A Qualitative Assessment of the Evidence Utilization for Health Policy-Making on the Basis of SUPPORT Tools in a Developing Country

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran

2 Department of Health Services Management, School of Medical Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background
SUPPORT tools consist of 18 articles addressing the health policy-makers so that they can learn how to make evidence-informed health policies. These tools have been particularly recommended for developing countries. The present study tries to explain the process of evidence utilization for developing policy documents in the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MoHME) and to compare the findings with those of SUPPORT tools.
 
Methods
A qualitative research was conducted, using the framework analysis approach. Participants consisted of senior managers and technicians in MoHME. Purposeful sampling was done, with a maximum variety, for the selection of research participants: individuals having at least 5 years of experience in preparing evidence-based policy documents. Face-to-face interviews were conducted for data collection. As a guideline for the interviews, ‘the Utilization of Evidence in Policy Making Organizations’ procedure was used. The data were analyzed through the analysis of the framework method using MAXQDA 10 software.
 
Results
The participants acquired the research evidence in a topic-based form, and they were less likely to search on the basis of the evidence pyramid. To assess the quality of evidence, they did not use standard critical tools; to adapt the evidence and interventions with the local setting, they did not use the ideas and experiences of all stakeholders, and in preparing the evidence-based policy documents, they did not take into consideration the window of opportunity, did not refrain from using highly technical terms, did not write user-friendly summaries, and did not present alternative policy options. In order to develop health policies, however, they used the following innovations: attention to the financial burden of policy issues on the agenda, sensitivity analysis of the preferred policy option on the basis of technical, sociopolitical, and economic feasibility, advocacy from other scholars, using the multi-criteria decisionmaking models for the prioritization of policy options, implementation of policy based on the degree of readiness of policy-implementing units, and the classification of policy documents on the basis of different conditions of policymaking (urgent, short-term, and long-term).
 
Conclusion
Findings showed that the process of evidence utilization in IR-MoH enjoys some innovations for the support of health policy development. The present study provides IR-MoH with considerable opportunities for the improvement of evidence-informed health policy-making. Moreover, the SUPPORT process and tools are recommended to be used in developing countries.

Keywords

Main Subjects


"Watch the Video Summary"

  1. Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plann. 1994;9(4):353-370.
  2. Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(Suppl 1):S1. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S1
  3. Segone M. Bridging the gap: The role of monitoring and evaluation in evidence-based policy making. https://www.unicef.org/ceecis/evidence_based_policy_making.pdf. Published 2008.
  4. Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, Osei E. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet. 2004;364(9445):1615-1621.
  5. Lavis JN, Davies HT, Gruen RL, Walshe K, Farquhar CM. Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers. Healthcare Policy. 2006;1(2):21.
  6. Almeida C, Báscolo E. Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature. Cad Saude Publica. 2006;22:S7-S19.
  7. Bosch-Capblanch X, Lavis JN, Lewin S, et al. Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001185. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001185
  8. Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Upshur R. Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(1):207-217.
  9. El-Jardali F, Lavis JN, Ataya N, Jamal D, Ammar W, Raouf S. Use of health systems evidence by policymakers in eastern Mediterranean countries: views, practices, and contextual influences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:200. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-200
  10. Imani Nasab MH, Mohaghegh B, Khalesi N, Jaafaripooyan E. Parallel quality assessment of emergency departments by european foundation for quality management model and Iranian national program for hospital evaluation. Iran Journal Public Health. 2013;42(6):610-619.
  11. Ettelt S, Mays N. Health services research in Europe and its use for informing policy. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011;16(suppl 2):48-60. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011004
  12. El-Jardali F, Ataya N, Jamal D, Jaafar M. A multi-faceted approach to promote knowledge translation platforms in eastern Mediterranean countries: climate for evidence-informed policy. Health Res Policy Systs. 2012;10:15.
  13. Oxman AD, Vandvik PO, Lavis JN, Fretheim A, Lewin S. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 2: improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking. Health Res Policy Systs. 2009;7(Suppl 1):S2.
  14. Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7 Suppl 1:S1. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S1
  15. Victorian Government Department of Health (VGDH). Making decisions about interventions: A guide for evidence-informed policy and practice. http://docs.health.vic.gov.au/docs/doc/48A1D7CE62181DF6CA25785700187502/$FILE/Making%20decisions%20about%20interventions%20V3%20web.pdf. Accessed December 7, 2014. Published 2010.
  16. Ellen ME, Horowitz E, Vaknin S, Lavis JN. Views of health system policymakers on the role of research in health policymaking in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016;5:24. doi:10.1186/s13584-016-0088-1.
  17. Hyder AA, Corluka A, Winch PJ, et al. National policy-makers speak out: are researchers giving them what they need? Health Policy Plan. 2011;26(1):73-82. doi:10.1093/heapol/czq020
  18. Doaee S, Olyaeemanesh A, Emami S, et al. Development and implementation of health technology assessment: a policy study. Iran Journal Public Health. 2013;42(supple 1):50.
  19. Imani-Nasab MH, Seyedin H, Majdzadeh R, Yazdizadeh B, Salehi M. Development of evidence-based health policy documents in developing countries: a case of Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;6(3):27-36.
  20. Imani-Nasab M, Seyedin S, Majdzadeh S, Yazdizadeh B, Salehi M. Factors affecting the development of evidence-based health policy papers at the Ministry of Health Care and Medical Education (Persian). Journal of Health Administration. 2015;18(60):105-117.
  21. Majdzadeh R, Yazdizadeh B, Nedjat S, Gholami J, Ahghari S. Strengthening evidence-based decision-making: is it possible without improving health system stewardship? Health Policy Plann. 2012;27(6):499-504. doi:10.1093/heapol/czr072
  22. Kothari A, Edwards N, Hamel N, Judd M. Is research working for you? Validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research. Implement Sci. 2009;4:46.
  23. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2002.
  24. Thornhill J, Judd M, Clements D. CHSRF knowledge transfer: (re) introducing the self-assessment tool that is helping decision-makers assess their organization's capacity to use research. Healthc Q. 2009;12(1):22-24.
  25. Singh J. Critical appraisal skills programme. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4(1):76.
  26. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383-394.
  27. Lavis JN, Permanand G, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(suppl 1):S13.
  28. Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Fretheim A, Lewin S. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 17: Dealing with insufficient research evidence. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(suppl 1):S17.
  29. Fretheim A, Munabi-Babigumira S, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S. SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 6: Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(suppl 1):S6. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S6
  30. Albert M, Fretheim A, Maïga D. Factors influencing the utilization of research findings by health policy-makers in a developing country: the selection of Mali's essential medicines. Health Research Policy Syst. 2007;5(1):2.
  31. Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14: Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(suppl 1):S14. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S14
  32. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Souza NM, Lewin S, Gruen RL, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(suppl 1):S9. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S9
  33. Nasab MHI, Mohaghegh B, Khalesi N, Jaafaripooyan E. Parallel quality assessment of emergency departments by european foundation for quality management model and iranian national program for hospital evaluation. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(6):610.
  34. Fretheim A, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S. SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(suppl 1):S18.