Knowledge Translation in Healthcare – Towards Understanding its True Complexities; Comment on “Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation”

Document Type: Commentary

Author

University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia

Abstract

This commentary argues that to fully appreciate the complexities of knowledge transfer one firstly has to distinguish between the notions of “data, information, knowledge and wisdom,” and that the latter two are highly context sensitive. In particular one has to understand knowledge as being personal rather than objective, and hence there is no form of knowledge that a-priori is more authoritative than another. Secondly, knowledge transfer in organisations can only be successful if the organisation is organised and managed as a “complex adaptive organisation” – its key characteristics arising from it’s a-priori defined common “purpose, goals and values.” Knowledge transfer, seen as “whole of system/organisation learning,” is highly context sensitive; while the principles may apply to many organisations, knowledge as such is not transferable from one context to another, it always will be a unique learning exercise at this particular point in time in this particular organisation.

Keywords

Main Subjects


"Watch the Video Summary"

  1. Kitson A, Brook A, Harvey G, et al. Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017; forthcoming. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.79
  2. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):517-563. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00105
  3. Joyce J. Williamson on evidence and knowledge. Philosophical Books. 2004;45(4):296-305. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.2004.0356c.x
  4. Compton P. Situated cognition and knowledge acquisition research. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2013;71(2):184-190. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.10.002
  5. Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. London, UK: Routledge; 1958.
  6. Sturmberg JP, Martin CM. Knowing--in medicine. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(5):767-770.    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01011.x
  7. Snowden D. Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2002;6(2):100-111. doi:10.1108/13673270210424639
  8. Kelly T. Evidence. In: Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University; 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/evidence/.  
  9. Sturmberg JP. EBM: a narrow and obsessive methodology that fails to meet the knowledge needs of a complex adaptive clinical world: a commentary on Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G. H. & Ashcroft, R. E. (2009) Cancer Control, 16, 158-168. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(6):917-923. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01321.x
  10. Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1972.
  11. Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125(7):605-613.  doi:10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00011
  12. Moynihan R. Surrogates under scrutiny: fallible correlations, fatal consequences. BMJ.  2011;343:d5160. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5160
  13. Kemp R, Prasad V. Surrogate endpoints in oncology: when are they acceptable for regulatory and clinical decisions, and are they currently overused? BMC Med. 2017;15(1):134. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0902-9
  14. Krumholz HM, Lee TH. Redefining quality--implications of recent clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2537-2539. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0803740
  15. Fernandez A, Sturmberg J, Lukersmith S, et al. Evidence-based medicine: is it a bridge too far? Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:66. doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0057-0
  16. West BJ. Homeostasis and Gauss statistics: barriers to understanding natural variability. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(3):403-408. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01459.x
  17. West BJ. Mathematical Principles: Tales of Tails. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, eds. Handbook of Systems and Complexity in Health. New York: Springer. 2013:63-80.
  18. Rosen R. Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations. New York: Springer; 1985.
  19. Sturmberg JP. The Foundations of Primary Care. Daring to be Different. Oxford San Francisco: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2007
  20. Box GEP, Draper NR. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
  21. Sturmberg J. Health System Redesign: How to Make Health Care Person-Centered, Equitable, and Sustainable. New York: Springer; 2017.