Power and Politics in the Global Health Landscape: Beliefs, Competition and Negotiation Among Global Advocacy Coalitions in the Policy-Making Process

Document Type: Original Article


Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK


Advocacy coalitions play an increasingly prominent role within the global health landscape, linking actors and institutions to attract political attention and resources. This paper examines how coalitions negotiate among themselves and exercise hidden forms of power to produce policy on the basis of their beliefs and strategic interests.
This paper examines the beliefs and behaviours of health advocacy coalitions using Sabatier’s Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) as an informal theoretical lens. Coalitions are further explored in relation to the concept of transnational advocacy networks (Keck and Sikkink) and of productive power (Shiffman). The ACF focuses on explaining how policy change takes place when there is conflict concerning goals and technical approaches among different actors. This study uses participant observation methods, self-reported survey results and semistructured qualitative interviews to trace how a major policy project of the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) era, the Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health, was constructed through negotiations among maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) advocacy coalitions.
The Global Strategy represented a new opportunity for high-level political attention. Despite differing policy beliefs, MNCH and SRHR actors collaborated to produce this strategy because of anticipated gains in political attention. While core beliefs did not shift fundamentally and collaboration was primarily a short-term tactical response to a time-bound opportunity, MNCH actors began to focus more on human rights perspectives and SRHR actors adopted greater use of quantifiable indicators and economic argumentation. This shift emphasises the inherent importance of SRHR to maternal and child health survival.
As opportunities arise, coalitions respond based on principles and policy beliefs, as well as to perceptions of advantage. Global health policy-making is an arena of contested interests, power and ideas, shaped by the interaction of coalitions. Although policy-making is often seen as a process that should be guided by evidence rather than interest-based politics, this study concludes that a participatory process of debate among different actorcoalitions is vital to progress and can lend greater legitimacy, accountability and transparency to the policy process.


