Digital Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: A Perfect Storm of Rapid Evolution and Stagnant Regulation; Comment on “Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters”
1Department of Anesthesiology, San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
2Department of Medicine, Division of Global Public Health, San Diego School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
3Joint Masters Program in Health Policy and Law, San Diego School of Medicine and California Western School of Law, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
4Global Health Policy Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
The adoption and use of digital forms of direct-to-consumer advertising (also known as “eDTCA”) is on the rise. At the same time, the universe of eDTCA is expanding, as technology on Internet-based platforms continues to evolve, from static websites, to social media, and nearly ubiquitous use of mobile devices. However, little is known about how this unique form of pharmaceutical marketing impacts consumer behavior, public health, and overall healthcare utilization. The study by Kim analyzing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notices of violations (NOVs) and warning letters regarding online promotional activities takes us in the right direction, but study results raise as many questions as it does answers. Chief among these are unanswered concerns about the unique regulatory challenges posed by the “disruptive” qualities of eDTCA, and whether regulators have sufficient resources and oversight powers to proactively address potential violations. Further, the globalization of eDTCA via borderless Internet-based technologies raises larger concerns about the potential global impact of this form of health marketing unique to only the United States and New Zealand. Collectively, these challenges make it unlikely that regulatory science will be able to keep apace with the continued rapid evolution of eDTCA unless more creative policy solutions are explored.
Kim H. Trouble spots in online direct-to-consumer prescription drug promotion: a content analysis of FDA warning letters. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(12):813-821. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.157
Mackey TK, Cuomo RE, Liang BA. The rise of digital direct-to-consumer advertising? Comparison of direct-to-consumer advertising expenditure trends from publicly available data sources and global policy implications. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:236. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0885-1
Greene JA, Kesselheim AS. Pharmaceutical marketing and the new social media. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(22):2087-2089. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1004986
Davis JJ, Cross E, Crowley J. Pharmaceutical websites and the communication of risk information. J Health Commun. 2007;12(1):29-39. doi:10.1080/10810730601091326
Sheehan KB. Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Branded Drug Web Sites Risk Presentation and Implications for Public Policy. J Advert. 2013;36(3):123-135. doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367360310
Liang BA, Mackey T. Direct-to-consumer advertising with interactive internet media: global regulation and public health issues. JAMA. 2011;305(8):824-825. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.203
Tyrawski J, DeAndrea DC. Pharmaceutical Companies and Their Drugs on Social Media: A Content Analysis of Drug Information on Popular Social Media Sites. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(6):e130.
Mackey TK, Liang B. Globalization, Evolution and emergence of direct-to-consumer advertising: are emerging markets the next pharmaceutical marketing frontier. J Commer Biotechnol. 2012;18:58-64. doi:10.5912/jcb564
Nguyen D, Seoane-Vazquez E, Rodriguez-Monguio R, Montagne M. Changes in FDA enforcement activities following changes in federal administration: the case of regulatory letters released to pharmaceutical companies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:27. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-27
Ventola CL. Direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising: therapeutic or toxic? P T. 2011;36(10):669-684.
Tatsioni A, Gerasi E, Charitidou E, Simou N, Mavreas V, Ioannidis JPA. important drug safety information on the internet: assessing its accuracy and reliability. Drug Saf. 2003;26(7):519. doi:10.2165/00002018-200326070-00005
Neumann PJ, Bliss SK. FDA actions against health economic promotions, 2002–2011. Value Health. 2012;15(6):948-953. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.05.002
Collier R. Patient engagement or social media marketing? CMAJ. 2014;186(8):E237-E238. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-4739
Liang BA, Mackey T. Health care policy. Reforming off-label promotion to enhance orphan disease treatment. Science. 2010;327(5963):273-274. doi:10.1126/science.1181567
Wittich CM, Burkle CM, Lanier WL. Ten common questions (and their answers) about off-label drug use. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(10):982-990. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.04.017
Hamel MB, Avorn J, Sarpatwari A, Kesselheim AS. Forbidden and permitted statements about medications — loosening the rules. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(10):967-973. doi:10.1056/nejmhle1506365
Complaint, Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (S.D.N.Y. 2015).
Sharfstein JM, Charo A. The promotion of medical products in the 21st century: off-label marketing and first amendment concerns. JAMA. 2015;314(17):1795-1796. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.12045
Boumil MM. Off-Label Marketing and the First Amendment. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):103-105.
Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, et al. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:53. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-53
Mintzes B. Direct to consumer advertising of prescription drugs. BMJ. 2008;337:a985. doi:10.1136/bmj.a985
Mintzes B. Should Canada allow direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs? no. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55(2):131-133.
Mintzes B, Barer ML, Kravitz RL, et al. Influence of direct to consumer pharmaceutical advertising and patients' requests on prescribing decisions: two site cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2002;324(7332):278-279. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7332.278