Understanding the Role of Values in Health Policy Decision-Making From the Perspective of Policy-Makers and Stakeholders: A Multiple-Case Embedded Study in Chile and Colombia

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

2 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

3 Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

4 Health Policy Ph.D. Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

5 Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia

6 Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

7 Africa Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

8 Business School, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

Background
Chile and Colombia are examples of Latin American countries with health systems shaped by similar values. Recently, both countries have crafted policies to regulate the participation of private for-profit insurance companies in their health systems, but through very different mechanisms. This study asks: what values are important in the decision-making processes that crafted these policies? And how and why are they used?

 
Methods
An embedded multiple-case study design was carried out for 2 specific decisions in each country: (1) in Chile, the development of the Universal Plan of Explicit Entitlements - AUGE/GES - and mandating universal coverage of treatments for high-cost diseases; and (2) in Colombia, the declaration of health as a fundamental right and a mechanism to explicitly exclude technologies that cannot be publicly funded. We interviewed key informants involved in one or more of the decisions and/or in the policy analysis and development process that contributed to the eventual decision. The data analysis involved a constant comparative approach and thematic analysis for each case study.

 
Results
From the 40 individuals who were invited, 28 key informants participated. A tension between 2 important values was identified for each decision (eg, solidarity vs. individualism for the AUGE/GES plan in Chile; human dignity vs. sustainability for the declaration of the right to health in Colombia). Policy-makers used values in the decisionmaking process to frame problems in meaningful ways, to guide policy development, as a pragmatic instrument to make decisions, and as a way to legitimize decisions. In Chile, values such as individualism and free choice were incorporated in decision-making because attaining private health insurance was seen as an indicator of improved personal economic status. In Colombia, human dignity was incorporated as the core value because the Constitutional Court asserted its importance in its use of judicial activism as a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches.

 
Conclusion
There is an opportunity to open further exploration of the role of values in different health decisions, political sectors besides health, and even other jurisdictions.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Schwartz B. The creation and destruction of value. Am Psychol. 1990;45(1):7-15. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.1.7
  2. Hoffman SJ, Røttingen JA, Lavis JN, Edge JS, Frenk J. Background paper on conceptual issues related to health systems research to inform a WHO global strategy on health systems research. https://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/alliancehpsr_backgroundpaperhsrstrat1.pdf.  Published February 2012.
  3. Veillard JH, Brown AD, Barış E, Permanand G, Klazinga NS. Health system stewardship of National Health Ministries in the WHO European region: concepts, functions and assessment framework. Health Policy. 2011;103(2-3):191-199. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.09.002
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). The World Health Report 2008 - primary Health Care (Now More Than Ever). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2008.
  5. Beck C. Learning to live the good life: values in adulthood. Toronto: OISE Press; 1993.
  6. Kenny N, Giacomini M. Wanted: a new ethics field for health policy analysis. Health Care Anal. 2005;13(4):247-260. doi:10.1007/s10728-005-8123-3
  7. Giacomini M, Hurley J, Gold I, Smith P, Abelson J. ‘Values’ In Canadian Health Policy Analysis: What Are We Talking About? Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2001.
  8. Clark MA. The meanings of universal health care in Latin America. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015;40(1):221-226. doi:10.1215/03616878-2854795
  9. Lavados Montes C, Gajardo Ugás A. El principio de justicia y la salud en Chile. Acta Bioeth. 2008;14(2):206-211. doi:10.4067/S1726-569X2008000200011
  10. Pontes AP, Oliveira DC, Gomes AM. The principles of the Brazilian Unified Health System, studied based on similitude analysis. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014;22(1):59-67. doi:10.1590/0104-1169.2925.2395
  11. Ugalde A, Homedes N. [Neoliberal health sector reforms in Latin America: unprepared managers and unhappy workers]. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005;17(3):202-209. doi:10.1590/s1020-49892005000300011
  12. Bustamante AV, Méndez CA. Health care privatization in Latin America: comparing divergent privatization approaches in Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014;39(4):841-886. doi:10.1215/03616878-2743063
  13. Londoño JL, Frenk J. Structured pluralism: towards an innovative model for health system reform in Latin America. Health Policy. 1997;41(1):1-36.
  14. Bastías G, Pantoja T, Leisewitz T, Zárate V. Health care reform in Chile. CMAJ. 2008;179(12):1289-1292. doi:10.1503/cmaj.071843
  15. Paraje G, Vásquez F. Health equity in an unequal country: the use of medical services in Chile. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11:81. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-81
  16. Bitrán R, Muñoz R, Escobar L, Farah C. Governing a hybrid mandatory health insurance system: the case of Chile. In: Savedoff WD, Gottret P, eds. Governing Mandatory Health Insurance. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2008:161-201.
  17. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Perfil del Sistema de Servicios de Salud Chile. http://new.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2010/Perfil_Sistema_Salud-Chile_2002.pdf.  Accessed March 25, 2018. Published 2002.
  18. Vásquez F, Paraje G, Estay M. Income-related inequality in health and health care utilization in Chile, 2000-2009. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33(2):98-106. doi:10.1590/s1020-49892013000200004
  19. Yamin AE, Parra-Vera O. Judicial protection of the right to health in Colombia: from social demands to individual claims to public debates. Hastings Int Comp Law Rev. 2010;33(2):101-129.
  20. Landau D. A dynamic theory of judicial role. Boston Coll Law Rev. 2014;55(5):1501-1562.
  21. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc; 2014.
  22. Ishak NM, Abu Bakar AY. Developing sampling frame for case study: challenges and conditions. World J Educ. 2014;4(3):29-35. doi:10.5430/wje.v4n3p29
  23. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc; 2011.
  24. Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Pearson Education Inc; 2011.
  25. Lazar H, Forest PG, Lavis JN, Church J. Paradigm Freeze: Why It Is So Hard to Reform Health Care in Canada. 1st ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press; 2013.
  26. El Mostrador. Bachelet anuncia la “Ley Ricarte Soto” que crea un Fondo Especial de Medicamentos de Alto Costo. El Mostrador; 2014. http://www.elmostrador.cl/noticias/pais/2014/05/21/bachelet-anuncia-la-ley-ricarte-soto-que-crea-un-fondo-especial-de-medicamentos-de-alto-costo/.  Published May 21, 2014.
  27. Defensoría del Pueblo de Colombia. La tutela y el derecho a la salud 2014. Bogotá: Defensoría del Pueblo; 2015.
  28. El Tiempo. Cada 3,5 minutos se presenta una tutela por la salud. http://www.defensoria.gov.co/es/nube/enlosmedios/5911/Cada-35-minutos-se-presenta-una-tutela-por-la-salud.htm.  Published 2016.
  29. Congreso de la República de Colombia. Ley 1751 de 2015. Colombia: Congreso de la República de Colombia; 2015:1-13.
  30. Ministerio de Salud y Potección Social. Resolución 330. Colombia: Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social; 2017.
  31. Landau D. Political institutions and judicial role in comparative constitutional law. Harvard Int Law J. 2010;51(2):319-377.
  32. Hawkins B, Alvarez Rosete A. Judicialization and Health Policy in Colombia: The Implications for Evidence-Informed Policymaking. Policy Stud J. 2017. doi:10.1111/psj.12230
  33. Fernández-Gutiérrez M, Van de Walle S. Equity or Efficiency? Explaining Public Officials' Values. Public Adm Rev. 2019;79(1):25-34. doi:10.1111/puar.12996