Department of Public Health, Unit of Health Policy, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
There has been much reflection on the need for a new understanding of global health and the urgency of a paradigm shift to address global health issues. A crucial question is whether this is still possible in current modes of global governance based on capitalist values. Four reflections are provided. (1) Ecological–centered values must become central in any future global health framework. (2) The objectives of ‘sustainability’ and ‘economic growth’ present a profound contradiction. (3) The resilience discourse maintains a gridlock in the functioning of the global health system. (4) The legitimacy of multi-stakeholder governance arrangements in global health requires urgent attention. A dual track approach is suggested. It must be aimed to transform capitalism into something better for global health while in parallel there is an urgent need to imagine a future and pathways to a different world order rooted in the principles of social justice, protecting the commons and a central role for the preservation of ecology.
Bakker IC, Gill S. Towards a new common sense: The need for new paradigms of global health. In: Benatar S, Brock G, eds. Global Health and Global Health Ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011:329-332.
Gostin LO, Sridhar D, Hougendobler D. The normative authority of the World Health Organization. Public Health. 2015;129(7):854-863. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.05.002
Building a world community. Globalization and the common good. Copenhagen, Royal Danish Foreign Ministry for Foreign Affairs: Washington University Press; 2001
Benatar SR, Daar A, Singer P. Global health ethics: the rationale for mutual caring. Int Aff.2003;79:107-138. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00298
Ooms G. Navigating between stealth advocacy and unconscious dogmatism: the challenge of researching the norms, politics and power of global health. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(10):641-644. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.116
Shiffman J. Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3:297-299. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.120
Benatar S. Politics, power, poverty and global health: systems and frames. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(10):599-604. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.101
Ottersen OP, Dasgupta J, Blouin C, et al. The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change. Lancet. 2014;383(9917):630-667. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62407-1
Gill S, Benatar S. Global Health Governance and Global Power A Critical Commentary on the Lancet-University of Oslo Commission Report. Int J Health Serv. 2016. Doi:10.1177/0020731416631734
Pronk J. Op zoek naar een nieuwe kaart. Verspreide aantekeningen over ontwikkeling en ontwikkelingssamenwerking (Charting a new path. Scattered notes on development and development cooperation). Volendam: LM Publishers; 2015.
Gill S, Benatar S. History, structure and agency in global health governance: Comment on Global health governance challenges 2016–are we ready? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.119
Encyclical letter ‘Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis: On care for our common home. https://laudatosi.com/watch. Accessed October 13, 2016. Published 2015.
McMichael AJ, Kirk RS, Corvalan CF. The sustainability transition: a new challenge. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(9):1067-1067. Doi:10.1590/S0042-96862000000900002
Horton R, Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Raeburn J, McKee M4 Wall S. From public to planetary health: a manifesto. Lancet. 2014;383(9920):847. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60409-8
McFarlane R. Patterns of Ecological Change and Emerging Infectious Disease in the Australasian Region. In: Butler C, Dixon J, Capon A, eds. Health of People, Places and Planet. ANU Press; 2015:461-476. http://press.anu.edu.au?p=320071. Accessed October 13, 2016.
Siddiqui FR, Friedman EA, Nader A. Representativeness of the UN post-2015 national consultations. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(11):e631-e632. Doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70319-5
Sénit CA, Biermann F, Kalfagianni A. The representativeness of global deliberation: a critical assessment of civil society consultations for sustainable development. Global Policy. 2016. Doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12371
Harman S. The bill and melinda gates foundation and legitimacy in global health governance. Global Governance. 2016;22:349-368