Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, and Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Background Both rising healthcare costs and the global financial crisis have fueled a search for policy tools in order to avoid unsustainable future financing of essential health benefits. The scope of essential health benefits (the range of services covered) and depth of coverage (the proportion of costs of the covered benefits that is covered publicly) are corresponding variables in determining the benefits package. We hypothesized that a more comprehensive health benefit package may increase user costsharing charges.
Methods We conducted a desktop research study to assess the interrelationship between the scope of covered health benefits and the height of statutory spending in a sample of 8 European countries: Belgium, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Scotland, Sweden, and Switzerland. We conducted a targeted literature search to identify characteristics of the healthcare systems in our sample of countries. We analyzed similarities and differences based on the dimensions of publicly financed healthcare as published by the European Observatory on Health Care Systems.
Results We found that the scope of services is comparable and comprehensive across our sample, with only marginal differences. Cost-sharing arrangements show the most variation. In general, we found no direct interrelationship in this sample between the ranges of services covered in the health benefits package and the height of public spending on healthcare. With regard to specific services (dental care, physical therapy), we found indications of an association between coverage of services and cost-sharing arrangements. Strong variations in the volume and price of healthcare services between the 8 countries were found for services with large practice variations.
Conclusion Although reducing the scope of the benefit package as well as increasing user charges may contribute to the financial sustainability of healthcare, variations in the volume and price of care seem to have a much larger impact on financial sustainability. Policy-makers should focus on a variety of measures within an integrated approach. There is no silver bullet for addressing the sustainability of healthcare.
Mladovsky P, Srivastava D, Cylus J, et al. Health Policy Responses to the Financial Crisis in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
Thomson S, Jowett M, Evetovits T, Jakab M, McKee M, Figueras J. Health, Health Systems and Economic Crisis in Europe: Impact and Policy Implications. Copenhagen: World Health Organization/European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2013.
Ulmer C, Ball J, McGlynn E, Shadia Bel Hamdounia S. Essential Health Benefits: Balancing Coverage and Costs. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine (IOM); 2011.
Chernew ME, Newhouse JP. Health care spending growth. In: Pauly MV, McGuire TG, Pedro PB, eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Elsevier; 2000:1-43.
Schreyogg J, Stargardt T, Velasco-Garrido M, Busse R. Defining the "Health Benefit Basket" in nine European countries. Evidence from the European Union Health BASKET Project. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6(1):2-10. doi:10.1007/s10198-005-0312-3
Garner S, Littlejohns P. Disinvestment from low value clinical interventions: NICEly done? BMJ. 2011;343:d4519. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4519
Elshaug AG, Watt AM, Mundy L, Willis CD. Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian study. Med J Aust. 2012;197(10):556-560. doi:10.5694/mja12.11083
College voor Zorgverzekeringen (CVZ). Pakketbeheer in de praktijk deel 3 (CONCEPT). Diemen: CVZ; 2013.
Corlette S, Lucia KW, Levin M. Implementing the Affordable Care Act: choosing an essential health benefits benchmark plan. The Commonwealth Fund. 2013;15:1-14.
HHS. Essential Health Benefits Bulletin. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight; 2011.
Frank R. Economics and mental health: an international perspective. In: Glied S, Smith P, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Health Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011:232-233.
Chernew M. Additional reductions in Medicare spending growth will likely require shifting costs to beneficiaries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(5):859-863. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1239
Smith PC. Universal health coverage and user charges. Health Econ Policy Law. 2013; 8(4):529-535. doi:10.1017/s1744133113000285
Rechel B, Thomson S, van Ginneken E. Health Systems in Transition: Template for Authors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policy; 2010.
Chevreul K, Durand-Zaleski I, Bahrami SB, Hernandez-Quevedo C, Mladovsky P. France: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(6):1-291.
Busse R, Bluemel M. Germany: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(2):1-296.
Gerkens S, Merkur S. Belgium: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010; 12(5):1-266.
Boyle S. United Kingdom (England): Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011; 13(1):1-483.
Schafer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, et al. The Netherlands: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):1-228.
Steel D, Cylus J. United Kingdom (Scotland): Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(9):1-150.
Anell A, Glenngard AH, Merkur S. Sweden: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(5):1-159.
European-Observatory. Health Care Systems in Transition: Switzerland. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Care Systems; 2000.
Thomson S, Osborn R, Squires D, Jun M. International profiles of Health Care Systems. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012.
Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Bishop M, Peugh J, Murukutla N. Toward higher-performance health systems: adults' health care experiences in seven countries, 2007. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(6):w717-w734. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.w717
Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM, Pierson R, Applebaum S. How health insurance design affects access to care and costs, by income, in eleven countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(12):2323-2334. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0862
Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM. Access, affordability, and insurance complexity are often worse in the United States compared to ten other countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(12):2205-2215. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0879
SHARE. Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe. Wave 1,2,4. In: Wave 1,2,4. Edited by SHARE. Munich: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA); 2013.
van Ginneken E, Swartz K, Van der Wees P. Health insurance exchanges in Switzerland and the Netherlands offer five key lessons for the operations of US exchanges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(4):744-752. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0948
van de Ven WP, Beck K, Buchner F, et al. Preconditions for efficiency and affordability in competitive healthcare markets: are they fulfilled in Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland? Health Policy. 2013;109(3):226-245. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.002
McPherson K, Gon G, Scott M. International variations in a selected number of publications, OECD Health Working Paper No. 61. Paris: OECD; 2013.
Busse R, Schreyogg J, Smith PC. Variability in healthcare treatment costs amongst nine EU countries - results from the HealthBASKET project. Health Econ. 2008;17(1 Suppl):S1-S8. doi:10.1002/hec.1330
Wismar M, Palm W, Figueras J, Ernst K, van Ginneken E. Cross-border health care in the European Union. Copenhagen: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2011.
Mason A, Epstein D, Smith PC, et al. International comparison of costs: An exploration of within- and between-country variations for ten healthcare services in nine EU member states. York: Center for Health Economics; 2007.
European-Commission. On effective, accessible and resilient systems. In: Communication from the Commission. European-Commission, eds. Brussels: European Commission; 2014.
ASPE. Essential health benefits: comparing benefits in small group products and state and federal employee plans. Washington, DC: Office of the assistant secretary of planning and evaluation, US Department of Health; 2011.
Gress S, Niebuhr D, Rothgang H, Wasem J. Criteria and procedures for determining benefit packages in health care. A comparative perspective. Health Policy. 2005;73(1):78-91. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.10.005
Deveraux M, de Looper M. Income-related inequalities in health service utilization in 19 OECD countries. Health Working Papers No. 58. Paris: OECD, 2012.
Thomson S, Jowett M, Evetovits T, Jakab M, McKee M, Figueras J. Health, Health Systems and Economic Crisis in Europe: Impact and Policy Implications. Copenhagen: WHO/ European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2013
Levinson W, Kalewaard M, Bhatia RS, et al. ‘Choosing Wisely’ a growing international campaign. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(2):167-174. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003821
Stretch D, Follmann M, Klemperer D, et al. When Choosing Wisely meets clinical practice guidelines. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundsheitswesen. 2014;108(10):601-603. doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.014
Wennberg JE. Tracking Medicine. A Researcher's Quest to Understand Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010
Corallo AN, Croxford R, Goodman DC, Bryan EL, Srivastava D, Stukel TA. A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy. 2014;114(1):5-14. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.002
Wennberg J. Practice variations and health care reform: connecting the dots. Health Aff (Millwood). October2004. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.var.140
Giovannelli J, Lucia KW, Sabrina C. Implementing the Affordable Care Act: revisiting the ACA’s essential health benefits requirements. The Commonw Fund. 2014;15:1-15.