Medication Dispensing Patterns Following Teleconsultations in France From January 2021 to June 2023: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the National Health Data System

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France

2 Collège universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France

3 Service Pharmacie, Hôpital des Charpennes, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France

4 Pôle Territorial Santé Publique, Hôpitaux Champagne Sud, Troyes, France

5 Faculté de Médecine, Université de Reims Champagne Ardennes, Reims, France

6 Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université Paris Cite and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Paris, France

7 Department of General Practice, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

8 Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service des Données de Santé, Lyon, France

Abstract

Background 
Teleconsultation services grew significantly in France during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reimbursed teleconsultations increased by a hundredfold between 2019 and 2021, establishing it as an emerging healthcare delivery modality. However, medication dispensing patterns following teleconsultations remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to characterize post-teleconsultation medication dispensing patterns between 2021 and 2023.
 
Methods 
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the French health database. The study included all teleconsultations conducted that resulted in at least one medication dispensing event (TLCs) between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023. We described patient demographics, prescriber characteristics, and dispensed medication.
 
Results 
During the study period, 11 202 364 TLCs (34.3%) out of 33 853 911 resulted in medication dispensing. Among these 11 202 364 TLCs, the patient population predominantly comprised females (64.4%), individuals without long-term medical conditions (86.4%), with a mean age of 42.2 years (SD ± 20.8). Teleconsultations were mainly conducted by liberals’ physicians (86.8%) and health centre-employed practitioners (12.1%). The use of teleconsultation platforms increased fivefold between the first semesters 2021 (4.2%) and 2023 (28.2%). Teleconsultations resulted in medications targeting the nervous system (53.1%), digestive system (28.3%), and respiratory system (21.8%). Two contexts of dispensing emerged: dispensing with chronic indication (42.8% of TLCs) characterized by a long median time and several dispensing, and dispensing with an acute indication (55.6%), characterized by single dispensing with a 0-1 day between teleconsultation and dispensing.
 
Conclusion 
One third of the teleconsultations resulted in medication dispensing, mainly for young, urban patients with good access to care, in contrast to the objective as described in the French Law. Dispensing patterns revealed two distinct modalities, acute symptomatic and chronic disease management. Certain classes of drugs dispensed (antibiotics, opioids, benzodiazepines) may raise questions about appropriate dispensing practices in teleconsultations.