Main Subjects

  1. Keck M, Sikkink K. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell, NY: Cornell University Press; 1998.
  2. Fidler DP. Architecture amidst anarchy: global health's quest for governance. Glob Health Gov. 2007;1:1-17.
  3. Bruen C, Brugha R. A ghost in the machine? Politics in global health policy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(1):1-4. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.59
  4. McCoy D, Singh G. A spanner in the works? anti-politics in global health policy: Comment on "A ghost in the machine? politics in global health policy." Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(3):151-153. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.77
  5. Harmer A. Democracy - the real 'ghost' in the machine of global health policy: Comment on "A ghost in the machine? politics in global health policy." Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(3):149-150. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.75
  6. Shiffman J. Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(6):297-299. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.120
  7. Rushton S,  Williams OD, eds. Partnerships and Foundations in Global Health Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
  8. Biesma RG, Brugha R, Harmer A, Walsh A, Spicer N, Walt G. The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24(4):239-252. doi:10.1093/heapol/czp025
  9. Warren AE, Wyss K, Shakarishvili G, Atun R, de Savigny D. Global health initiative investments and health systems strengthening: a content analysis of global fund investments. Global Health. 2013;9(1):30. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-9-30
  10. Frenk J, Moon S. Governance challenges in global health. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(10):936-942. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1109339
  11. Fidler D. The challenges of global health governance. Working Paper. New York: Council on Foreign Relations; 2010.
  12. Sidibe M, Buse K. AIDS governance: best practices for a post-2015 world. Lancet. 2013;381(9884):2147-2149. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61413-0
  13. Horton R. Offline: the uses of discomfort. Lancet. 2015;385(9971):840.
  14. Sabatier PA. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci. 1988;21:129-168.
  15. Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In: Sabatier  PA, ed. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder CO: Westview Press; 1999:117-166.
  16. Della Porta D, Diani M. Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006.
  17. Nelson PJ. Human rights, the Millennium Development Goals, and the future of future of development cooperation. World Dev. 2007;35(12):2041-2055.
  18. Larsen JB, Vrangbaek K, Traulsen JM. Advocacy coalitions and pharmacy policy in Denmark--solid cores with fuzzy edges. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(1):212-224. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.045
  19. Benford RD, Snow DA. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu Rev Sociol. 2000;26:611-639.
  20. Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown; 1984.
  21. Jenkins-Smith HC. Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework. J Public Policy. 1994;14:175-201.
  22. Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier  PA, ed. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder CO: Westview Press; 2007:189-220.
  23. Farquharson K. Influencing policy transnationally: pro- and anti-tobacco global advocacy networks. Aust J Public Adm. 2003;62:80-92.
  24. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1993-1995. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60332-9
  25. Weible CM, Sabatier PA. A guide to the Advocacy Coalition Framework. In: Fischer F, Miller GJ, eds. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics & Methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007:123-136.
  26. Litfin KT. Advocacy coalitions along the domestic-foreign frontier: globalization and Canadian climate change policy. Policy Stud J. 2000;28:236-252.
  27. Diaz-Martinez E, Gibbons E. The questionable power of the Millennium Development Goals to reduce child mortality. J Human Dev Capabil. 2014;15:203-217.
  28. Yamin AE, Boulanger VM. Why global goals and indicators matter: the experience of sexual and reproductive health and rights in the Millennium Development Goals. J Human Dev Capabil. 2014;15(2-3):218-231.
  29. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
  30. Partnership for Maternal Newborn and Child Health. The PMNCH 2012 Report: Analysing Progress on Commitments to the Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health. http://www.who.int/pmnch/topics/part_publications/2012_pmnch_report_full_publicaton.pdf. Published 2012.
  31. Partnership for Maternal Newborn and Child Health. The PMNCH 2013 Report: Analysing Progress on Commitments to the Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health. http://www.who.int/pmnch/knowledge/publications/pmnch_report13.pdf. Published 2013.
  32. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 3rd ed. Thusand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
  33. Walt G, Shiffman J, Schneider H, Murray SF, Brugha R, Gilson L. 'Doing' health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23(5):308-317. doi:10.1093/heapol/czn024
  34. Bustreo F, Gorna R. Knowledge for effective action to improve the health of women, children and adolescents in the post-2015 era: a call for papers. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(5):286-286A.
  35. Fukuda-Parr S, Hulme D. International Norm Dynamics and 'the End of Poverty': Understanding the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). http://www.bwpi.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/publications/working_papers/bwpi-wp-9609.pdf. Accessed 2015. Published 2009.
  36. Ban KM. Empowering women to change the world. Philadelphia, PA: Speech given to the Global Colloquium of University Presidents; 2011.
  37. NORAD. Global Campaign for the Health MDGs: Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg launched the Global Campaign for the Health MDGs in New York in September 2007. http://www.norad.no/en/front/thematic-areas/global-health/maternal-child-and-womens-health/global-campaign-for-the-health-mdgs/. Accessed October 11, 2015. Published 2015.
  38. The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH). Investing in Our Common Future: Healthy Women, Healthy Children. http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/events/2009/20090923_mnchconsensusstory/en. Accessed October 9, 2015. Published 2009.
  39. Ibbitson J. Contraception a part of maternal-health plan, Harper says. The Globe and Mail. 2010. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/contraception-a-part-of-maternal-health-plan-harper-says/article4312322/
  40. Langer A, Horton R, Chalamilla G. A manifesto for maternal health post-2015. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):601-602. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60259-7
  41. Storeng KT, Mishra A. Introduction. Politics and practices of global health: critical ethnographies of health systems. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(8):858-864. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.941901
  42. Starrs AM. Safe motherhood initiative: 20 years and counting. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1130-1132. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69385-9
  43. Storeng KT, Behague DP. "Playing the numbers game": evidence-based advocacy and the technocratic narrowing of the Safe Motherhood Initiative. Med Anthropol Q. 2014;28(2):260-279. doi:10.1111/maq.12072
  44. Fehling M, Nelson BD, Venkatapuram S. Limitations of the Millennium Development Goals: a literature review. Glob Public Health. 2013;8(10):1109-1122. doi:10.1080/17441692.2013.845676
  45. Ziai A. The Millennium Development Goals: back to the future. Third World Q. 2011;32:27-43.
  46. Saith A. From universal values to Millennium Development Goals: lost in translation. Dev Change. 2006;36:1167-1199.
  47. Kabeer N. Tracking the gender politics of the Millennium Development Goals: struggles for interpretative power in the international development agenda. Third World Q. 2015;36:377-395.
  48. Kerber KJ, de Graft-Johnson JE, Bhutta ZA, Okong P, Starrs A, Lawn JE. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1358-1369. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5
  49. United Nations. Outcome document of the high-level plenary meeting of the sixty-fifth session of the General Assembly on the Millennium Development Goals. http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/pdf/Draft%20outcome%20document.pdf. Published 2010.
  50. United Nations. UN Summit launches drive to save the lives of more than 16 billion women and children. http://www.un.org/en/mdg/summit2010/pdf/GLOBAL%20STRATEGY%20PRESS%20RELEASE%20FINAL%20FINAL3_2_.pdf. Published 2010.
  51. Partnership for Maternal Newborn and Child Health (PMNCH). The PMNCH 2014 report: tracking financial commitments to the Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health. http://www.who.int/pmnch/knowledge/publications/pmnch_report14.pdf?ua=1. Published 2014.
  52. Independent Expert Review Group. Every Woman Every Child: strengthening equity and dignity through health. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85757/1/9789241505949_eng.pdf. Published 2013.
  53. Independent Expert Review Group. Every Woman Every Child: a post-2015 vision. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/132673/1/9789241507523_eng.pdf. Published 2014.
  54. Godwin P, Misra S. The Every Woman Every Child health-model of accountability in the post 2015 era: a multi-constituency platform to track accountability. http://www.who.int/pmnch/about/governance/partnersforum/2b_godwin_misra.pdf?ua=1. Published 2014.
  55. United Nations. The Global Strategy for Women's and Children's Health. http://www.who.int/pmnch/topics/maternal/20100914_gswch_en.pdf?ua=1. Published 2010.
  56. United Nations. The road to dignity by 2030: Ending poverty, transforming all lives and protecting the planet: Synthesis report of the Secretary-General on the post-2015 agenda. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/reports/SG_Synthesis_Report_Road_to_Dignity_by_2030.pdf. Published 2010.
  57. Buse K, Hawkes S. Health in the sustainable development goals: ready for a paradigm shift? Global Health. 2015;11:13. doi:10.1186/s12992-015-0098-8
  58. Fukuda-Parr S, Yamin AE, Greenstein J. The power of numbers: a critical review of Millennium Development Goal targets for human development and human rights. J Human Dev Capabil. 2014;15:105-117.
  59. Stenberg K, Axelson H, Sheehan P, et al. Advancing social and economic development by investing in women's and children's health: a new Global Investment Framework. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1333-1354. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62231-X
  60. United Nations. Saving lives, protecting futures: progress report on the Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health. http://www.everywomaneverychild.org/images/EWEC_Progress_Report_FINAL_3.pdf. Published 2015.
  61. United Nations. Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health, 2016-2030. http://www.who.int/life-course/partners/global-strategy/global-strategy-2016-2030/en/. Published 2015.
  62. Shiffman J. Global health as a field of power relations: a response to recent commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(7):497-499. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.104