Conditional Cash Transfers for Maternal Health Interventions: Factors Influencing Uptake in North-Central Nigeria

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Primary Healthcare Systems Development, National Primary Health Care Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria

2 Presidential Initiative for the North East (PINE), Abuja, Nigeria

3 Department of Planning, Research and Statistics, National Primary Health Care Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria

4 Centre for Health Policy, Wits School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

5 Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Abstract

Background
Nigeria accounts for a significant proportion of global maternal mortality figures with little progress made in curbing poor health indices. In a bid to reverse this trend, the Government of Nigeria initiated a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme to encourage pregnant women utilize services at designated health facilities. This study aims to understand experiences of women who register for CCT services and explore reasons behind non-uptake of those women who do not register.

 
Methods
We conducted this study in a rural community in North Central Nigeria. Having identified programme beneficiaries by randomly sampling contact details obtained from the programme database, using snowball sampling method we sourced non-beneficiaries list based on recommendations from beneficiaries and other community members. Thereafter we undertook semi-structured interviews on both beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries and analysed data obtained thematically.

 
Results
Our findings revealed that, while beneficiaries of the programme were influenced by the cash transfers, cash may not be sufficient incentive for uptake by non-beneficiaries of CCT in Nigeria. Factors such as community and spousal influence, availability of free drugs, proximity to health facility are critical factors that affect uptake in our study context. On the other hand, poor programme administration, mistrust for government initiatives as well as poor quality of services could significantly constrain service utilization despite cash transfers.

 
Conclusion
Considering that a number of barriers to uptake of the CCT programme are similar to barriers to maternal health services, it is essential that maternal health services are available, accessible and of acceptable quality to target recipients for CCT programmes to reach their full implementation potential.

Highlights

Supplementary File 1 (Download)