Keywords


  1. Health informatics and telemedicine; 1997. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/b6b23055-48d8-47d3-9dca-60f0f5c378eb/content. Accessed April 4, 2026.
  2. Murphy RL, Bird KT. Telediagnosis: a new community health resource. Observations on the feasibility of telediagnosis based on 1000 patient transactions. Am J Public Health. 1974;64(2):113-119. doi:2105/AJPH.64.2.113
  3. House AM, Roberts JM. Telemedicine in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 1977;117(4):386-388.
  4. Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé. Section 1: Définition Des Actes de Télémédecine (Article R6316-1); 2021. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGISCTA000043600560/2021-06-05
  5. Ministère des solidarités et de la Santé. Arrêté Du 1er Août 2018 Portant Approbation de l’avenant N° 6 à La Convention Nationale Organisant Les Rapports Entre Les Médecins Libéraux et l’assurance Maladie Signée Le 25 Août 2016; 2018. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000037306389
  6. Carrillo de Albornoz S, Sia K-L, Harris A. The effectiveness of teleconsultations in primary care: systematic review. Fam Pract. 2022;39(1):168-182. doi:1093/fampra/cmab077
  7. Vodička S, Zelko E. Remote Consultations in General Practice - A Systematic Review. Zdr Varst. 2022;61(4):224-230. doi:2478/sjph-2022-0030
  8. Kamionka J, Bergeat M. Sept téléconsultations de médecine générale sur dix concernent des patients des grands pôles urbains en 2021. Études et Résultats. December 2022. https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2022-12/ER1249.pdf/.
  9. Saint-Lary O, Gautier S, Breton JL, et al. How GPs adapted their practices and organisations at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: a French national observational survey. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e042119. doi:1136/bmjopen-2020-042119
  10. Davin-Casalena B, Jardin M, Guerrera H, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on primary care in South-eastern France: implementation of a real-time monitoring system based on regional health insurance system data. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2021;69(5):255-264. doi:1016/j.respe.2021.07.006
  11. Jaury P, Larangot-Rouffet C, Gay B, Gonthier R, Ourabah R, Queneau P. Rapport 21-08. La téléconsultation en médecine générale : une transformation en profondeur dans la façon de soigner. Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine. 2021;205(8):852-856. doi:1016/j.banm.2021.07.008
  12. Lim EC, Chen CYT, Tan EK. Remote prescription during pandemic: challenges and solutions. Arch Med Res. 2021;52(4):450-452. doi:1016/j.arcmed.2020.12.007
  13. Han SM, Greenfield G, Majeed A, Hayhoe B. Impact of remote consultations on antibiotic prescribing in primary health care: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e23482. doi:2196/23482
  14. Sundseth AC, Gjelstad S, Straand J, Rosvold EO. General practitioners’ prescriptions of benzodiazepines, Z-hypnotics and opioid analgesics for elderly patients during direct and indirect contacts. A cross-sectional, observational study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018;36(2):115-122. doi:1080/02813432.2018.1459164
  15. Morin KA, Parrotta MD, Eibl JK, Marsh DC. A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing In-Person and Telemedicine-Based Opioid Agonist Treatment in Ontario, Canada, Using Administrative Health Data. Eur Addict Res. 2021;27(4):268-276. doi:1159/000513471
  16. Martinez KA, Rood M, Jhangiani N, et al. Patterns of use and correlates of patient satisfaction with a large nationwide direct to consumer telemedicine service. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(10):1768-1773. doi:1007/s11606-018-4621-5
  17. Ahmed A, Mutahar M, Daghrery AA, et al. A Systematic Review of Publications on Perceptions and Management of Chronic Medical Conditions Using Telemedicine Remote Consultations by Primary Healthcare Professionals April 2020 to December 2021 During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Med Sci Monit. 2024;30:e943383. doi:12659/MSM.943383
  18. Totten AM, Hansen RN, Wagner J, et al. Telehealth for Acute and Chronic Care Consultations. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2019. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547239/. Accessed December 4, 2024.
  19. The General Medical Council. Remote prescribing high level principles. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/learning-materials/remote-prescribing-high-level-principles. Accessed November 29, 2023.
  20. Langan SM, Schmidt SA, Wing K, et al. The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE). BMJ. 2018;363:k3532. doi:1136/bmj.k3532
  21. Tuppin P, Rudant J, Constantinou P, et al. Value of a national administrative database to guide public decisions: From the système national d’information interrégimes de l’Assurance Maladie (SNIIRAM) to the système national des données de santé (SNDS) in France. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017;65 Suppl 4:S149-S167. doi:1016/j.respe.2017.05.004
  22. La grille communale de densité. Insee website. https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/6439600. Accessed April 16, 2025.
  23. Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques. L’indicateur d’accessibilité potentielle localisée (APL). https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/sources-outils-et-enquetes/lindicateur-daccessibilite-potentielle-localisee-apl. Accessed October 7, 2024.
  24. Lucas-Gabrielli V, Mangeney C. How can accessibility measures be improved to better target underserved areas? Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2019;67:S25-S32. doi:1016/j.respe.2018.12.061
  25. Sante Publique France. Mesure des inégalités de mortalité par cause de décès. Approche écologique à l’aide d’un indice de désavantage social. 2011. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/notices/mesure-des-inegalites-de-mortalite-par-cause-de-deces.-approche-ecologique-a-l-aide-d-un-indice-de-desavantage-social.-numero-thematique.-inegalite. Accessed October 7, 2024.
  26. DGOS, Ministère de la santé et de l’accès aux soins. Un agrément pour les sociétés de téléconsultation. https://sante.gouv.fr/soins-et-maladies/prises-en-charge-specialisees/telesante-pour-l-acces-de-tous-a-des-soins-a-distance/la-teleconsultation-11362/article/un-agrement-pour-les-societes-de-teleconsultation. Accessed November 12, 2024.
  27. World Health Organization. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification. https://www.who.int/tools/atc-ddd-toolkit/atc-classification. Accessed October 7, 2024.
  28. Les populations de référence des communes au 1er janvier 2022 - Insee Focus - 346. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/8309996. Accessed April 16, 2025.
  29. LOI N° 2009-879 Du 21 Juillet 2009 Portant Réforme de l’hôpital et Relative Aux Patients, à La Santé et Aux Territoires; 2009. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000020879475. Accessed July 23, 2023.
  30. Open Damir: base complète sur les dépenses d’assurance maladie - 2009 à 2023 | L’Assurance Maladie. https://www.assurance-maladie.ameli.fr/etudes-et-donnees/open-damir-depenses-sante-interregimes. Published April 19, 2024. Accessed November 20, 2024.
  31. Diniz CS, Coelho LR, de Almeida SR, et al. Understanding the personal barriers of elderly patients for carrying out teleconsultations during COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study. Telemed J E Health. 2024;30(11):2712-2720. doi:1089/tmj.2023.0544
  32. Cimperman M, Brenčič MM, Trkman P, Stanonik M de L. Older adults’ perceptions of home telehealth services. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(10):786-790. doi:1089/tmj.2012.0272
  33. Lam K, Lu AD, Shi Y, Covinsky KE. Assessing telemedicine unreadiness among older adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 ;180(10):1389-1391. doi:1001/jamainternmed.2020.2671
  34. Johns G, Burhouse A, Tan J, et al. Remote mental health services: a mixed-methods survey and interview study on the use, value, benefits and challenges of a national video consulting service in NHS Wales, UK. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e053014. doi:1136/bmjopen-2021-053014
  35. Cowan KE, McKean AJ, Gentry MT, Hilty DM. Barriers to Use of Telepsychiatry: Clinicians as Gatekeepers. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2019;94(12):2510-2523. doi:1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018
  • Received Date: 15 May 2025
  • Revised Date: 27 January 2026
  • Accepted Date: 22 May 2026
  • First Published Date: 23 May 2026
  • Published Date: 01 December 2026