Evaluating the Implementation and Feasibility of a Web-Based Tool to Support Timely Identification and Care for the Frail Population in Primary Healthcare Settings

Document Type: Study Protocol

Authors

1 Building Research for Integrated Primary Healthcare (BRIC NS), Nova Scotia Primary & Integrated Health Care Innovations Network, Halifax, NS, Canada

2 Primary Care Research Group, Dalhousie Family Medicine, Halifax, NS, Canada

3 Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

4 Primary Health Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada

5 School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

6 Continuing Care, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada

7 Healthy Populations Institute, Halifax, NS, Canada

8 Palliative and Therapeutic Harmonization (PATH) Program, Halifax, NS, Canada

9 Department of Family Practice, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada

Abstract

Background
Understanding and addressing the needs of frail persons is an emerging health priority for Nova Scotia and internationally. Primary healthcare (PHC) providers regularly encounter frail persons in their daily clinical work. However, routine identification and measurement of frailty is not standard practice and, in general, there is a lack of awareness about how to identify and respond to frailty. A web-based tool called the Frailty Portal was developed to aid in identifying, screening, and providing care for frail patients in PHC settings. In this study, we will assess the implementation feasibility and impact of the Frailty Portal to: (1) support increased awareness of frailty among providers and patients, (2) identify the degree of frailty within individual patients, and (3) develop and deliver actions to respond to frailtyl in community PHC practice.
 
Methods
This study will be approached using a convergent mixed method design where quantitative and qualitative
data are collected concurrently, in this case, over a 9-month period, analyzed separately, and then merged to summarize, interpret and produce a more comprehensive understanding of the initiative’s feasibility and scalability. Methods will be informed by the ‘Implementing the Frailty Portal in Community Primary Care Practice’ logic model and questions will be guided by domains and constructs from an implementation science framework, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
 
Discussion
The ‘Frailty Portal’ aims to improve access to, and coordination of, primary care services for persons experiencing frailty. It also aims to increase primary care providers’ ability to care for patients in the context of their frailty. Our goal is to help optimize care in the community by helping community providers gain the knowledge they may lack about frailty both in general and in their practice, support improved identification of frailty with the use of screening tools, offer evidence based severity-specific care goals and connect providers with local available community supports.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Fried LP, Walston J. Frailty and failure to thrive (1487-1502). In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger WH Jr, Halter JB, Ouslander J, eds. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
  2. British Geriatrics Society. Fit for Frailty: Consensus best practice guidelines for the care of older people living with frailty in community and outpatient settings. London: British Geriatrics Society; 2014.
  3. Fairhall N, Sherrington C, Clemson L,  Cameron ID. Do exercise interventions designed to prevent falls affect participation in life roles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2011;40(6):666-674. doi:10.1093/ageing/afr077
  4. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: Implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(3):255-263.
  5. About Us. Nova Scotia Health Authority website. http://www.nshealth.ca/about-us.  Accessed July 28, 2016.
  6. Lee L, Heckman G,  Molnar FJ. Identifying elderly patients at high risk of poor outcomes. Can Fam Physician. 2015;61(3):227-231.
  7. Buckinx F, Rolland Y, Reginster J-Y, Ricour C, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Arch Public Health. 2015;73(1):19. doi:10.1186/s13690-015-0068-x
  8. Rougé Bugat ME, Cestac P, Oustric S, Vellas B, Nourhashemi F. Detecting frailty in primary care: A major challenge for primary care physicians. Journal of J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(8):669-672.doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2012.07.015
  9. Drey M, Wehr H, Wehr G, et al. The frailty syndrome in general practitioner care: a pilot study. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;44(1):48-54. doi:10.1007/s00391-010-0136-3
  10. Lacas A, Rockwood K. Frailty in primary care: A review of its conceptualization and implications for practice. BMC Med. 2012;10:4. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-4
  11. Collins Higgins T, Crosson J, Peikes D, McNellis R, Genevro J, Meyers D. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Using health information technology to support quality improvement in primary care (HRQ Publication No. 15-0031-FF). Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2015.  
  12. De Lepeleire J, Iliffe S, Mann E, Degryse JM. Frailty: An emerging concept for general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(562):e177-e182.
  13. Keiren SM, van Kempen JA, Schers HJ, Olde Rikkert MG, Perry M, Melis RJ. Feasibility evaluation of a stepped procedure to identify community-dwelling frail older people in general practice: A mixed methods study. Eur J Gen Pract. 2012;20(2):107-113. doi:10.3109/13814788.2013.827167
  14. Pialoux T, Goyard J, Lesourd B. Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: A systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12(2):189-197. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00797.x
  15. Braithwaite RS, Fiellin D, Justice AC. The payoff time: A flexible framework to help clinicians decide when patients with comorbid disease are not likely to benefit from practice guidelines. Med Care. 2009;47(6):610-617.
  16. Moorhouse P, Mallery LH. Palliative and therapeutic harmonization: A model for appropriate decision‐making in frail older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(12):2326-2332. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04210.x
  17. Mallery LH, Moorhouse P. Respecting frailty. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(2):126-128.
  18. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
  19. Moorhouse P, Mallory LH. Screening for Frailty: Instructions for Using the FACT. Halifax, NS: Authors; 2015.
  20. Dalhousie University. Clinical Frailty Scale. http://geriatricresearch.medicine.dal.ca/clinical_frailty_scale.htm. Accessed July 29, 2016.
  21. Brooke J. SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL, eds. Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996.
  22. Warner G, Stadnyk R. What is the evidence and context for implementing family-centered care for older adults? Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2014;32(3):255-270. doi:10.3109/02703181.2014.934942
  23. Warner G, Lyons R, Parker V, Phillips S. Advancing coordinated care in four provincial healthcare systems: Evaluating a knowledge-exchange intervention. Healthc Policy. 2011;7(1):80-94.
  24. Ritchie J, Spencer L, Bryman A, Burgess R. Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1994:3.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Volume 6, Issue 7
July 2017
Pages 377-382

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics