Kerman University of Medical Sciences International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2322-5939 10 6 2021 06 01 Reflections on Methodological Congruence in Systems and Complexity-Informed Research; Comment on “What Can Policy-Makers Get Out of Systems Thinking? Policy Partners’ Experiences of a Systems-Focused Research Collaboration in Preventive Health” 347 350 3971 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.231 EN Ana Teixeira De Melo Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Journal Article 2020 10 07 In this paper we argue, for an increased congruence between the conceptual frameworks and the research methodology in studies focused on the theory or practice of systems and complexity-informed thinking (SCT). In doing so, we believe we can build more complex forms of knowledge with clearer and more impactful implications for practice. There is scope for both methodological innovations and the adaptation of traditional research methods to enact properties congruent with the systemic complexity of our targeted realities. We organise our reflection around the paper of Haynes et al. We provide examples of how a research methodology more deeply embedded in systems and complexity-thinking may add depth and meaning to the research results and their interpretation. We explore the creative adaptation of the interview techniques to integrate systemic forms of questioning (eg, circular and reflexive questioning) to map the patterns of interaction contributing to the outcomes of interventions. https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3971_159d334d839fee4cb1cc993aeadcadf4.pdf