Commercialism, Holism, and Individual Responsibility; Comment on “Buying Health: The Costs of Commercialism and an Alternative Philosophy”

Document Type: Commentary

Author

LEFO, Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Churchill and Churchill’s editorial discusses negative (health) effects of commercialism in the provision of health care and nutrition. Three parts of their argument are commented: the claim that the fundamental problem of markets is the decomposition of the whole into parts (“reductionism”); the call for individual responsibility; and the notion of holism. On the three aspects the commentary concludes thus: Because provision of health and food must be controlled and managed in some form, an alternative to some kind of decomposition is hard to see. The call for individual responsibility is controversial due to its lack of attention to socioeconomic inequalities. The concept of “holism” is problematic due to its epistemological and normative status.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Churchill LR, Churchill SC. Buying health: the costs of commercialism and an alternative philosophy. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2013; 1: 91–3. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2013.14
2. Smith A. The wealth of nations. Punta Gorda: Bottom of the Hill Publishing; 2010
3. Wilkinson RG, Marmot MG. Social determinants of health: the solid facts. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
4. Marmot M. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet 2012; 380: 1011–29. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61228-8