Document Type : Original Article
Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
School of Allied Health Science and Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
RegNet School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Debate continues in public health on the roles of universal or targeted policies in providing equity of access to health- related goods or services, and thereby contributing to health equity. Research examining policy implementation can provide fresh insights on these issues.
We synthesised findings across case studies of policy implementation in four policy areas of primary healthcare (PHC), telecommunications, Indigenous health and land use policy, which incorporated a variety of universal and targeted policy structures. We analysed findings according to three criteria of equity in access – availability, affordability and acceptability – and definitions of universal, proportionate-universal, targeted and residual policies, and devolved governance structures.
Our analysis showed that existing universal, proportionate-universal and targeted policies in an Australian context displayed strengths and weaknesses in addressing availability, affordability and acceptability dimensions of equity in access.
While residualist policies are unfavourable to equity of access, other forms of targeting as well as universal and proportionate-universal structure have the potential to be combined in context-specific ways favourable to equity of access to health-related goods and services. To optimise benefits, policies should address equity of access in the three dimensions of availability, affordability and acceptability. Devolved governance structures have the potential to augment equity benefits of either universal or targeted policies.
Commentaries Published on this Paper
- Resisting the Effects of Neoliberalism on Public Policy; Comment on “Implementing Universal and Targeted Policies for Health Equity: Lessons From Australia”
Abstract | PDF
- Policies for Social and Health Equity: The Case for Equity Sensitive Universalism; Comment on “Implementing Universal and Targeted Policies for Health Equity: Lessons From Australia”
Abstract | PDF