planning and evaluation, US Department of Health; 2011.
  44. Gress S, Niebuhr D, Rothgang H, Wasem J. Criteria and procedures for determining benefit packages in health care. A comparative perspective. Health Policy. 2005;73(1):78-91. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.10.005
  45. Deveraux M, de Looper M. Income-related inequalities in health service utilization in 19 OECD countries. Health Working Papers No. 58. Paris: OECD, 2012.
  46. Thomson S, Jowett M, Evetovits T, Jakab M, McKee M, Figueras J. Health, Health Systems and Economic Crisis in Europe: Impact and Policy Implications. Copenhagen: WHO/ European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2013
  47. Levinson W, Kalewaard M, Bhatia RS, et al. ‘Choosing Wisely’ a growing international campaign. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(2):167-174. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003821
  48. Stretch D, Follmann M, Klemperer D, et al. When Choosing Wisely meets clinical practice guidelines. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundsheitswesen. 2014;108(10):601-603. doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.014
  49. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973;182 (4117):1102-1108. doi:10.1126/science.182.4117.1102
  50. Wennberg JE. Tracking Medicine. A Researcher's Quest to Understand Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010
  51. Corallo AN, Croxford R, Goodman DC, Bryan EL, Srivastava D, Stukel TA. A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy. 2014;114(1):5-14. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.002
  52. Wennberg J. Practice variations and health care reform: connecting the dots. Health Aff (Millwood). October2004. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.var.140
  53. Giovannelli J, Lucia KW, Sabrina C. Implementing the Affordable Care Act: revisiting the ACA’s essential health benefits requirements. The Commonw Fund. 2014;15:1-15.