Human Rights and the Tobacco Industry: An Unsuitable Alliance

Document Type: Letter to Editor

Author

Global Health Law Groningen Research Centre, Department of Transboundary Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Keywords

Main Subjects


Dear Editor,

The United Nations (UN), non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and human rights experts have increasingly insisted on the human rights responsibilities of non-state actors including private businesses and multinational corporations... (Read more...)

  1. de Brabandere E. Non-State Actors and Human Rights: Corporate Responsibility and the Attempts to Formalize the Role of Corporations as Participants in the International Legal System. In: Jean d’Aspremont J, ed. Participants in the International Legal System. Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011:268.
  2. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Geneva: United Nations; 2011:35. Report no.: HR/PUB/11/04. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf.  Accessed June 28, 2017.
  3. UN Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. General comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12). UN Doc.: E/C.12/2000/4). Adopted August 11, 2000. http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d0.pdf.  Accessed 29 July 2017.
  4. Crow ME. The human rights responsibilities of multinational tobacco companies. Tob Control. 2005;14: ii14-ii18.
  5. McDaniel PA, Smith EA, Malone, RE. The tobacco endgame: a qualitative review and synthesis. Tob Control. 2016;25:594.
  6. UN Global Compact exists tobacco companies. Statement of 12 September 2017. https://www.uicc.org/un-global-compact-exits-tobacco-companies.
  7. The Danish Institute for Human Rights ends engagement with Philip Morris International. Statement of 4 May 2017. https://www.humanrights.dk/news/human-rights-assessment-philip-morris-international