TY - JOUR ID - 4304 TI - Three Approaches to Improve a Practical Guide on Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design; Comment on “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide” JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management JA - IJHPM LA - en SN - AU - Guzman, Javier AD - Center for Global Development, Washington, DC, USA Y1 - 2023 PY - 2023 VL - 12 IS - Issue 1 SP - 1 EP - 3 KW - Health Technology Assessment KW - Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes KW - Legitimacy KW - Health Benefit Package DO - 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7502 N2 - As countries around the world seek to deliver universal health coverage, they must prioritize which services to pay for with public funds, to whom, and at what cost. Countries are increasingly using health technology assessment (HTA) to identify which interventions provide the best value for money and merit inclusion in their health benefit packages (HBPs)—the explicit lists of health services provided using public funds. Oortwijn et al understand the importance of providing practical guidance on the foundation of HBP design, and their article, “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide,” provides recommendations for HTA bodies to improve the legitimacy of their decision-making by incorporating four elements in their HBP procedures: stakeholder involvement, evidence-informed evaluation, transparency, and appeal. This article proposes three approaches to enhance the value of the guide: moving from structure to compliance and performance, prioritizing key issues of legitimacy within HBP processes, and acknowledging potential the costs and risks associated with the use of this framework. UR - https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4304.html L1 - https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4304_7a2d52522e92a8c0b08b749ae85aaa12.pdf ER -