International Journal of Health Policy and Management

International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Impact of the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Payment Reform on Provider Behavior in China: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Ruixin Wang 1
Jiaqi Yan 1
Xinyu Zhang 1
Mengcen Qian 1
Xiaohua Ying 1, 2
1 School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
2 Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment (Fudan University), Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
10.34172/ijhpm.8463
Abstract
Background 
China has developed a novel case-based payment method called the diagnosis-intervention packet (DIP) to regulate healthcare providers’ behavior. G city, a metropolis in southeast China, has shifted its payment policy from fixed rate per admission to DIP under regional global budget since 2018. This study examined the immediate and trend changes in provider behavior after this payment reform.
 
Methods 
Discharge data in G city between 2016 and 2019 was used, covering more than 10 million inpatient cases in 320 hospitals. A counterfactual scenario was developed to assign insured and uninsured inpatients across the study period to specific DIP groups under consistent rules. Controlled interrupted time series (ITS) analyses were performed, with uninsured inpatients as control. Outcomes included inpatient volume, average DIP weight (similar to case-mix index [CMI] in diagnosis-related groups [DRGs]), and two innovative indicators (average diagnostic weight and average treatment weight) to decompose the changes in DIP weight. Subgroup analyses were conducted for different hospital levels and 21 major disease categories.
 
Results 
After the DIP reform, monthly trend of inpatient volume decreased (-1085.34, P = .052), while monthly growth of average DIP weight increased (2.17, P = .02). No significant changes in average diagnostic weight were observed. Monthly trend of average treatment weight increased (2.38, P = .001) after the reform. Secondary and tertiary hospitals experienced insignificantly decreased inpatient volume and elevated average DIP weight, accompanied by negligible change in average diagnostic weight and significant increase in average treatment weight. Primary hospitals experienced reduced inpatient volume and stable average DIP weight, along with increase in average diagnostic weight and decrease in average treatment weight.
 
