1. Rothbard MN. For a New Liberty. New York: Macmillan; 1973. 2. Huebert J. Libertarianism Today.Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger; 2010.
3. Rothbard MN. Children and Rights. In: Rothbard MN, editor. The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press; 1998.
4. Gopnik A. How Babies Think. Sci Am2010; 303: 76–81. 5. Molyneux S. Spanking, Aggression and Ethics [internet]. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=es2d2c-YXeY
6. Molyneux S. Does Spanking Violate the Non-Aggression Principle? [internet]. 2012 July 21. Available from: http://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/33222-does-spanking-violate-the-nonaggression-principle/
7. Szasz TS. Law, liberty, and psychiatry; an inquiry into the social uses of mental health practices. New York: Macmillan; 1963. doi: 10.1037/11184-000
8. Szasz TS. The Lying Truths of Psychiatry. J Libert Stud1979; 3: 121–39.
10. Repacholi BM, Gopnik A. Early reasoning about desires: Evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. Dev Psychol1997; 33: 12–21.
11. Block WE. Terri Schiavo: A Libertarian Analysis. J Libert Stud 2011;22: 527–36.
12. Stout D. Judge Denies Custody to Mother of Switched Baby [internet]. 1999 November 13. Available from:http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/13/us/judge-denies-custody-to-mother-of-switchedbaby.html
13. National News Briefs. Mother to Seek Custody Of Girls Switched at Birth [internet].1999 April 7. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/07/us/national-news-briefs-mother-to-seek-custodyof-girls-switched-at-birth.html
14. Kinsella S. How We Come to Own Ourselves [internet].2006 September 7. Available from: http://mises.org/daily/2291
15. Block WE, William BI. Continuums. Journal Etica e Politica/Ethics & Politics 2008; 1: 151–66.
16. Benson BL. The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without the State. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy; 1990.
17. Hoppe H. Democracy - The God That Failed. Rutgers University, N.J.: Transaction Publishers; 2001.
18. Rothbard MN. Free Market, Police, Courts, and Law. Reason 1973; 5–19.
19. Rothbard M. On Denationalizing the Courts, Rothbard-Rockwell Report. Burlingame, CA: Center for Libertarian Studies; 1991.
20. Stringham E. Justice Without Government. J Libert Stud1998; 14: 53–77.
21. Liggio LP, Peden JR. Social scientists, schooling and the acculturation of immigrants in 19th century America. J Libert Stud 1978; 2: 69–84.
22. Madoc-Jones B, Coates J. An introduction to women’s studies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 1996.
23. King M. The Renaissance in Europe. London: Laurence King Publishing; 2003.
24. Griffiths J. The Riddle Of The Childscape. Penguin Books; 2013.
25. Bradford B. The Liberty Poll: Who We Are and What We Think. Liberty magazine1998; 1: 37–48.
26. Bradford B. The Liberty Poll: What libertarians believe is often at odds with libertarian orthodoxy. And their beliefs are changing in some surprising ways. Liberty magazine 1999; 13: 11–21.
27. Rand M. The Liberty Poll Results; Who We Are and What We Think. Liberty magazine2008; 22: 29–43.
28. Zwolinski M. What Do Libertarians Believe About the NonAggression Principle? [internet]. 2013 May 7. Available from: http://www.libertarianism.org/blog/what-do-libertarians-believeabout-non-aggression-principle
29. Block WE. Defending the Undefendable. Auburn, AL: The Mises Institute; 2008 .
30. Block WE. Libertarianism vs. Objectivism; A Response to Peter Schwartz. Reason Papers 2013; 26: 39–62.
31. Block WE, Fleischer M. How Would An Anarchist Society Handle Child Abuse? [internet]. 2010 October 13. Available from: http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block167.html
32. Block WE. Toward a Libertarian Theory of Inalienability: A Critique of Rothbard, Barnett, Gordon, Smith, Kinsella and Epstein. J Libert Stud 2003; 17: 39–85 .
34. Philmore J. The libertarian case for slavery. Philos Forum1984; 14: 43–58.
35. Block WE. Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights. Int J Soc Econ2004; 31: 275–86. doi: 10.1108/03068290410518256
36. Block WE. Homesteading, ad coelum, owning views and forestalling. The Social Sciences 2008; 3: 96–103.