Two Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: Flaws in Alternatives to Fee-for-Service Payment Plans Do Not Mean Fee-for-Service Is a Good Solution to Rising Prices; Comment on “Fee-for-Service Payment - An Evil Practice That Must Be Stamped Out?”

Document Type : Commentary


Sociology Department, School of Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute (Wharton), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA


Professor Naoki Ikegami’s “Fee-for-service payment – an evil practice that must be stamped out” summarizes many of the failings of alternatives to fee-for-service (FFS) payment systems. His article also offers several suggestions for improving FFS systems. However, even powerful arguments against many of the alternatives to FFS, does not make a convincing argument for FFS systems. In addition, there are significant misunderstandings in Professor Ikegami’s presentation of and use of United States payment methods, the role of private vs. public insurance systems, and the increasing role of “accountable care organizations.”




Watch the Video Summary here



Main Subjects



  1. Ikegami N. Fee-for-service payment - an evil practice that must be stamped out? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(2):57-59. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.26
  2. Adams JL, Mehrotra A, William WT, McGlynn EA. Physician cost profiling — reliability and risk of misclassification. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1014-1021. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0906323
  3. Weinberger SE. Providing high-value, cost-conscious care: a critical seventh general competency for physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(6):386-388. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-6-201109200-00007
  4. US Government Accountability Office. Medicaid payment: comparisons of selected services under fee-for service, managed care, and private insurance. Accessed July, 2014.
  5. Evans M, Demko P. Medicare’s payment reform push draws praise and fears. Modern Healthcare. January 26, 2015.
  6. Diane R. Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM, Fisher ES Primary care and accountable care — two essential elements of delivery-system reform. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2301-2303. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0909327
  7. Koppel R, Lehmann CU. Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(2):465-471. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003023
  8. Caldwell N, Srebotnjak T, Wang T, Hsia R. “How much will i get charged for this?” Patient charges for top ten diagnoses in the emergency department. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55491. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055491
  9. Rosenthal E. The medical bill mystery. New York Times. May 2, 2015.
  10. Sinaiko AD, Rosenthal MB. Increased price transparency in health care — challenges and potential effects. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:891-894. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1100041
  11. Demko P. If fee-for-service is a problem, what’s the solution? Modern Healthcare. February 25, 2015.
  12. Japsen B. White house plans to shift Medicare away from fee-for-service; 50% of payments tied to quality by 2018. Forbes. January 26, 2015.       medicares-bolt-from-fee-for-service-means-50-percent-value-based-pay-by-2018/
  13. Colbert J, Kocot SL, Brenner R, Monterastelli M, Seidman J, White R. Adopting accountable care: an implementation guide for physician practices. Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at Brookings, Brookings Institute. November 19, 2014.       /2014/11/19-accountable-care-toolkit-physician-aco#recent_rr/