<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Kerman University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Journal of Health Policy and Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-5939</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>8</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Policy, Theory, and Evaluation: Stop Mixing the Fruit Salad; Comment on “Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia”</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>763</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>765</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">3486</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.15171/ijhpm.2018.35</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Evelyne</FirstName>
					<LastName>De Leeuw</LastName>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation (CHETRE), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>South Western
Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>Ingham Institute, Liverpool, NSW, Australia</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>24</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;The study of Health in All Policies (HiAP) is gaining momentum. Authors are increasingly turning to wide swathes of political and social theory to frame (Program) Theory Based (or Informed) Evaluation (TBE) approaches. TBE for HiAP is not only prudent, it adds a level of elegance and insight to the research toolbox. However, it is still necessary to organize theoretical thinking appropriately. A commentary on a recent &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Int J Health Policy Manag &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;paper argued that the framing of context and causality were hard to establish. This paper argues that this is not the most pressing issue. Rather, it claims we need to go back to basics to establish an appropriate HiAP evaluation paradigm. Such a basic paradigm would hinge on an understanding of power.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Policy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Power</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Theory</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Evaluation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Joined-Up Government</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3486_428d440bb76677e54034da8c6afeeedc.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
