Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes – Early Dialogue, Broad Focus and Relevance: A Response to Recent Commentaries

Document Type: Correspondence

Authors

1 Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

2 KIT (Royal Tropical Institute), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3 Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

4 Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

5 Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa

Keywords

Main Subjects


The recent Health Technology Assessment international (HTAi) conference in Rome discussed how we can move ‘towards an integrated HTA framework for a more sustainable healthcare ecosystem’ and improve ‘the role of multi-stakeholder involvement in HTA to face ethical dilemmas for health system’s economic, social and environmental sustainability.’1... (Read more...)

  1. HTAi 2017 annual meeting.  http://www.htai2017.org/.  
  2. Baltussen R, Jansen MP, Mikkelsen E, et al. Priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(11):615-618. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.83
  3. Baltussen R, Paul Maria Jansen M, Bijlmakers L, et al. Value Assessment Frameworks for HTA Agencies: The Organization of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes. Value Health. 2017;20(2):256-260. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.019
  4. Gopinathan U, Ottersen T. Evidence-informed deliberative processes for universal health coverage: broadening the scope: Comment on “Priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017; Forthcoming. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.148
  5. Lauer J, Rajan D, Bertram M. Priority setting for universal health coverage: we need to focus both on substance and on process: Comment on “Priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017; Forthcoming. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.06
  6. Kothari A, McCutcheon C, Graham ID. Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(5):299-300. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.15
  7. Chalkidou K, Li R, Culyer AJ, Glassman A, Hofman KJ, Teerawattananon Y. Health technology assessment: global advocacy and local realities: Comment on "Priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness." Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(4):233-236. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.118
  8. Mikkelsen E, Hontelez JA, Jansen MP, et al. Evidence for scaling up HIV treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: A call for incorporating health system constraints. PLoS Med. 2017;14(2):e1002240. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002240
  9. Hall W. Don’t discount societal value in cost-effectiveness: Comment on “Priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017; Forthcoming. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.03