Global Health Politics: Neither Solidarity nor Policy; Comment on “Globalization and the Diffusion of Ideas: Why We Should Acknowledge the Roots of Mainstream Ideas in Global Health”

Document Type : Commentary


1 Instituto de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile

2 Programa de Salud Global, Instituto de Salud Poblacional, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile


The global health agenda has been dominating the current global health policy debate. Furthermore, it has compelled countries to embrace strategies for tackling health inequalities in a wide range of public health areas. The article by Robert and colleagues highlights that although globalization has increased opportunities to share and spread ideas, there is still great asymmetry of power according to the countries’ economic and political development. It also emphasizes how policy diffusion from High Income Countries (HICs) to Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) have had flaws at understanding their political, economic, and cultural backgrounds while they are pursuing knowledge translation. Achieving a fair global health policy diffusion of ideas would imply a call for a renewal on political elites worldwide at coping global health politics. Accordingly, moving towards fairness in disseminating global health ideas should be driven by politics not only as one of the social determinants of health, but the main determinant of health and well-being among—and within—societies.


Main Subjects

1. Smith RD, MacKellar L. Global public goods and the global health agenda: problems, priorities and potential. Global Health 2007; 3: 9. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-3-9
2. United Nations. A renewed global partnership for development [internet]. 2013.Available from:
3. Robert E, Hajizadeh M, El-Bialy L, Bidisha SH. Globalization and the diffusion of ideas: why we should acknowledge the roots of mainstream ideas in global health. Int J Health Policy Manag 2014; 3: 7-9.  doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.55
4. Ruger JP. Global health governance as shared health governance. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012; 66: 653-61. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.101097
5. Ng NY, Ruger JP. Global health governance at a crossroads. Glob Health Gov 2011; 2: 1-37. doi: 10.4324/9780203157817
6. Haffeld J. Facilitative governance: transforming global health through complexity theory. Glob Public Health 2012; 7: 452-64. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2011.649486
7. Frenk J, Moon S. Governance challenges in global health. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 936-42. doi: 10.1056/nejmra1109339
8. Frenk J, Gómez-Dantés O, Moon S. From sovereignty to solidarity: a renewed concept of global health for an era of complex interdependence. Lancet 2014; 383: 94-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62561-1
9. Janes CR, Corbett KK. Anthropology and global health. Annu Rev Anthropol 2009; 38: 167-83.
10. Horton R. Global science and social movements: towards a rational politics of global health. Int Health 2009; 1: 26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.inhe.2009.06.003
11. Petter Ottersen O, Dasgupta J, Blouin C, Buss P, Chongsuvivatwong V, Frenk J, et al. The political origins of health inequality: prospects for change. Lancet 2014; 383: 630-67. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62407-1
12. Méndez CA. Achieving Universal Health Coverage: the global health political Quest. Rev Chil Salud Pública 2014; 15: 203-5.
13. Mamudu HM, Studlar DT. Multilevel governance and shared sovereignty: European Union, Member States, and the FCTC. Governance 2009; 22: 73-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.01422.x