How Can a Global Social Support System Hope to Achieve Fairer Competiveness?; Comment on “A Global Social Support System: What the International Community Could Learn From the United States’ National Basketball Association”

Document Type : Commentary


UCL Institute of Health Equity, UCL Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK


Ooms et al sets out some good general principles for a global social support system to improve fairer global competitiveness as a result of redistribution. This commentary sets out to summarize some of the conditions that would need to be satisfied for it to level up gradients in inequality through such a social support system, using the National Basketball Association (NBA) example as a point of reference. From this, the minimal conditions are described that would be required for the support system, proposed in the article by Ooms et al, to succeed.


Main Subjects

  1. Ooms G, Stuckler D, Basu S, McKee M, A global social support system: what the international community could learn from the United States’ National Basketball Association’s scheme for redistribution of new talent. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(11):715-718. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.126
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Review of social determinants and the health divide in the WHO European Region: Final Report. Copenhagen; 2013.
  3. Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  4. Ottersen OP, Dasgupta J, Blouin C, et al. The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change. Lancet. 2014;383(9917):630-667. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62407-1
  5. Lundberg O, Åberg Yngwe M, Bergqvist K, Sjöberg O. DRIVERS final scientific report: the role of income and social protection for inequalities in health, evidence and policy implications. Report produced as part of the ‘DRIVERS for Health Equity’ project. Stockholm: Centre for Health Equity Studies; 2014.
  6. Labonte R. Liberalisation, health and the World Trade Organisation.  J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:620-621. doi:10.1136/jech.55.9.620
  7. Clay E J, Geddes M, Natali L. Untying Aid: Is it working? An Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration and of the 2001 DAC Recommendation of Untying ODA to the LDCs. Copenhagen: December Danish Institute for International Studies; 2009
  8. South Centre Elements for the architecture of aid for trade. Analytic note SC/AN/TDP/AFT. April 1, 2006.
  9. South Centre Comments on the 3rd high level forum on aid effectiveness’ final draft of the Accra Agenda for action (AAA). Analytic note SC/GGDP/AN/GEG/ 6 rev. August 3, 2008.
  10. South Centre Global value chains (GVCs) from a development perspective. Analytic series SC/TDP/AN. July 2013.
  11. Schafferhof M, Suzuki E, Angelides P, Hoffman S. Rethinking the global health system. Royal Institute of International affairs; 2015.
  12. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Aid effectiveness 2011: Progress in implementing the Paris Declaration. Better Aid, OECD; 2012.
  13. Macro International. The Five-Year Evaluation of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria 2009.
  14. Ramalingam B. Aid on the Edge of Chaos: Rethinking International Cooperation in a Complex World. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
  15. World Bank GNI per capita. World Development Indicators database – population. Published September 2015.
  16. World Bank GNI per capita. World Development Indicators database – national income. Published September 2015.
  17. Bell R, Grobicki L, Hamelmann C. Addressing social, economic and environmental determinants of health and the health divide in the context of sustainable human development. UNDP; 2014.