It Is Not That Simple nor Compelling!; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”

Document Type : Commentary


School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia


Healthcare decisions are often made under pressure, with varying levels of information in a changing clinical context. With limited resources and a focus on improving patient outcomes, healthcare managers and health professionals strive to implement both clinical and cost-effective care. However, the gap between research evidence and health policy/clinical practice persists despite our best efforts. In an attempt to close the gap through behaviour change interventions, there has been a strong held belief that ‘more is better,’ without understanding the mechanisms and circumstances of knowledge translation (KT). We argue that even a singleintervention or strategy in translating evidence into healthcare policy or practice is rarely simple to implement. Nor is the evidence compelling on the best approach. As Harvey and Kitson argued, designing and evaluating KT interventions requires flexibility and responsiveness. If we are to move forward in translation science then we need to use rigorous designs such as randomised controlled trials to test effectiveness of interventions or strategies with embedded process evaluations to understand the reason interventions do or do not work!


Main Subjects

  1. Greenhalgh T, Wieringa S. Is it time to drop the the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review. J R Soc Med.. 2011;104(12):501-509. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2011.110285
  2. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-50
  3. Steinberg E, Greenfield S, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Graham R. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust: National Academies Press; 2011.
  4. Squires JE, Sullivan K, Eccles MP, Worswick J, Grimshaw JM. Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component interventions in changing health-care professionals' behaviours? An overview of systematic reviews. Implement Sci. 2015;9:152. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0152-6
  5. Harvey G, Kitson A. Translating evidence into healthcare policy and practice: single versus multi-faceted implementation strategies - is there a simple answer to a complex question? . Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(3):123-126. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.54
  6. Bucknall T. Carrots, sticks and sermons: is feedback the answer to changing clinicians' behavior? Worldviews Evidence Based Nursing. 2007;4(4):177-178. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00103.x
  7. Seers K, Cox K, Crichton NJ, et al. FIRE (Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence): a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2012;7:25. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-25
  8. Carlile PR. Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ Sci. 2004;15(5):555-568. doi:10.2307/30034757
  9. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J. 2000;321(7262):694-696. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694
  10. Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):257-265. doi:10.1177/1090198113486805
  11. Locock L, Bucknall T, Titler MG. Prescribing organizational change–what works for whom? Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(4):203-205. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2004.04080.x
  12. Gueron J. The politics of random assignment: implementing studies and affecting policy. In: Mosteller F, Boruch R, eds. Evidence Matters: Randomized Trials in Education Research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2002:15-29.
  13. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(2):119-127. doi:10.1136/jech.56.2.119
  14. Meyers D, Durlak J, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3-4):462-480. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x
  15. Rycroft-Malone J, Fontenla M, Bick D, Seers K. A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care. Implement Sci. 2010;5:38. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-38