TY - JOUR ID - 4129 TI - Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015 JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management JA - IJHPM LA - en SN - AU - Mukuru, Moses AU - Gorry, Jonathan AU - Kiwanuka, Suzanne N. AU - Gibson, Linda AU - Musoke, David AU - Ssengooba, Freddie AD - Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda AD - School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK AD - Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda Y1 - 2022 PY - 2022 VL - 11 IS - 10 SP - 2124 EP - 2134 KW - Uganda KW - Maternal Mortality KW - Policy Mixes KW - Three Delay Model KW - Policy Design DO - 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.127 N2 - Background  Despite Uganda and other sub-Saharan African countries missing their maternal mortality ratio (MMR) targets for Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5, limited attention has been paid to policy design in the literature examining the persistence of preventable maternal mortality. This study examined the specific policy interventions designed to reduce maternal deaths in Uganda and identified particular policy design issues that underpinned MDG 5 performance. We suggest a novel prescriptive and analytical (re)conceptualization of policy in terms of its fidelity to ‘3Cs’ (coherence of design, comprehensiveness of coverage and consistency in application) that could have implications for future healthcare programming. Methods  We conducted a retrospective study. Sixteen Ugandan maternal health policy documents and 21 national programme performance reports were examined, and six key informant interviews conducted with national stakeholders managing maternal health programmes during the reference period 2000-2015. We applied the analytical framework of the ‘three delay model’ combined with a broader literature on ‘policy mixing.’ Results  Despite introducing fourteen separate policy instruments over 15 years with the goal of reducing maternal mortality, by the end of the MDG period in 2015, only 87.5% of the interventions for the three delays were covered with a notable lack of coherence and consistency evident among the instruments. The three delays persisted at the frontline with 70% of deaths by 2014 attributed to failures in referral policies while 67% of maternal deaths were due to inadequacies in healthcare facilities and trained personnel in the same period. By 2015, 37.3% of deaths were due to transportation issues. Conclusion  The piecemeal introduction of additional policy instruments frequently distorted existing synergies among policies resulting in persistence of the three delays and missed MDG 5 target. Future policy reforms should address the ‘three delays’ but also ensure fidelity of policy design to coherence, comprehensiveness and consistency. UR - https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4129.html L1 - https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4129_7078a6a36f67a96656f9869bfcab3097.pdf ER -