Morality and Values in Support of Universal Healthcare Must be Enshrined in Law; Comment on “Morality and Markets in the NHS”

Document Type : Commentary


Queen Mary University of London, London, UK


This is a commentary on Gilbert and colleagues’ (1) paper on morality and markets in the National Health Service (NHS). Morality and values are not ephemeral qualities and universal healthcare is not simply an aspiration; it has to be enshrined in law. The creation of the UK NHS in 1948 was underpinned by core legal duties which required a system of public funding and delivery to follow. The moral values of the citizens in support of social solidarity were thus transformed into a political and legal contract for citizens. The NHS still survives in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland but the coalition government abolished it in England in 2012, reducing the NHS to a funding stream, a logo and a set of market regulators. This paper describes and explains the Health and Social Care (HSC) Act 2012 in England and how the NHS is withering away and health services are being remodeled along US Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) lines. There was nothing moral about this extraordinary act of savagery and violence against the public in England, and against common values and widely held beliefs in public ownership funding and provision of universal healthcare. The public health consequences will be catastrophic which is why after the election on May seventh a new Bill is required to Reinstate the NHS and the Secretary of  State’s legal duty to provide listed health services throughout England.


Main Subjects

  1. Gilbert B, Clarke E, Leaver E. Morality and Markets in the NHS. Int J Health Policy Manag 2014; 3: 371-6. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.123
  2. Katwala S. The NHS: even more cherished than the monarchy and the army [internet]. 14 January, 2013. Available from:            politics/2013/01/nhs-even-more-cherished-monarchy-and-army
  3. Pollock A, Price D. Duty to care: In defence of universal health care. Centre for Labour and Social Studies; 2013.
  4. Pollock A, Price D, Roderick P, Treuherz T. A flawed Bill with a hidden purpose. Lancet 2012; 379: 999. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60246-3
  5. Pollock A, Price D, Roderick P. Health and Social Care Bill 2011: a legal basis for charging and providing fewer health services to people in England. BMJ 2012; 344: e1729. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1729
  6. Webster C. The national health service: A political history.  2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  7. House of Commons. Independent Sector Treatment Centres: Fourth Report of Session 2005–06. London: The Stationery Office Limited; 2006. Available from:      cmselect/cmhealth/934/934i.pdf.
  8. Pollock AM. NHS plc: The Privatisation of Our Health Care. London: Verso; 2004.
  9. Geruso M. Identifying Upcoding in Markets with Adverse Selection: An Application to Medicare. Health & Healthcare in America: From Economics to Policy; 2014. Available from:
  10. Mays N, Dixon A and Jones L. Understanding new labour's market reforms of the English NHS. London: King's Fund; 2011.
  11. Pongpirul K. Hospital manipulations in the DRG system: a systematic scoping review. Asian Biomedicine  2013; 7: 301-10.
  12. Smith S, Saunders R, Stuckhardt L, McGinnis JM. Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.
  13. Institute of Medicine (IoM). Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America [internet]. 2012. Available from:  -to-Continuously-Learning-Health-Care-in-America.aspx