Embedded Research Fellows: Charting New Paths for Impact; Comment on “Early Career Outcomes of Embedded Research Fellows: An Analysis of the Health System Impact Fellowship Program”

Articles in Press

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

With more PhDs working outside of academia, embedded research programs are emerging as one way to broaden the skills of students and bridge the gap between theory and practice. Limited data has been collected on the impact of these programs. The paper by Kasaai et al provides a glimpse into the early career paths of alumni from Canadian Institutes of Health Research’s (CIHR’s) Health Systems Impact (HSI) Fellowship. The results suggest demand for embedded researchers is high and their career prospects are promising. Beyond that, the paper raises several issues that warrant further attention. First is the evolution towards learning health systems (LHSs) and the role embedded researchers might play in this. Second is the potential of embedded researchers to span the worlds of academia and practice. Third is how to measure impact in non-academic research roles. This commentary explores these issues and suggests ways that embedded researcher programs can contribute to each.

Keywords

References

  1. Kasaai B, Thompson E, Glazier RH, McMahon M. Early career outcomes of embedded research fellows: an analysis of the health system impact fellowship program. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7333. doi:34172/ijhpm.2023.7333
  2. Institute of Medicine. Best care at lower cost: The path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.
  3. Lavis JN, Gauvin F-P, Mattison CA, et al. Rapid synthesis: Creating rapid learning health systems in Canada. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum; 2018.
  4. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Waye Perry B. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Q. 2007;85(4):729-768. doi:1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x
  5. Bornstein S, Heritage M, Chudak A, Tamblyn R, McMahon M, Brown AD. Development of Enriched Core Competencies for Health Services and Policy Research. Health Serv Res. 2018;53 Suppl 2:4004-4023. doi:1111/1475-6773.12847
  6. Pan-Canadian Training Modernization Task Force. Enriched (Refreshed) Core Competency Framework for Health Systems and Policy Research. Toronto (ON); 2024.
  7. Vindrola-Padros C, Pape T, Utley M, Fulop NJ. The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(1):70-80. doi:1136/bmjqs-2015-004877
  8. Greenhalgh T, Raftery J, Hanney S, et al. Research impact: a narrative review. BMC Med. 2016;14:78. doi:1186/s12916-016-0620-8
  9. Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS). Making an impact: A preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research. Report of the Panel on the Return on Investments in Health Research. January 2009. http://www.cahs-acss.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ROI_ FullReport.pdf
  10. Canadian Health Services and Policy Research Alliance (CHSPRA), Impact Analysis Working Group. Making an impact: A shared framework for assessing the impact of health services and policy research on decision-making. Ottawa (ON): CHSPRA; 2018. 
International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 30 September 2025

Files

History

  • Received Date: 07 February 2025
  • Revised Date: 28 July 2025
  • Accepted Date: 28 July 2025
  • First Published Date: 29 July 2025
  • Published Date: 30 September 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics