Commercial Determinants Drive Political Determinants of Health in a Neoliberal Society; Comment on “Energy as a Social and Commercial Determinant of Health: A Qualitative Study of Australian Policy”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Energy policies have a major impact on the health and well-being of the population. However, Australia’s energy policies rarely consider health and well-being in their policies. In Australia and in many other countries, energy policies, while developed by governments, are heavily influenced by commercial entities within the fossil fuel industry. This means that Australia’s energy policy does not reflect what climate science tells us is necessary for a safe climate. Australia’s environmental laws are insufficient to protect both nature and the environment. Environment and climate advocates have been urging the Australian government to strengthen these laws while industry, particularly the mining industry have been pushing to weaken them. This clearly demonstrates the strong intersection between commercial and political determinants of health.

Keywords

References

  1. Solar O, Irwin A. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice). Geneva: WHO; 2010.
  2. Gilmore AB, Fabbri A, Baum F, et al. Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health. Lancet. 2023;401(10383):1194-1213. doi:1016/s0140-6736(23)00013-2
  3. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). State of the Global Climate 2023. Geneva: WMO; 2024.
  4. Our World in Data. Monthly Average Surface Temperatures by Year, World. 2024. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/monthly-average-surface-temperatures-by-year. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  5. Oreskes N, Conway E, Karoly DJ, Gergis J, Neu U, Pfister C. The denial of global warming. In: White S, Pfister C, Mauelshagen F, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Climate History. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018:149-171. doi:1057/978-1-137-43020-5_14
  6. Supran G, Oreskes N. Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil's climate change communications. One Earth. 2021;4(5):696-719. doi:1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014
  7. Stutzer R, Rinscheid A, Oliveira TD, Loureiro PM, Kachi A, Duygan M. Black coal, thin ice: the discursive legitimisation of Australian coal in the age of climate change. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2021;8(1):178. doi:1057/s41599-021-00827-5
  8. Speers D. Just Two Years Ago, Peter Dutton Was Committed to a 2030 Emissions Target. So What's Changed? 2024. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-06-13/dutton-climate-2030-target-emissions-uturn/103970166. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  9. International Energy Agency (IEA). Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5°C Goal in Reach. Paris: IEA; 2023.
  10. Summary for policy makers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC; 2023.
  11. Environmental Justice Australia. Landmark Climate Court Cases to Protect Our Living Wonders from Coal and Gas. Living Wonders. 2024. https://livingwonders.org.au/. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  12. Baum F, McGreevy MP, MacDougall CM, Henley M. Energy as a social and commercial determinant of health: a qualitative study of Australian policy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7193. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.7193
  13. Sendall MC, Mutch A, Fitzgerald L. Political Determinants of Health in Australia: A Planetary Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge; 2024.
  14. Lock the Gate. Make a Submission: Time to Fix Australia’s National Environment Laws. 2024. https://www.lockthegate.org.au/epbcreforms?utm_campaign=sub_guide_epbc_reforms&utm_medium=email&utm_source=lockthegate. Accessed July 18, 2024.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 10 March 2025
  • First Publish Date: 11 March 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics