Economic Evaluation of Multilayer Silicone-Adhesive Polyurethane Foam Dressing for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in At-Risk Hospitalized Patients: US and Italian Perspective

Mezzalira, Elisabetta; Ambrosi, Elisa; Askew, Neil; Nherera, Leo; Searle, Richard; Fatoye, Francis; Forni, Cristiana

doi:10.34172/ijhpm.8371

Economic Evaluation of Multilayer Silicone-Adhesive Polyurethane Foam Dressing for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in At-Risk Hospitalized Patients: US and Italian Perspective

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Elisabetta Mezzalira ¹

Elisa Ambrosi ¹

Neil Askew ²

Leo Nherera ²

Richard Searle ²

Francis Fatoye ³

Cristiana Forni ⁴

¹ Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

² Smith and Nephew, Fort Worth, TX, USA

³ Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

⁴ IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

10.34172/ijhpm.8371

Abstract

Background
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) constitute an important source of concern for healthcare systems due to their negative consequences on patient quality of life and hospital costs. This phenomenon is increasing worldwide, driven by an aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic conditions. This economic evaluation aimed to determine whether using a multilayer, silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing shaped for the sacrum area, alongside standard prevention (SP), is cost-effective in preventing HAPUs for hospitalized patients compared to SP alone.

Methods
We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the expected costs and clinical benefits of using the polyurethane foam dressing from Italian and US payor perspectives. Model inputs were taken from published studies, and uncertainty was assessed using one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA).

Results
From both US and Italian perspectives, using a foam dressing in addition to SP was found to be cost-saving in all hospital settings. That is, it reduced the incidence of HAPUs at a lower cost overall. The estimated savings were €179 per patient and $305 per patient from Italian and US perspectives. Following sensitivity analysis, the results remained cost-saving, suggesting that our findings are robust.

Conclusion
This is the first economic analysis investigating the cost-effectiveness of preventive dressings and SP for avoiding sacral pressure ulcers for at-risk hospitalized patients. This analysis suggests that using a multilayer polyurethane foam dressing to prevent sacral HAPUs in at-risk hospitalized patients is a cost-effective strategy compared with SP alone and, therefore, should be considered as a strategy for PU prevention in hospital settings.

Keywords

Cost-Effectiveness

Economic Evaluation

Pressure Ulcer

Pressure Injury

Prevention

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: clinical practice guideline. In: Haesler E, ed. The International Guideline. EPUAP, NPIAP, PPPIA; 2019.
Moore Z, Patton D, Avsar P, et al. Prevention of pressure ulcers among individuals cared for in the prone position: lessons for the COVID-19 emergency. J Wound Care. 2020;29(6):312-320. doi:12968/jowc.2020.29.6.312
Moore ZE, Patton D. Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):CD006471. doi:1002/14651858.CD006471.pub4
Zhang X, Zhu N, Li Z, Xie X, Liu T, Ouyang G. The global burden of decubitus ulcers from 1990 to 2019. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21750. doi:1038/s41598-021-01188-4
Roussou E, Fasoi G, Stavropoulou A, et al. Quality of life of patients with pressure ulcers: a systematic review. Med Pharm Rep. 2023;96(2):123-130. doi:15386/mpr-2531
Padula WV, Delarmente BA. The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States. Int Wound J. 2019;16(3):634-640. doi:1111/iwj.13071
Wassel CL, Delhougne G, Gayle JA, Dreyfus J, Larson B. Risk of readmissions, mortality, and hospital-acquired conditions across hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) stages in a US National Hospital Discharge database. Int Wound J. 2020;17(6):1924-1934. doi:1111/iwj.13482
Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P, Vowden KR. Cohort study evaluating pressure ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK following initial presentation in the community: costs and outcomes. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e021769. doi:1136/bmjopen-2018-021769
Forni C, Searle R. A multilayer polyurethane foam dressing for pressure ulcer prevention in older hip fracture patients: an economic evaluation. J Wound Care. 2020;29(2):120-127. doi:12968/jowc.2020.29.2.120
Demarré L, Van Lancker A, Van Hecke A, et al. The cost of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(11):1754-1774. doi:1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.06.006
Forni C, D'Alessandro F, Gallerani P, et al. Effectiveness of using a new polyurethane foam multi-layer dressing in the sacral area to prevent the onset of pressure ulcer in the elderly with hip fractures: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J. 2018;15(3):383-390. doi:1111/iwj.12875
Chiari P, Forni C, Guberti M, Gazineo D, Ronzoni S, D'Alessandro F. Predictive factors for pressure ulcers in an older adult population hospitalized for hip fractures: a prognostic cohort study. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169909. doi:1371/journal.pone.0169909
Santamaria N, Gerdtz M, Sage S, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial. Int Wound J. 2015;12(3):302-308. doi:1111/iwj.12101
Forni C, Gazineo D, Allegrini E, et al. Effectiveness of a multi-layer silicone-adhesive polyurethane foam dressing as prevention for sacral pressure ulcers in at-risk in-patients: randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;127:104172. doi:1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104172
Hahnel E, El Genedy M, Tomova-Simitchieva T, et al. The effectiveness of two silicone dressings for sacral and heel pressure ulcer prevention compared with no dressings in high-risk intensive care unit patients: a randomized controlled parallel-group trial. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):256-264. doi:1111/bjd.18621
Beeckman D, Fourie A, Raepsaet C, et al. Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings as adjuvant prophylactic therapy to prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a pragmatic noncommercial multicentre randomized open-label parallel-group medical device trial. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(1):52-61. doi:1111/bjd.19689
Posnett J, Gottrup F, Lundgren H, Saal G. The resource impact of wounds on health-care providers in Europe. J Wound Care. 2009;18(4):154-161. doi:12968/jowc.2009.18.4.41607
ISTAT Database. Available at: http://dati.istat.it/. Accessed June 14, 2023.
S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUUR0000SAM. Accessed June 14, 2023.
Zurynski Y, Herkes-Deane J, Holt J, et al. How can the healthcare system deliver sustainable performance? A scoping review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e059207. doi:1136/bmjopen-2021-059207
Coiera E, Hovenga EJ. Building a sustainable health system. Yearb Med Inform. 2007;16(1):11-18.
El Genedy M, Hahnel E, Tomova-Simitchieva T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of multi-layered silicone foam dressings for prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in high-risk intensive care unit patients: An economic analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J. 2020;17(5):1291-1299. doi:1111/iwj.13390
Oe M, Sasaki S, Shimura T, Takaki Y, Sanada H. Effects of multilayer silicone foam dressings for the prevention of pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2020;9(12):649-656. doi:1089/wound.2019.1002
Rahman-Synthia SS, Kumar S, Boparai S, Gupta S, Mohtashim A, Ali D. Prophylactic use of silicone dressing to minimize pressure injuries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2023;33(1):4-13. doi:1016/j.enfcle.2022.05.002