<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Kerman University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Journal of Health Policy and Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-5939</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The No-Destination Ship of Priority-Setting in Healthcare: A Call for More Democracy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>345</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>348</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">3424</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.15171/ijhpm.2017.119</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Brayan</FirstName>
					<LastName>V. Seixas</LastName>
<Affiliation>School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;In dealing with scarcity of resources within healthcare systems, decision-makers inevitably have to make choices about which services to fund. Setting priorities represents a challenging task that requires systematic, explicit and transparent methodologies with focus on economic efficiency. In addition, the engagement of the general public in the process of decision-making has been regarded as one of the most important aspects of the management of publicly-funded health systems in liberal democracies. In the current essay, we aim to discuss the problematics of public engagement in the process of resource allocation and priority-setting within the context of publiclyfunded health systems. Our central argument is that although there may be a conflict between democratic mechanisms of citizen participation and economic efficiency, in the extra-welfarist sense, expected for/from the system, the solution for this tension does not seem to rely on more or novel authoritative technocratic approaches, but rather on the deepening and betterment of democratic participation.&lt;/span&gt;</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Healthcare Rationing</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Public Participation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Democracy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Organizational Decision-Making</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3424_b63bf42b9e6f568e87422a6831856b74.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
