<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Kerman University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>International Journal of Health Policy and Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-5939</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Applications of the Kirkpatrick Model in Post-secondary Health Sciences Education: A Scoping Review</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>14</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4853</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34172/ijhpm.8857</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Natasha L.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Gallant</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Regina, Regina, SK,
Canada</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-1915-2106</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Elizabeth</FirstName>
					<LastName>Oddone Paolucci</LastName>
<Affiliation>Departments of Community Health Sciences and Surgery, Cumming
School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-2446-5270</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Chelsea L.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Russill</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Regina, Regina, SK,
Canada</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ray</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jewett</LastName>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>Department of
Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>

						<AffiliationInfo>
						<Affiliation>Ontario
Health, Toronto, ON, Canada</Affiliation>
						</AffiliationInfo>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-8389-6767</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Chantelle</FirstName>
					<LastName>Recsky</LastName>
<Affiliation>School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Sciences,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-5570-1563</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Katherine</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ford</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Kinesiology
and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON,
Canada</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-8620-9360</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Dina</FirstName>
					<LastName>Idriss-Wheeler</LastName>
<Affiliation>Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences,
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1767-2471</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Victrine</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tseung</LastName>
<Affiliation>School of Rehabilitation Science,
Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hina</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ansari</LastName>
<Affiliation>MAP
Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s
Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zeenat</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ladak</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Applied Psychology &amp; Human
Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto,
Toronto, ON, Canada</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-8904-3186</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Aida</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fernandes</LastName>
<Affiliation>IMAGINE Network SPOR, McMaster University, Hamilton,
ON, Canada</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Deborah A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Marshall</LastName>
<Affiliation>Departments of Community Health Sciences and Medicine,
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-8467-8008</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		    <Abstract>Background  The Kirkpatrick model is commonly used as a systematic approach to evaluate training programs, although its application to health sciences experiential learning programs is not well-established. To inform the use of the Kirkpatrick model in the evaluation of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s (CIHR’s) Health System Impact Fellowship National Cohort Training Program (HSIF NCTP), we examined its application in post-secondary health sciences programs. Methods  Using the Joanna Briggs Institute’s updated methodology for scoping reviews, we searched CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies published from 2017 to 2023 that focused on health sciences experiential learning programs held at universities and reported on at least one level of the Kirkpatrick model (ie, reaction, learning, behavior, results). We extracted data on study characteristics and reported outcomes for each of the Kirkpatrick model levels. Results  After deduplication, we screened 755 titles and abstracts, we reviewed 97 full texts, and we included 34 studies in our scoping review. Many studies reported outcomes at the reaction or learning levels followed by the behaviour and results levels. Across levels, despite identifying several areas of improvement, learners typically reported favourable perceptions, increased confidence and knowledge, improved performance, and organizational improvements. Conclusion  The Kirkpatrick model is a widely used and highly adaptable evaluation model that has been successfully used to evaluate a range of post-secondary health sciences programs. Despite its wide use, evaluators using the Kirkpatrick model should use more robust methodologies to capture long-term behaviour and results associated with the programs. Future work should focus on evaluating a broader spectrum of programs such as doctoral- and postdoctoral-level experiential learning programs and underrepresented healthcare professions such as psychologists and dieticians. Integration of behaviour change and implementation science methodologies within the broader educational evaluation literature is also needed.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Education</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Evaluation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Experiential Learning</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Healthcare Professions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Health Systems</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Impact</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4853_812214fb8e7066bfa6e32c626c2c688b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
