<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Kerman University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Journal of Health Policy and Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-5939</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Well-Being Economics – From Slogan to Discipline?; Comment on “Can a Well-Being Economy Save Us?”</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>3</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4673</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34172/ijhpm.8871</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Martin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hensher</LastName>
<Affiliation>Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-6444-6827</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;This commentary addresses Ronald Labonté’s recent editorial, “can a well-being economy save us?” It considers how to assess whether well-being economy policy proposals are likely to achieve real change, or simply represent performative sloganeering. It considers Labonté’s discussion of the congruence between the well-being economy and widely held, cross-cultural values. Finally it explores the relationship between “well-being economics” and the key heterodox economic disciplines it has sprung from, especially ecological and feminist economics; and explores the relationship of well-being economics with degrowth and post-growth economics as policy goals and models, rather than disciplines. Ultimately, a well-being economy can only “save us” if it is fully guided by and constrained within the same hard ecological constraints that must also guide degrowth or post-growth policy prescriptions. &lt;/span&gt;</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Well-Being Economy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Degrowth</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Post-growth</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ecological Economics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Feminist Economics</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4673_cfd66e741860718ddecf1f6eabd05fc6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
