Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University College of Southeast Norway, Kongsberg, Norway

2 Department of Maritime Operations, University College of Southeast Norway, Kongsberg, Norway

3 Institute for Urban and Regional Research, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

4 Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Abstract

Background
Norway is internationally known today for its political and socio-economic prioritization of equity. The 2012 Public Health Act (PHA) aimed to further equity in the domain of health by addressing the social gradient in health. The PHA’s main policy measures were (1) delegation to the municipal level of responsibility for identifying and targeting underserved groups and (2) the imposition on municipalities of a “Health in All Policies” (HiAP) approach where local policy-making generally is considered in light of public health impact. In addition, the act recommended municipalities employ a public health coordinator (PHC) and required a development of an overview of their citizens’ health to reveal underserved social segments. This study investigates the relationship between changes in municipal use of HiAP tools (PHC and health overviews) with regard to the PHA implementation and municipal prioritization of fair distribution of social and economic resources among social groups.

 
Methods
Data from two surveys, conducted in 2011 and 2014, were merged with official register data. All Norwegian municipalities were included (N = 428). Descriptive statistics as well as bi- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

 
Results
Thirty-eight percent of the municipalities reported they generally considered fair distribution among social groups in local policy-making, while 70% considered fair distribution in their local health promotion initiatives. Developing health overviews after the PHA’s implementation was positively associated with prioritizing fair distribution in political decision-making (odds ratio [OR] = 2.54; CI: 1.12-5.76), compared to municipalities that had not developed such overviews. However, the employment of PHCs after the implementation was negatively associated with prioritizing fair distribution in local health promotion initiatives (OR = 0.22; CI: 0.05-0.90), compared to municipalities without that position.

 
Conclusion
Development of health overviews as requested by the PHA — may contribute to prioritization of fair distribution among social groups with regard to the social determinants of health at the local level.

Highlights

Commentaries Published on this Paper

  • Understanding the Promotion of Health Equity at the Local Level Requires Far More than Quantitative Analyses of Yes-No Survey Data; Comment on “Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups”

            Abstract | PDF

  • Challenging Institutional Norms to Improve Local-Level Policy for Health and Health Equity; Comment on “Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups”

            Abstract | PDF

  • Public Health Coordinator – How to Promote Focus on Social Inequality at a Local Level, and How Should It Be Included in Public Health Policies?; Comment on “Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups”

            Abstract | PDF

  • Rethinking the Theory of Change for Health in All Policies; Comment on “Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway: The Use of Public Health Coordinators and Health Overviews to Promote Fair Distribution Among Social Groups”

            Abstract | PDF

 

Authors' Response to the Commentaries

  • Health Promotion at Local Level in Norway – Who, What, When, and How: A Response to Recent Commentaries

            Abstract | PDF

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. World Health Organization. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  2. Raphael D. Tackling Health Inequalities: Lessons from International Experiences. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press; 2012.
  3. Marmot M. Fair society, Healthy lives: the Marmot Review: strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. London: The Marmot Review; 2010.
  4. Marmot M. The health gap: The Challenge of an Unequal World. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc; 2015.
  5. Stiglitz JE. The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. New York: Norton; 2015.
  6. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.
  7. Dahl E, Bergsli H, van der Wel KA. Sosial ulikhet i helse: en norsk kunnskapsoversikt. Oslo: Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus; 2014.
  8. Mackenbach JP. The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states: the explanation of a paradox. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(4):761-769. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.031
  9. Popham F, Dibben C, Bambra C. Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(5):412-418. doi:10.1136/jech-2012-201525
  10. Fosse E. Norwegian public health policy: revitalization of the social democratic welfare state? Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(2):287-300. doi:10.2190/HS.39.2.d
  11. Cook S, Leppo K, Ollila E, Pena S, Wismar M. Health in all policies: seizing opportunities, implementing policies. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2013.
  12. Stahl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K. Health in all policies: prospects and potentials. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2006.
  13. Carey G, Crammond B, Keast R. Creating change in government to address the social determinants of health: how can efforts be improved? BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1087. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1087
  14. Kickbusch I, Gleicher D. Governance for Health in the 21st Century. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012.
  15. Hofstad H. The ambition of Health in All Policies in Norway: The role of political leadership and bureaucratic change. Health Policy. 2016;120(5):567-575. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.001
  16. Ministry of Health and Care Services. The Norwegian Public Health Act. Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2011.
  17. Fosse E. Norwegian experiences. In: Raphael D, ed. Tackling health inequalities. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press; 2012:185-208.
  18. Ministry of Health and Care Services. Prop.90 L (2010-2011) Proposisjon til Stortinget (forslag til lovvedtak); 2011.
  19. Wilkinson R, Marmot M. Social Determinants of Health. 2ed ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  20. van der Wel KA, Dahl E, Bergsli H. The Norwegian policy to reduce health inequalities: key challenges. Nordisk Välfärdsforskning. 2016;1(1):19-29. doi:10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2016-01-03
  21. Fosse E. Kommunenes rolle i å utjevne sosiale helseforskjeller–Norge som eksempel. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift. 2016;93(5):492-500.
  22. Tallarek nee Grimm MJ, Helgesen MK, Fosse E. Reducing social inequities in health in Norway: concerted action at state and local levels? Health Policy. 2013;113(3):228-235. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.019
  23. Norwegian Directorate of Health. Good Overview  - a condition for good public health. A guide for overview of health situation and determinants on health. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate of Health; 2013.
  24. Hofstad H, Vestby GM. Lokalt folkehelsearbeid: underveisevaluering av Helse i plan og Partnerskap for folkehelse. Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning; 2009:102.
  25. Hagen S, Helgesen M, Torp S, Fosse E. Health in All Policies: A cross-sectional study of the public health coordinators' role in Norwegian municipalities. Scand J Public Health. 2015;43(6):597-605. doi:10.1177/1403494815585614
  26. Helgesen MK, Fosse E, Hagen S. Capacity to reduce inequities in health in Norwegian municipalities. Scand J Public Health. 2017;45(18 suppl):77-82. doi:10.1177/1403494817709412
  27. Pallant J. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Open University Press; 2010.
  28. Vestby GM, Hofstad H, Helgesen MK, et al. Partnarskap for folkehelse og Helse i plan. Sluttrapport: Moreforsking Volda; 2010.
  29. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Background document to WHO - Strategy paper for Europe. Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies; 1991.
  30. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Utjevning av helseforskjeller: Del 2: Strategier og tiltak for å utjevne sosiale ulikheter i helse. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2009.
  31. Raphael D. Challenges to promoting health in the modern welfare state: the case of the Nordic nations. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(1):7-17. doi:10.1177/1403494813506522
  32. Sellers JM, Lidstrom A. Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State. Governance. 2007;20(4):609-632. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x
  33. Christensen T, Laegreid P. The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform. Public Adm Rev. 2007;67(6):1059-1066. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
  34. Hanssen GS, Helgesen MK. Multi‐level governance in Norway: universalism in elderly and mental health care services. Int J Sociol Soc Policy. 2011;31(3/4):160-172. doi:doi:10.1108/01443331111120609
  35. Carey G, Crammond B. Systems change for the social determinants of health. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):662. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1979-8
  36. Fosse E, Helgesen M. Advocating for health promotion policy in Norway: the role of the county municipalities. Societies. 2017;7(2):5. doi:10.3390/soc7020005
  37. Ministry of Health and Care Services. National strategy to reduce social inequalities in health. Report no.20 (2006-2007) to the Storting. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2006.
  38. Kiland C, Kvale G, Torjesen DO. The Ideas and Implementation of Public Health Policies: The Norwegian Case. In: Waldorff SB, Pedersen AR, Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E, eds. Managing Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015:9-25.
  39. Helgesen M, Hofstad H. Determinants in Norwegian local health promotion- institutional perspectives. In: Kronenfeld JJ, ed. Research on the Sociology of Health. Bingley: Emerald; 2014.
  40. Hjelmtveit V. Sosialpolitikk i historisk perspektiv. Velferdsstaten i endring Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2009:29-66.
  41. Riksrevisjonen. Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av norsk folkehelsearbeid. Oslo: Riksrevisjonen; 2015.
  42. Diderichsen F, Scheele CE, Little IG. Tackling health inequalities: the Scandinavian Experience. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen; 2015.
  43. Hagen S, Torp S, Helgesen M, Fosse E. Promoting health by addressing living conditions in Norwegian municipalities. Health Promot Int. 2017;32(6):977-987. doi:10.1093/heapro/daw052
  44. Ministry of Health and Care Services. Report No. 16(2002-03): Perscriptions for a healthier Norway. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2003.
  45. Helgesen M, Hofstad H. Regionalt og lokalt folkehelsearbeid : ressurser, organisering og koordinering: en baselineundersokelse. Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning; 2012.
  46. Helgesen M, Hofstad H, Risan L, et al. Folkehelse og forebygging. Målgrupper og strategier i kommuner og fylkeskommuner. NIBR-rapport 2014:3. Norwegian Institute of Urban and Regional Research Oslo; 2014.
  47. Schou A, Helgesen M, Hofstad H. Samhandlingsreformens effekt på kommunen som helsefremmende og sykdomsforebyggende aktør. En nasjonal oversikt over status i kommuner to år etter reformoppstart med et spesielt blikk på innvandrerrike kommuner: Norsk institutt for by-og regionforskning Oslo; 2014.
  48. Schou A, Hofstad H. The effect of the Coordination Reform on the municipalites as actors in public health and disease prevention. Final report project 229628. Oslo: HSN/NIBR; 2016.
  49. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155-159.
  50. Vissner PE, Krosnick JA, Lavraks PJ. Methods in Social and Personality Psychology.  In: Reis HT, Judd CM, eds. Handbook of research. Cambridge University Press; 2000.