<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Kerman University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Journal of Health Policy and Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-5939</Issn>
				<Volume>14</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Critical Reflections on Public Health, Policy and Social Change Toward Healthy Societies; Comment on “How to Build Healthy Societies: A Thematic Analysis of Relevant Conceptual Frameworks”</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>3</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4748</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34172/ijhpm.9135</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Matthew</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fisher</LastName>
<Affiliation>Stretton Health Equity, Stretton Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Nambiar and colleagues in this journal identify the main conceptual frameworks offered by public health on &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle2&quot;&gt;how &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;to build healthy societies, drawn from key documents published over a span of 50 years. In their analysis they point to strengths and limitations of these frameworks and offer suggestions for their improvement. In this commentary, I argue that both the frameworks on offer and Nambiar and colleagues’ critique are missing important perspectives on well-being itself, on the role of the democratic State, and on the “community arena” and the “policy arena” as two related but distinct arenas for political and social change toward healthy societies.&lt;/span&gt; </Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Healthy Societies</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Public Well-being</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Public Policy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Health Promotion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Public Health Theory</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4748_38272a00021062eb8f17d17a5d332911.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
