<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Kerman University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Journal of Health Policy and Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-5939</Issn>
				<Volume>12</Volume>
				<Issue>Issue 1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Bibliometrics, the “Clinical Diagnostics” of Research Impact; Comment on “‘We’re Not Providing the Best Care If We Are Not on the Cutting Edge of Research’: A Research Impact Evaluation at a Regional Australian Hospital and Health Service”</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>4</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4421</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7703</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Giovanni</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abramo</LastName>
<Affiliation>Laboratory for Studies in Research Evaluation, Institute for System Analysis
and Computer Science, National Research Council of Italy, Rome, Italy</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ciriaco Andrea</FirstName>
					<LastName>D’Angelo</LastName>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>Department of Engineering and Management, University of Rome “Tor
Vergata,” Rome, Italy</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>Laboratory for Studies in Research Evaluation, Institute for System Analysis
and Computer Science, National Research Council of Italy, Rome, Italy</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-6977-6611</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Following the Townsville Hospital and Health Service (THHS) strategic revision as a “research-based” institution, Brown et al have investigated the impact of THHS research, and its key drivers, based on 15 stakeholder interviews and two quantitative indicators. This commentary argues that the quantitative analyses and findings would have benefitted from applying evaluative bibliometrics, hopefully, conducted by experienced bibliometricians. We present the potential of bibliometrics for assessing the scholarly impact of research, as well as a few examples of its application to the case of THHS, for informing research policies and strategies.&lt;/span&gt;</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Evaluative Bibliometrics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Research Evaluation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Research Impact</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Research Management </Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4421_cc0fb497c4c9f484bc7d5432fd5c352e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