Conclusion 
By differentiated payments for severity, DIP induced hospitals to shift their focus from volume to weight of inpatients. Instead of diagnostic upcoding, hospitals responded to the DIP reform primarily by increasing treatment intensity. Primary hospitals may face financial risks under regional competition. 
Keywords
Diagnosis-Intervention Packet
Payment Reform
Provider Behavior
Interrupted Time Series
China
  1. National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook of the Tertiary Industry. Beijing, CN: China Statistics Press; 2022.
  2. Ellis RP, McGuire TG. Provider behavior under prospective reimbursement. Cost sharing and supply. J Health Econ. 1986;5(2):129-151. doi:1016/0167-6296(86)90002-0
  3. The People’s Government of Guangzhou Municipality. Statistical Bulletin of Guangzhou National Economic and Social Development in 2022 [Internet]. 2023. https://www.gz.gov.cn/zwgk/sjfb/tjgb/content/post_8922708.html. Accessed December 2, 2023.
  4. Xie H, Cui X, Ying X, Hu X, Xuan J, Xu S. Development of a novel hospital payment system - big data diagnosis & intervention packet. Health Policy Open. 2022;3:100066. doi:1016/j.hpopen.2022.100066
  5. Xu S, Xie H, Cui X, et al. Principle and method of the big data diagnosis-intervention packet (DIP) payment system. China Health Insurance. 2020(9):23-28. doi:19546/j.issn.1674-3830.2020.9.007
  6. Goldfarb MG, Coffey RM. Change in the Medicare case-mix index in the 1980s and the effect of the prospective payment system. Health Serv Res. 1992;27(3):385-415.
  7. Busse R, Geissler A, Aaviksoo A, et al. Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals? BMJ. 2013;346:f3197. doi:1136/bmj.f3197
  8. Lai Y, Fu H, Li L, Yip W. Hospital response to a case-based payment scheme under regional global budget: The case of Guangzhou in China. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114601. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2021.114601
  9. Al-Khalil O, Valeri F, Senn O, Rosemann T, Di Gangi S. Effects of a DRG-based hospital reimbursement on the health care utilization and costs in Swiss primary care: a retrospective "quasi-experimental" analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0241179. doi:1371/journal.pone.0241179
  10. Lin K, Yao Y, Xiong Y, Xiang L. The effect of an innovative payment method on inpatient volume and bed resources and their regional distribution: the case of a central province in China. Int J Equity Health. 2024;23(1):159. doi:1186/s12939-024-02243-y
  11. Davis C, Rhodes DJ. The impact of DRGs on the cost and quality of health care in the United States. Health Policy. 1988;9(2):117-131. doi:1016/0168-8510(88)90029-2
  12. Hong D, Lv D, Wu J, et al. The Influence of diagnosis intervention packet policy intervention on medication structure and drug cost of elderly hypertensive inpatients in China: a multicenter interrupted time-series analysis. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023;16:1781-1790. doi:2147/rmhp.s418541
  13. Lin K, Li Y, Yao Y, Xiong Y, Xiang L. The impact of an innovative payment method on medical expenditure, efficiency, and quality for inpatients with different types of medical insurance: evidence from a pilot city, China. Int J Equity Health. 2024;23(1):115. doi:1186/s12939-024-02196-2
  14. Zhang Y, Xu SY, Tan GM. Unraveling the effects of DIP payment reform on inpatient healthcare: insights into impacts and challenges. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):887. doi:1186/s12913-024-11363-8
  15. Tang X, Zhang X, Chen Y, Yan J, Qian M, Ying X. Variations in the impact of the new case-based payment reform on medical costs, length of stay, and quality across different hospitals in China: an interrupted time series analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):568. doi:1186/s12913-023-09553-x
  16. Chen YJ, Zhang XY, Tang X, Yan JQ, Qian MC, Ying XH. How do inpatients' costs, length of stay, and quality of care vary across age groups after a new case-based payment reform in China? An interrupted time series analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):160. doi:1186/s12913-023-09109-z
  17. Ding Y, Yin J, Zheng C, Dixon S, Sun Q. The impacts of diagnosis-intervention packet payment on the providers' behavior of inpatient care-evidence from a national pilot city in China. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1069131. doi:3389/fpubh.2023.1069131
  18. Zhang X, Tang S, Wang R, Qian M, Ying X, Maciejewski ML. Hospital response to a new case-based payment system in China: the patient selection effect. Health Policy Plan. 2024;39(5):519-527. doi:1093/heapol/czae022
  19. Dafny LS. How do hospitals respond to price changes? Am Econ Rev. 2005;95(5):1525-1547. doi:1257/000282805775014236
  20. Carter GM, Newhouse JP, Relles DA. How much change in the case mix index is DRG creep? J Health Econ. 1990;9(4):411-428. doi:1016/0167-6296(90)90003-l
  21. Shigeoka H, Fushimi K. Supplier-induced demand for newborn treatment: evidence from Japan. J Health Econ. 2014;35:162-178. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2014.03.003
  22. Hochuli P. Losing body weight for money: how provider-side financial incentives cause weight loss in Swiss low-birth-weight newborns. Health Econ. 2020;29(4):406-418. doi:1002/hec.3991
  23. Jürges H, Köberlein J. What explains DRG upcoding in neonatology? The roles of financial incentives and infant health. J Health Econ. 2015;43:13-26. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2015.06.001
  24. Williamson HA Jr, Hart LG, Pirani MJ, Rosenblatt RA. Rural hospital inpatient surgical volume: cutting-edge service or operating on the margin? J Rural Health. 1994;10(1):16-25. doi:1111/j.1748-0361.1994.tb00204.x
  25. Joya RM, Cottrell L, Kiefer A, Polak MJ. Diagnosis-related group weight and derived case mix index to assess the complexity among twins. Am J Perinatol. 2022;39(11):1223-1228. doi:1055/s-0040-1721847
  26. Linden A. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single-and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J. 2015;15(2):480-500. doi:1177/1536867x1501500208
  27. Kutz A, Gut L, Ebrahimi F, Wagner U, Schuetz P, Mueller B. Association of the Swiss diagnosis-related group reimbursement system with length of stay, mortality, and readmission rates in hospitalized adult patients. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(2):e188332. doi:1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.8332
  28. Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS, et al. Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(3):CD002215. doi:1002/14651858.cd002215
  29. Shi H, Cheng Z, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang P. Does a new case-based payment system promote the construction of the ordered health delivery system? Evidence from a pilot city in China. Int J Equity Health. 2024;23(1):55. doi:1186/s12939-024-02146-y
  30. Qian M, Zhang X, Chen Y, Xu S, Ying X. The pilot of a new patient classification-based payment system in China: the impact on costs, length of stay and quality. Soc Sci Med. 2021;289:114415. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2021.114415
  31. Yang H, Huang X, Zhou Z, et al. Determinants of initial utilization of community healthcare services among patients with major non-communicable chronic diseases in South China. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116051. doi:1371/journal.pone.0116051
  32. Duckett J, Hunt K, Munro N, Sutton M. Does distrust in providers affect health-care utilization in China? Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(8):1001-1009. doi:1093/heapol/czw024
  33. Wu D, Wang Y, Lam KF, Hesketh T. Health system reforms, violence against doctors and job satisfaction in the medical profession: a cross-sectional survey in Zhejiang province, eastern China. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e006431. doi:1136/bmjopen-2014-006431
  34. Liu Y, Kong Q, Yuan S, van de Klundert J. Factors influencing choice of health system access level in China: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201887. doi:1371/journal.pone.0201887
  35. Zhang A, Nikoloski Z, Albala SA, Yip W, Xu J, Mossialos E. Patient choice of health care providers in China: primary care facilities versus hospitals. Health Syst Reform. 2020;6(1):e1846844. doi:1080/23288604.2020.1846844
  36. Hu XJ, Wang HHX, Li YT, et al. Healthcare needs, experiences and treatment burden in primary care patients with multimorbidity: an evaluation of process of care from patients' perspectives. Health Expect. 2022;25(1):203-213. doi:1111/hex.13363
  37. Ginsburg PB, Carter GM. Medicare case-mix index increase. Health Care Financ Rev. 1986;7(4):51-65.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 13, Issue 1
2024
Pages 1-10

XML
PDF 1.39 M
Supplementary File
(IJHPM does not take responsibility for any information provided in the supplementary files.)
Wang-Supple-File-1-IJHPM.pdf

  • Received Date 18 February 2024
  • Revised Date 16 October 2024
  • Accepted Date 19 November 2024
  • First Published Date 20 November 2024
  • Published Date 01 December 2024