Progressive Realisation of Universal Health Coverage in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Beyond the “Best Buys”

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland

2 Science Division, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Background
World Health Organization Choosing Interventions that are Cost-Effective (WHO CHOICE) has been a programme of the WHO for 20 years. In this latest update, we present for the first time a cross programme analysis of the comparative cost-effectiveness of 479 intervention scenarios across 20 disease programmes and risk factors.
 
Methods
This analysis follows the standard WHO CHOICE approach to generalized cost-effectiveness analysis applied to two regions, Eastern sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. The scope of the analysis is all interventions included in programme specific WHO CHOICE analyses, using WHO treatment guidelines for major disease areas as the foundation. Costs are measured in 2010 international dollars, and benefits modelled beginning in 2010, or the nearest year for which validated data was available, both for a period of 100 years.
 
Results
Across both regions included in the analysis, interventions span multiple orders of magnitude in terms of cost-effectiveness ratios. A health benefit package optimized through a value for money lens incorporates interventions responding to all of the main drivers of disease burden. Interventions delivered through first level clinical and nonclinical services represent the majority of the high impact cost-effective interventions.
 
Conclusion
Cost-effectiveness is one important criterion when selecting health interventions for benefit packages to progress towards universal health coverage (UHC), but it is not the only criterion and all calculations should be adapted to the local context. To support country decision-makers, WHO CHOICE has developed a downloadable tool to support the development of data for this criterion.

Keywords


  1. Lauer JA, Rajan D, Bertram MY. Priority Setting for universal health coverage: we need to focus both on substance and on process: Comment on "priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness." Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(10):601-603. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.06.
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Together on the Road to Universal Health Coverage. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Strategizing National Health in the 21st Century: A Handbook. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
  4. Garber AM, Phelps CE. Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ. 1997;16(1):1-31. doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00506-1
  5. Bertram MY, Lauer JA, De Joncheere K, et al. Cost-effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(12):925-930. doi:10.2471/blt.15.164418
  6. World Health Organization (WHO). Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
  7. Terwindt F, Rajan D, Soucat A. Priority-setting for national health policies, strategies and plans. In: Strategizing National Health in the 21st Century: A Handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
  8. Baltussen R, Jansen MPM, Bijlmakers L, et al. Value assessment frameworks for HTA agencies: the organization of evidence-informed deliberative processes. Value Health. 2017;20(2):256-260. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.019
  9. Angelis A, Kanavos P. Value-based assessment of new medical technologies: towards a robust methodological framework for the application of multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(5):435-446. doi:10.1007/s40273-015-0370-z
  10. Hutubessy R, Chisholm D, Edejer TT. Generalized cost-effectiveness analysis for national-level priority-setting in the health sector. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003;1(1):8. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-1-8
  11. Hogan DR, Baltussen R, Hayashi C, Lauer JA, Salomon JA. Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies to combat HIV/AIDS in developing countries. BMJ. 2005;331(7530):1431-1437. doi:10.1136/bmj.38643.368692.68
  12. Evans DB, Edejer TT, Adam T, Lim SS. Methods to assess the costs and health effects of interventions for improving health in developing countries. BMJ. 2005;331(7525):1137-1140. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1137
  13. Adam T, Lim SS, Mehta S, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. BMJ. 2005;331(7525):1107. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1107
  14. Edejer TT, Aikins M, Black R, Wolfson L, Hutubessy R, Evans DB. Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for child health in developing countries. BMJ. 2005;331(7526):1177. doi:10.1136/bmj.38652.550278.7C
  15. Baltussen R, Floyd K, Dye C. Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for tuberculosis control in developing countries. BMJ. 2005;331(7529):1364. doi:10.1136/bmj.38645.660093.68
  16. Ginsberg GM, Lauer JA, Zelle S, Baeten S, Baltussen R. Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 2012;344:e614. doi:10.1136/bmj.e614
  17. Ortegón M, Lim S, Chisholm D, Mendis S. Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and tobacco use in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 2012;344:e607. doi:10.1136/bmj.e607
  18. Chisholm D, Saxena S. Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat neuropsychiatric conditions in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 2012;344:e609. doi:10.1136/bmj.e609
  19. United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/.  Accessed July 2015. Published 2015.
  20. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Observatory. http://gamapserver.who.int/gho/interactive_charts/mbd/life_expectancy/atlas.html.
  21. Bertram MY, Stenberg K, Brindley C, et al. Disease control programme support costs: an update of WHO-CHOICE methodology, price databases and quantity assumptions. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2017;15:21. doi:10.1186/s12962-017-0083-6
  22. Serje J, Bertram MY, Brindley C, Lauer JA. Global health worker salary estimates: an econometric analysis of global earnings data. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018;16:10. doi:10.1186/s12962-018-0093-z
  23. Stenberg K, Lauer JA, Gkountouras G, Fitzpatrick C, Stanciole A. Econometric estimation of WHO-CHOICE country-specific costs for inpatient and outpatient health service delivery. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018;16:11. doi:10.1186/s12962-018-0095-x
  24. Ralaidovy AH, Bachani AM, Lauer JA, Lai T, Chisholm D. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent road traffic injuries in eastern sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: new results from WHO-CHOICE. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018;16:59. doi:10.1186/s12962-018-0161-4
  25. Ralaidovy AH, Gopalappa C, Ilbawi A, Pretorius C, Lauer JA. Cost-effective interventions for breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colorectal cancer: new results from WHO-CHOICE. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018;16:38. doi:10.1186/s12962-018-0157-0
  26. Bertram MY, Lauer JA, Stenberg K, Edejer TTT. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care interventions for priority setting in the health system: An update from WHO CHOICE. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020; In Press. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.244  
  27. Stenberg K, Watts R, Bertram MY, Engesveen K, Maliqi B, Say L, Hutubessy R. Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Outcomes: A WHO-CHOICE Analysis for Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia. Int J Health Policy Manag.. 2020; In Press.
  28. Ralaidovy AH, Lauer JA, Pretorius C, Briët OJ, Patouillard E. Priority setting in HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria – New cost-effectiveness results from WHO-CHOICE. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020; In Press. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.251
  29. Stenberg K, Hanssen O, Edejer TT, et al. Financing transformative health systems towards achievement of the health Sustainable Development Goals: a model for projected resource needs in 67 low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(9):e875-e887. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30263-2
  30. Bertram MY, Chisholm D, Watts R, Waqanivalu T, Prasad V, Varghese C. Cost-effectiveness of population level and individual level interventions to combat non-communicable disease in Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: a WHO-CHOICE analysis. Int J Health Pol Manag. 2020; In Press.
  31. Stenberg K, Hanssen O, Bertram M, et al. Guide posts for investment in primary health care and projected resource needs in 67 low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(11):e1500-e1510. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30416-4
  32. Sparkes SP, Kutzin J, Earle AJ. Financing common goods for health: a country agenda. Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(4):322-333. doi:10.1080/23288604.2019.1659126
  33. Drummond M, Torrance G, Mason J. Cost-effectiveness league tables: more harm than good? Soc Sci Med. 1993;37(1):33-40. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90315-u
  34. Jamison DT, Alwan A, Mock CN, et al. Universal health coverage and intersectoral action for health: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1108-1120. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32906-9
  35. Rehfuess EA, Stratil JM, Scheel IB, Portela A, Norris SL, Baltussen R. The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(Suppl 1):e000844. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000844