Advancing Applications of System Dynamics in Critical Food Systems Research; Comment on “Using System Dynamics to Understand Transnational Corporate Power in Diet-Related Non-communicable Disease Prevention Policy-Making: A Case Study of South Africa”

Articles in Press

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

1 School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia

2 Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia

3 Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

4 Alfred Deakin Institute, Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia

Abstract

This commentary commends Milsom et al for their critical and rigorous application of qualitative system dynamics to unpack corporate power in food policy-making. Their use of Critical Realism, best practice qualitative methods, and feedback loops exemplifies the maturation of system dynamics applications in public health research. We reflect on how their work aligns with broader debates about power and social theory in system dynamics and how it offers a blueprint for trustworthiness and reflexivity in qualitative modelling. Drawing on our team’s work with Aboriginal communities in Australia, we highlight the value of culturally grounded, participatory modelling in amplifying the voices of communities experiencing historical and ongoing oppression. We support the authors’ call to advance toward simulation modelling and stress the importance of engaging with both system dynamics and communitybased knowledge to realise the transformative potential of systems-informed, community-led research in reshaping food policy and practice. 

Keywords

References

  1. Foster-Fishman PG, Nowell B, Yang H. Putting the system back into systems change: a framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39(3-4):197-215. doi:1007/s10464-007-9109-0
  2. Vandenbroeck P, Goossens J, Clemens M. Foresight, Tackling Obesities: Future Choices Building the Obesity System Map. London: Government Office for Science; 2007.
  3. Lane DC. Rerum cognoscere causas: part I—how do the ideas of system dynamics relate to traditional social theories and the voluntarism/determinism debate? Syst Dyn Rev. 2001;17(2):97-118. doi:1002/sdr.209
  4. Brown AD, Whelan J, Bolton KA, et al. A theory of change for community-based systems interventions to prevent obesity. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(5):786-794. doi:1016/j.amepre.2021.10.006
  5. Knai C, Petticrew M, Mays N, et al. Systems thinking as a framework for analyzing commercial determinants of health. Milbank Q. 2018;96(3):472-498. doi:1111/1468-0009.12339
  6. Gilmore AB, Fabbri A, Baum F, et al. Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health. Lancet. 2023;401(10383):1194-1213. doi:1016/s0140-6736(23)00013-2
  7. Milsom P, Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Smith R, Modisenyane SM, Walls H. Using system dynamics to understand transnational corporate power in diet-related non-communicable disease prevention policy-making: a case study of South Africa. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7641. doi:34172/ijhpm.2023.7641
  8. Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2008.
  9. Harris P. Illuminating Policy for Health: Insights from a Decade of Researching Urban and Regional Planning. Springer; 2022.
  10. Byrne D, Callaghan G. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art. Routledge; 2022.
  11. Carey G, Malbon E, Carey N, Joyce A, Crammond B, Carey A. Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009002. doi:1136/bmjopen-2015-009002
  12. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-357. doi:1093/intqhc/mzm042
  13. Braun V, Clarke V. How do you solve a problem like COREQ? A critique of consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Meth Psychol. 2024;11:100155. doi:1016/j.metip.2024.100155
  14. Browne J, Walker T, Hill K, et al. Food policies for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health (FoodPATH): a systems thinking approach. Food Policy. 2024;126:102676. doi:1016/j.foodpol.2024.102676
  15. Sherriff SL, Miller H, Tong A, et al. Building trust and sharing power for co-creation in Aboriginal health research: a stakeholder interview study. Evid Policy. 2019;15(3):371-392. doi:1332/174426419x15524681005401
  16. Yunkaporta T, Moodie D. Thought ritual: an Indigenous data analysis method for research. In: Indigenous Knowledges: Privileging Our Voices. Brill Sense; 2021:87-96.
  17. Glassey R, Tipene-Leach D, Rees D, Swinburn B. Food systems, indigenous knowledge and systems thinking: a case study in regional New Zealand. Community Health Equity Res Policy. 2025:2752535x251324808. doi:1177/2752535x251324808
International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 03 June 2025

Files

History

  • Received Date: 01 April 2025
  • Revised Date: 30 May 2025
  • Accepted Date: 01 June 2025
  • First Published Date: 03 June 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics