Understanding Perception and Factors Influencing Private Voluntary Health Insurance Policy Subscription in the Lucknow Region

Document Type : Original Article


Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Silchar, Assam, India


Health insurance has been acknowledged by researchers as a valuable tool in health financing. In spite of its significance, a subscription paralysis has been observed in India for this product. People who can afford health insurance are also found to be either ignorant or aversive towards it. This study is designed to investigate into the socio-economic factors, individuals’ health insurance product perception and individuals’ personality traits for unbundling the paradox which inhibits people from subscribing to health insurance plans.
This survey was conducted in the region of Lucknow. An online questionnaire was sent to sampled respondents. Response evinced by 263 respondents was formed as a part of study for the further data analysis. For assessing the relationships between variables T-test and F-test were applied as a part of quantitative measuring tool. Finally, logistic regression technique was used to estimate the factors that influence respondents’ decision to purchase health insurance.
Age, dependent family members, medical expenditure, health status and individual’s product perception were found to be significantly associated with health insurance subscription in the region. Personality traits have also showed a positive relationship with respondent’s insurance status.
We found in our study that socio-economic factors, individuals’ product perception and personality traits induces health insurance policy subscription in the region.


Main Subjects

  1. Reddy KS, Selvaraj S, Rao KD, Chokshi M, Kumar P, Arora V, et al. A Critical Assesment of the Existing Health Insurance Models in India. Public Health Foundation of India; 2011.
  2. La Forgia G, Nagpal S. Government Sponsored Health Insurance in India: Are you covered? Washington, DC:The World Bank Publications; 2011. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9618-6
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Observatory Data Repository [internet]. 2014 [updated  June 2014; cited 2014 October 16]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.country.country-IND
  4. Dinodia Capital Advisors New Delhi. Indian Healthcare Industry 2012. [cited 2014 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.dinodiacapital.com/admin/upload/Indian-Healthcare-Industry-November-2012.pdf
  5. Rajeev A, Narang A. Emerging Trends in Health Insurance for Low-Income Groups. Econ Polit Wkly 2005; 40: 17-23.
  6. Sapelli C, Torche A. The Mandatory Health Insurance System in Chile: Explaining the Choice between Public and Private Insurance. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2001; 1: 97-110. doi: 10.1023/a:1012886810415
  7. Central Statistical Office. National Accounts Statistics. New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation Government of India; 2013.
  8. The Planning Commission, Government of India, Report of the Working Group on Savings during the Twelfth Five- Year Plan (2012) [Cited 2014 Nov 3]. Available from: http://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationReportDetails.aspx?ID=662
  9. Sinha T. An Analysis of the Evolution of Insurance in India. In: Cummins JD, Venard B, editors. Handbook of International Insurance. Springer US; 2007. p. 641-78.
  10. Mahal A. Assessing private health insurance in india-potential impacts and regulatory issues. Econ Polit Wkly 2002; 37: 559-71.
  11. Rao S. Health insurance concepts, issues and challenges. Econ Polit Wkly 2004; 39: 3835-44
  12. Gupta I. Private health insurance and health costs- results from a Delhi study. Econ Polit Wkly 2002; 37: 2795-02.
  13. Mcdonald EM, Shannon F, Edsall Kromm  E, Ma X, Pike M, Holtgrave D. Improvements in health behaviors and health status among newly insured members of an innovative health access plan. J Community Health 2012; 345: 1106-12. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9615-3
  14. Rosenman R, Wang HH. Perceived need and actual demand for health insurance among rural chinese residents. China Economic Review 2006; 18: 373-88. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2006.11.002
  15. Saver, Barry G and Doescher, Mark P. To buy, or not to buy, factors associated with the purchase of nongroup, private health insurance. Med Care 2000; 38: 141-51. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200002000-00004
  16. Lave J, Keane CR, Lin CJ, Ricci EM, Amersbach G, LaVallee CP. The impact of a children's health insurance program by age. Pediatrics 1999; 104: 1051-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.5.1051
  17. Monheit AC,  Vistnes JP. Health insurance enrollment decisions: preferences for coverage, worker sorting and insurance take-up. Inquiry 2008;  45: 153-67. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_45.02.153
  18. Hadley J. Sicker and poorer--the consequences of being uninsured: a review of the research on the relationship between health insurance, medical care use, health, work, and income. Med Care Res Rev 2003; 60: 3S-75S. doi: 10.1177/1077558703254101
  19. Blumberg LJ, Nichols LM, Banthin JS. Worker decisions to purchase health insurance. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2001; 1: 305-25.
  20. Boateng D, Awunyor-Vitor D. Health insurance in ghana:evaluation of policyholder's perception and fators influencing policy renewal in the Volta region. Int J Equity Health 2013; 12: 50. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-50
  21. Jovanovic Z, Lin CJ, Chang CC. Uninsured vs. insured population: variations among nonelderly Americans. J Health Soc Policy 2003; 17: 71-85. doi: 10.1300/j045v17n03_05
  22. Anderson RE. Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance. J Mark Res 1973; 10: 38-44. 
  23. Dodds WB, Monroe KB and Grewal D. Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. J Mark Res 1991; 28: 307-19.
  24. Lichtenstein DR, Ridgway NM, Netemeyer RG. Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: a field study. J Mark Res 1993; 30: 234-45.
  25. Chang TZ,  Wildt AR. Price, product information, and purchase intention: an empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1994. 22: 16-27. doi: 10.1177/0092070394221002
  26. Taylor SA, Baker TL. An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing 1994; 70: 163-78.doi: 10.1016/0022-4359(94)90013-2
  27. Cronin JJ Jr, Brady MK,  Hult GT. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing 2000; 76: 193-218. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00028-2
  28. Mulyanegara RC, Tsarenko Y, Anderson A. The big five and brand personality: investigating the impact of consumer personality on preferences towards particular brand personality. Journal of Brand Management 2009; 16: 234-47. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550093
  29. Lauriola M,  Levin IP. Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: an exploratory study. Pers Individ Dif 2001; 31: 215-26. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00130-6
  30. Lambert ZV. Price and choice behavior. J Mark Res 1972; 9: 35-40. doi: 10.2307/3149603
  31. McAdams DP. Personality, modernity, and the storied self: a contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychol Inq 1996; 7: 295-321. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1
  32. McAdams DP. The person: an integrated introduction to personality psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers; 2001.
  33. Insurance Regulatory Development Authority (IRDA). [cited 2014 August 28]. Available from:  http://www.irda.gov.in/ADMINCMS/cms/Uploadedfiles/IRDA_Health%20Insurance_%20Regulation%202012.pdf
  34. Baker DW, Sudano JJ, Albert JM, Borawski EA, Dor A. Lack of health insurance and decline in overall health in late middle age. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1106-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa002887
  35. Harmon C, Nolan  B. Health insurance and health services utilization in Ireland. Health Econ 2001; 10: 135-45. doi: 10.1002/hec.565
  36. Reschovsky JD, Kemper P, Tu H. Does type of health insurance affect health care use and assessments of care among the privately insured? Health Serv Res 2000; 35: 219-37.
  37. Showers VE, Shotick JA. The effects of household characteristics on demand for insurance: a tobit analysis . The Journal of Risk and Insurance 1994; 61: 492-502. doi: 10.2307/253572
  38. Jowett M, Contoyannis P, Vinh ND. The impact of public voluntary health insurance on private health expenditures in Vietnam. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 333-42.
  39. Krishnan TN. Hospitalisation insurance: a proposal. Econ Polit Wkly 1996; 31: 944-6.
  40. Xu K, Evans DB, Kawabata K, Zeramdini R, Klavus J, Murray CJ. Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet 2003; 362: 111-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13861-5
  41. Pauly MV. The economics of moral hazard: comment. Am Econ Rev 1968;  58: 531-7.
  42. Frank RG, Lamiraud K. Choice, price competetion and complexity in markets for health insurance. J Econ Behav Organ 2006; 72: 550-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.005
  43. Mohammed S, Sambo MN, Dong H. Understanding client satisfaction with a health insurance scheme in Nigeria: factors and enrollees experiences. Health Res Policy Syst 2011; 9: 20. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-20