Inequities in the Freedom to Lead a Flourishing and Healthy Life: Issues for Healthy Public Policy

Document Type : Editorial

Author

Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Abstract

There are many reasons for the health inequities that we see around the world today. Public policy and the way society organises its affairs affects the economic, social and physical factors that influence the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age - the social determinants of health. Tackling health inequities is a political issue that requires leadership, political courage, progressive public policy, social struggle and action, and a sound evidence base.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1.  

    1. AP-HealthGAEN. An Asia Pacific spotlight on health inequity: Taking Action to Address the Social and Environmental Determinants of Health Inequity in Asia Pacific, 2011. Canberra: Global Action for Health Equity Network (HealthGAEN); 2011.
    2. Leigh A. Battlers & Billionaires: the Story of Inequality in Australia. Collingwood: Redback; 2013.
    3. Murray CJL, Kulkarni SC, Michaud C, Tomijima N, Bulzacchelli MT, Iandiorio TJ, et al. Eight Americas: Investigating Mortality Disparities across Races, Counties, and Race-Counties in the United States. PLoS Med 2006; 3: e260.  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030260
    4. Yach D, Leeder SR, Bell J, Kistnasamy B. Global Chronic Diseases. Science 2005; 307: 317.  doi: 10.1126/science.307.5708.317
    5. Schmidhuber J, Shetty P. The nutrition transition to 2030. Why developing countries are likely to bear the major burden. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C-Economy 2005; 2: 150-66.  doi: 10.1080/16507540500534812
    6. Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet 1991; 337: 1387-93. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-k 
    7. Gupta R. Smoking, educational status and health inequity in India. Indian J Med Res 2006; 124: 15-22
    8. Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH). Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
    9. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet 2008; 372: 1661-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61690-6
    10. World Health Organisation (WHO). The World Health Report 2010 - Health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
    11. Tudor-Hart J. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971; 1: 405-12. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x
    12. Kemp A, Preen D, Glover J, Semmens J, Roughead E. Impact of cost of medicines for chronic conditions on low income households in Australia. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013; 18: 21-7.  doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011184
    13. McIntyre D, Garshong B, Mtei G, Meheus F, Thiede M, Akazili J, et al. Beyond fragmentation and towards universal coverage: insights from Ghana, South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania. Bull World Health Organ 2008; 86: 871-6. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.053413  
    14. Victora C, Matijasevich A, Silveira M, Santos I, Barros A, Barros F. Socio-economic and ethnic group inequities in antenatal care quality in the public and private sector in Brazil. Health Policy Plan 2010; 25: 253-61.  doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp065
    15. Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet 2007; 369: 60-70.  doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60032-4
    16. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). PISA 2012 Results: Excellence Through Equity: Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed (Volume II). Paris: OECD Publishing; 2013.
    17. Joan B, Carles M, Haejoo C, Orielle S, Vilma S, Sharon F, et al. The importance of government policies in reducing employment related health inequalities. BMJ 2010; 340.  doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2154
    18. Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU). The report of the Independent Inquiry into Insecure Work in Australia. Canberra: ACTU; 2012.
    19. Benach J, Muntaner C. Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61: 276-7.  doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.045237
    20. Broom D, D’Souza RM, Strazdins L, Butterworth P, Parslow R, Rodgers B. The lesser evil: Bad jobs or unemployment? A survey of mid-aged Australians. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63: 575-86. 
    21. Stuckler D, Basu S. The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills. London: Penguin; 2013.
    22. Major Cities Unit. State of Australian Cities 2013. Canberra: Department of Infrastructure and Transport; 2013.
    23. Giles-Corti B, Bull F, Knuiman M, McCormack G, Van Niel K, Timperio A, et al. The influence of urban design on neighbourhood walking following residential relocation: Longitudinal results from the RESIDE study. Soc Sci Med 2013; 77: 20-30.  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.016
    24. Smit W, Hancock T, Kumaresen J, Santos-Burgoa C, Sánchez-Kobashi Meneses R, Friel S. Toward a Research and Action Agenda on Urban Planning/Design and Health Equity in Cities in Low and Middle-Income Countries. J Urban Health 2011; 88: 875-85.  doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9605-2
    25. Social Exclusion Knowledge Network (SEKN). Understanding and tackling social exclusion. Final Report of the Social Exclusion Knowledge Network of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
    26. Blacksher E, Lovasi G. Place-focused physical activity research, human agency, and social justice in public health: Taking agency seriously in studies of the built environment. Health Place 2012; 18: 172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.019 
    27. Bartels L. Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2009.
    28. Schafer A. Consequences of social inequality for democracy in Western Europe. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 2012; 6: 23-45.  doi: 10.1007/s12286-010-0086-6