In Defense of Regulated Fee-for-Service Payment: A Response to Recent Commentaries

Document Type : Correspondence


Keio University, Tokyo, Japan


Main Subjects

In health policy, magic bullet answers tend to have more appeal than incremental adjustments. Politicians faced with the daunting issues in healthcare are eager to embrace new ideas promoted by academics and think tanks. However, in implementation, intrinsic flaws in design, such as the difficulty of finding physicians willing to be at risk for the costs of care, tend to be ignored… (Read more…)

  1. Introcaso D, Gaus C. Medicare’s rush to risk: Confounding theory and practice, leaving ACOs vulnerable. Published June 19, 2015.
  2. Ikegami N. Fee-for-service payment-an evil practice that must be stamped out? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4:57-59. doi:10.1517/ijhpm.2015.26
  3. Britton JR. Healthcare reimbursement and quality improvement: Integration using the electronic medical record. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4:forthcoming. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.93
  4. Koppel R. Two wrongs do not make a right: flaws in alternatives to fee-for-service payment plans do not mean fee-for-service is a good solution to rising prices. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4: forthcoming. doi:10.1517/ijhpm.2015.94
  5. Ikegami N. Universal Health Coverage for Inclusive and Sustainable Development Lessons from Japan.
    . Published September 25, 2014.