Keywords

Main Subjects

Full Text

اا

References

  1. Chen C, Jeruss S, Chapman JS, et al. Long-term functional impact of congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair on children. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(4):657-665. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.12.013
  2. Fiszbein A, Schady N, Ferreira FH, et al. Conditional cash transfers : reducing present and future poverty. Washington, DC: The World Bank Publications; 2009.
  3. Adato M, Hoddinott J. Conditional cash transfers in Latin America. International Food Policy Research Institute; 2010.
  4. de Janvry A, Sadoulet E. Conditional cash transfer programs for child human capital development: Lessons derived from experience in Mexico and Brazil. Paper presented at: GRADE 25th Anniversary Conference,“Investigación, Politicas y Desarrollo,”2005; Lima, Peru.
  5. Fenwick TB. Avoiding governors: federalism, democracy, and poverty alleviation in Brazil and Argentina. Yokohama, Japan; 2014.
  6. Szwarcberg M. Avoiding governors: federalism, democracy, and poverty alleviation in Brazil and Argentina, by Tracy Beck Fenwick. Rev Can Etudes Dev. 2018;39(1):155-156. doi:10.1080/02255189.2017.1301893
  7. Lagarde M, Haines A, Palmer N. The impact of conditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(4):Cd008137. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008137
  8. Rawlings LB, Rubio GM. Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. World Bank Res Obs. 2005;20(1):29-55.
  9. Maluccio J, Flores R. Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: The Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social. International Food Policy Research Institute; 2005.
  10. Lim SS, Dandona L, Hoisington JA, James SL, Hogan MC, Gakidou E. India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010;375(9730):2009-2023. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60744-1
  11. Lagarde M, Haines A, Palmer N. Conditional cash transfers for improving uptake of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(16):1900-1910. doi:10.1001/jama.298.16.1900
  12. Powell-Jackson T, Hanson K. Financial incentives for maternal health: impact of a national programme in Nepal. J Health Econ. 2012;31(1):271-284. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.010
  13. Villanger E. Cash Transfers Contributing to Social Protection: A Synthesis of Evaluation Findings. Oslo, Norge: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation; 2008.
  14. Sharma P, Semwal J, Kishore S. A comparative study of utilization of Janani Suraksha Yojana (maternity benefit scheme) in rural areas and urban slums. Indian J Community Health. 2011;22(2):11-14.
  15. Kaushik A, Mishra CP, Kesharwani P, Richa, Hussain MA. Awareness about JSY among reproductive age women in a rural area of Varanasi. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2010;41(3-4):158-161.
  16. Sidney K, Diwan V, El-Khatib Z, de Costa A. India's JSY cash transfer program for maternal health: who participates and who doesn't--a report from Ujjain district. Reprod Health. 2012;9:2. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-9-2
  17. Rai SK, Dasgupta R, Das MK, Singh S, Devi R, Arora NK. Determinants of utilization of services under MMJSSA scheme in Jharkhand 'Client Perspective': a qualitative study in a low performing state of India. Indian J Public Health. 2011;55(4):252-259. doi:10.4103/0019-557x.92400
  18. Okoli U, Morris L, Oshin A, Pate MA, Aigbe C, Muhammad A. Conditional cash transfer schemes in Nigeria: potential gains for maternal and child health service uptake in a national pilot programme. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:408. doi:10.1186/s12884-014-0408-9
  19. Waters WF. Qualitative methods for assessing conditional cash-transfer programmes: the case of Panama. Dev Pract. 2010;20(6):678-689. doi:10.1080/09614524.2010.491526
  20. Powell-Jackson T, Morrison J, Tiwari S, Neupane BD, Costello AM. The experiences of districts in implementing a national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in Nepal. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:97. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-97
  21. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF International. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF International; 2014.
  22. Ojanuga DN, Gilbert C. Women's access to health care in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(4):613-617.
  23. Lopez KA, Willis DG. Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(5):726-735. doi:10.1177/1049732304263638
  24. Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press; 2012.
  25. Adedayo AK, Sanda AY. Mystical Powers of Witchcraft Among the Gbagyis. Ilorin Journal of Religious Studies. 2011;1(1):77-92.
  26. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  27. Vellakkal S, Reddy H, Gupta A, Chandran A, Fledderjohann J, Stuckler D. A qualitative study of factors impacting accessing of institutional delivery care in the context of India's cash incentive program. Soc Sci Med. 2017;178:55-65. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.059
  28. White H, Masset E. Assessing interventions to improve child nutrition: a theory‐based impact evaluation of the Bangladesh Integrated Nutrition Project. J Int Dev. 2007;19(5):627-652. doi:10.1002/jid.1344
  29. Leatherman TL. A biocultural perspective on health and household economy in southern Peru. Med Anthropol Q. 1996;10(4):476-495.
  30. Medlin C, de Walque D. Potential Applications Of Conditional Cash Transfers For Prevention Of Sexually Transmitted Infections And HIV In Sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Research Working Paper; 2008. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-4673
  31. Powell-Jackson T, Neupane BD, Tiwari S, Tumbahangphe K, Manandhar D, Costello AM. The impact of Nepal's national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in the district of Makwanpur. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2009;21:221-249.
  32. Adato M, Roopnaraine T, Becker E. Understanding use of health services in conditional cash transfer programs: insights from qualitative research in Latin America and Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(12):1921-1929. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.032
  33. Caldwell JC. Education as a Factor in Mortality Decline An Examination of Nigerian Data. Popul Stud. 1979;33(3):395-413. doi:10.2307/2173888
  34. Leslie J, Gupta GR. Utilization of formal services for maternal nutrition and health care. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 1989.
  35. Stock R. Distance and the utilization of health facilities in rural Nigeria. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(9):563-570.
  36. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(2):69-79.
  37. O'Donnell O. Access to health care in developing countries: breaking down demand side barriers. Cad Saude Publica. 2007;23(12):2820-2834.
  38. Eboreime E, Abimbola S, Bozzani F. Access to Routine Immunization: A Comparative Analysis of Supply-Side Disparities between Northern and Southern Nigeria. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144876. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144876
  39. Poole DL, Carlton TO. A model for analyzing utilization of maternal and child health services. Health Soc Work. 1986;11(3):209-222.
  40. Abimbola S, Okoli U, Olubajo O, Abdullahi MJ, Pate MA. The midwives service scheme in Nigeria. PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001211. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001211
  41. Raven JH, Tolhurst RJ, Tang S, van den Broek N. What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care? Midwifery. 2012;28(5):e676-683. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.003
  42. Andaleeb SS. Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(9):1359-1370. 
  43. Haddad S, Fournier P, Machouf N, Yatara F. What does quality mean to lay people? Community perceptions of primary health care services in Guinea. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(3):381-394.
  44. Graham WJ, McCaw-Binns A, Munjanja S. Translating coverage gains into health gains for all women and children: the quality care opportunity. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001368. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001368
  45. Hatt LE, Makinen M, Madhavan S, Conlon CM. Effects of user fee exemptions on the provision and use of maternal health services: a review of literature. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;31(4 Suppl 2):67-80.
  46. Cecchini S, Martinez R. Inclusive social protection in Latin America: a comprehensive, rights-based approach. CEPAL; 2012.

Files

History

  • Received Date: 22 October 2017
  • Revised Date: 08 June 2018
  • Accepted Date: 10 June 2018
  • First Published Date: 01 October 2018
  • Published Date: 01 October 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics