Planning and Budgeting for Nutrition Programs in Tanzania: Lessons Learned From the National Vitamin A Supplementation Program

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Helen Keller International, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

2 United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

3 Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Abstract

Background
Micronutrient deficiency in Tanzania is a significant public health problem, with vitamin A deficiency (VAD) affecting 34% of children aged 6 to 59 months. Since 2007, development partners have worked closely to advocate for the inclusion of twice-yearly vitamin A supplementation and deworming (VASD) activities with budgets at the subnational level, where funding and implementation occur. As part of the advocacy work, a VASD planning and budgeting tool (PBT) was developed and is used by district officials to justify allocation of funds. Helen Keller International (HKI) and the Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre (TFNC) conduct reviews of VASD funds and health budgets annually in all districts to monitor the impact of advocacy efforts. This paper presents the findings of the fiscal year (FY) 2010 district budget annual review. The review was intended to answer the following questions regarding district-level funding: (1) how many funds were allocated to nutrition-specific activities in FY 2010? (2) how many funds were allocated specifically to twice-yearly VASD activities in FY 2010? and (3) how have VASD funding allocations changed over time?
 
Methods
Budgets from all 133 districts in Tanzania were accessed, reviewed and documented to identify line item funds allocated for VASD and other nutrition activities in FY 2010. Retrospective data from prior annual reviews for VASD were used to track trends in funding. The data were collected using specific data forms and then transcribed into an excel spreadsheet for analysis.
 
Results
The total funds allocated in Tanzania’s districts in FY 2010 amounted to US$1.4 million of which 92% were for VASD. Allocations for VASD increased from US$0.387 million to US$1.3 million between FY 2005 and FY 2010. Twelve different nutrition activities were identified in budgets across the 133 districts. Despite the increased trend, the percentage of districts allocating sufficient funds to implement VAS (as defined by cost per child) was just 21%.
 
Discussion
District-driven VAS funding in Tanzania continues to be allocated by districts consistently, although adequacy of funding is a concern. However, regular administrative data point to fairly high and consistent coverage rates for VAS across the country (over 80% over the last 10 years). Although this analysis may have omitted some nutrition-specific funding not identified in district budget data, it represents a reliable reflection of the nutrition funding landscape in FY 2010. For this year, total district nutrition allocations add up to only 2% of the amount needed to implement nutrition services at scale according to Tanzania’s National Nutrition Strategy Implementation Plan.
 
Conclusion
VASD advocacy and planning support at the district level has succeeded in ensuring district allocations for the program. To promote sustainable implementation of other nutrition interventions in Tanzania, more funds must be allocated and guidance must be accompanied by tools that enable planning and budgeting at the district level.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre (TFNC). Landscape Analysis of countries' readness to accelerate action in nutrition. Tanzania assessment for scalling up nutrition. TFNC report; 2012
  2. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MoHSW). Comprehensive Council Health Management Planning Guideline. The United Republic of Tanzania: Ministry of Health; 2010.
  3. Masanja H, de Savigny D, Smithson P, et al. Child survival gains in Tanzania: analysis of data from demographic and health surveys. Lancet. 2008;371(9620):1276-1283. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60562-0
  4. Ruel MT, Alderman H; Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Nutrition sensitive interventions and programs; how can they help to accelerate progress in improving martenal and child nutrition. Lancet. 2013;382(9891):536-551. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0.
  5. Worldbank. World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
  6. Rassas BM, Mulokozi G, Mugyabuso J, Lukmanji Z, Ruhiye D, Modaha F. Cost Analysis of the National Twice-Yearly Vitamin A Supplementation Program in Tanzania. Arlington, Virginia; 2005.
  7. World Health Organization (WHO). Abuja Declaration: Ten years On. http://www.who.int/healthsystems/publications/abuja_report_aug_2011.pdf. Accessed February 2015. Published 2001.
  8. Sikika. 2010/2011 Health Sector Budget Analysis. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Sikika; 2011.
  9. Mullins J, Ehrlich L. Assessment of the National Vitamin A Supplementation and De-worming Program in Tanzania. WellShare; 2011.
  10. Nyhus Dhillon C, Subramaniam H, Mulokozi G, Rambeloson Z, Klemm R. Overestimation of vitamin a supplementation coverage from district tally sheets demonstrates importance of population-based surveys for program improvement: lessons from Tanzania. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58629. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058629