TY - JOUR ID - 3470 TI - Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management JA - IJHPM LA - en SN - AU - Williams, Iestyn AU - Brown, Hilary AU - Healy, Paul AD - Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK AD - NHS Confederation, London, UK Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 VL - 7 IS - 8 SP - 683 EP - 695 KW - Healthcare Decision-Making KW - Cost KW - Quality KW - Literature Review KW - Health Management DO - 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.09 N2 - Background Decisions affecting cost and quality are taken across health and care but investigation of the mediating role of context in these is in its infancy. This paper presents a synthesis of the evidence on the contextual factors that influence ‘decisions of value’ – defined as those characterised by having a significant and demonstrable impact on both quality and resources – in health and care. The review considers the full range of resource/quality decisions and synthesises knowledge on the contextual drivers of these.   Methods The method involved structured evidence review and narrative synthesis. Literature was identified through searches of electronic databases (HMIC, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, NHS Evidence, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, ABI Inform/Proquest), journal and bibliography hand-searching and snowball searching using citation analysis. Structured data extraction was performed drawing out descriptive information and content against review aims and questions. Data synthesis followed a thematic approach in accordance with the varied nature of the retrieved literature.   Results Twenty-one literature items reporting 14 research studies and seven literature reviews met the inclusion criteria. The review shows that in health and care contexts, research into decisions of value in health and care is in its infancy and contains wide variation in approach and remit. The evidence is drawn from a range of service and country settings and this reduces generalisability or transferability of findings. An area of relative strength in the published evidence is inquiry into factors influencing coverage and commissioning decisions in health care systems. Allocative decisions have therefore been more consistently researched than technical decisions. We use Pettigrew’s (1985) distinction between inner and outer context to structure analysis of the range of factors reported as being influential. These include: evidence/information, organisational culture and governance regimes, and; economic and political conditions.   Conclusion Decisions of value in health and care are subject to range of intersecting influences that often lead to a departure from narrow notions of rational decision-making. Future research should pay greater attention to the relatively under-explored area of technical, as opposed to allocative, decision-making. UR - https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3470.html L1 - https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3470_230f9a22753fd44ae3e4f6fda1616bbc.pdf ER -