Cultivating Value Co-Creation in Health System Research; Comment on “Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering with University-Based Researchers in Canada – A Call to Re-imagine Research”

Document Type: Commentary

Authors

1 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia

2 Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Alfred Health Partnership, Institute for Health Transformation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

3 Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Monash Health Partnership, Institute for Health Transformation, Clayton, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Partnerships have various purposes and exist in many configurations. Although there has been a refocusing in health system research on forming strategic partnerships between researchers and knowledge users (KUs) to maximise the relevance and uptake of research in practice; research knowledge frequently fails to reach KUs nor impact the community served. Whilst there have been many attempts to engage KUs, researchers and decisionmakers often promote a top down approach that has lacked insight into KUs’ specific needs and values. Bowen and colleagues uncovered a plethora of negative experiences from a group of Canadian health leaders involved in researcher partnerships. Their comments reflect their experiences seemingly at an earlier stage of a partnership so we were not surprised by their pessimism. However, our experience reflects an established research-health service partnership network where we collaborate and co-create for mutual benefit and with a shared purpose. The reason for its sustained success over several decades is the focus on co-creation of value between stakeholders. Reimagining must prioritise a paradigm shift towards value co-creation if partnerships are to create opportunities for innovation, productivity and impact.

Keywords


  1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: How will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326-e1000326. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
  2. Parent R, Roy M, St-Jacques D. A systems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2007;11(6):81-93. doi:10.1108/13673270710832181
  3. Bucknall T, Hitch D. Connections, communication and collaboration in healthcare’s complex adaptive systems: Comment on “using complexity and network concepts to inform healthcare knowledge translation.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(6):556-559. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.138
  4. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323(7313):625-628. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625
  5. Bowen S, Botting I, Graham ID, et al. Experience of health leadership in partnering with university-based researchers in Canada: A call to "re-imagine" research. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(12):684-699. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.66
  6. Sibbald SL, Kang H, Graham ID. Collaborative health research partnerships: a survey of researcher and knowledge-user attitudes and perceptions. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):92. doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0485-3
  7. Himmelman AT. On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: Collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. Am J Community Psychol. 2001;29(2):277-284.
  8. Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392-429. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12197
  9. Felin T, Hesterly WS. The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Acad Manage Rev. 2007;32(1):195-218. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.23464020
  10. Janamian T, Crossland L, Jackson CL. Embracing value co‐creation in primary care services research: A framework for success. Med J Aust. 2016;204:S5-S11. doi:10.5694/mja16.00112