We Need Action on Social Determinants of Health – but Do We Want It, too?; Comment on “Understanding the Role of Public Administration in Implementing Action on the Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequities”

Document Type : Commentary


1 Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation (CHETRE), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2 South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia

3 Ingham Institute, Liverpool, NSW, Australia


Recently a number of calls have been made to mobilise the arsenal of political science insights to investigate – and point to improvements in – the social determinants of health (SDH), and health equity. Recently, in this journal, such a rallying appeal was made for the field of public administration. This commentary argues that, although scholarly potential should justifiably be redirected to resolve these critical issues for humanity, a key ingredient in taking action may have been neglected. This factor is ‘community.’ Community health has been a standard element of the public health and health promotion, even political, repertoire for decades now. But this commentary claims that communities are insufficiently charged, equipped or appreciated to play the role that scholarship attributes (or occasionally avoids to identify) to them. Community is too important to not fully engage and understand. Rhetorical tools and inquiries can support their quintessential role.


Main Subjects

  1. Carey G, Friel S. Understanding the role of public administration in implementing action on the social determinants of health and health inequities. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(12):795-799. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.185
  2. de Leeuw E, Clavier C, Breton E. Health policy–why research it and how: health political science. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:55. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-12-55
  3. Crammond BR, Carey G. (2016) Policy change for the social determinants of health: the strange irrelevance of social epidemiology. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 2016. doi:10.1332/174426416X14538920677201
  4. Tang KC, Ståhl T, Bettcher D, De Leeuw E. The Eighth Global Conference on Health Promotion: health in all policies: from rhetoric to action. Health Promot Int. 2014;9(suppl 1): i1-i8. doi:10.1093/heapro/dau051
  5. Carey G, Malbon E, Crammond B, Pescud M, Baker P. Can the sociology of social problems help us to understand and manage ‘lifestyle drift’?. Health Promot Int. 2016. pii: dav116. doi:10.1093/heapro/dav116
  6. Blas E, Gilson L, Kelly MP, et al. Addressing social determinants of health inequities: what can the state and civil society do? Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1684-1689. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61693-1
  7. Kretzmann JP,  McKnight JL. Building communities from the inside out: a path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research; 1993.
  8. Page-Adams D, Sherraden M. Asset building as a community revitalization strategy. Social Work. 1997;42(5):423-434. doi:10.1093/sw/42.5.423
  9. Wilkinson R, Pickett K. The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. UK, Penguin; 2010.
  10. Friedli L. ‘What we’ve tried, hasn’t worked’: the politics of assets based public health. Crit Public Health 2013;23(2):131-145.
  11. Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, et al. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:725.  doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1
  12. Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21(1):369-402
  13. Bhatnagar D, Rathore A, Torres MM, Kanungo P. Participatory Budgeting in Brazil. Washington DC: World Bank; 2004. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/14657_Partic-Budg-Brazil-web.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2015
  14. Fung A. Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Adm Rev. 2015;75(4):513-522.
  15. de Leeuw E. Intersectoral action, policy and governance in European Healthy Cities. Public Health Panorama. 2015;1(2):175-182.
  16. Crawshaw P, Bunton R, Gillen K. Health action zones and the problem of community. Health Soc Care Community. 2003;11(1):36-44.
  17. Jessop B. Governance failure. In: Stoker G, ed. The New Politics of Local Governance in Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press; 2000:11-32.
  18. Puttnam R. The prosperous community. Am Prospect. 19934(13):21
  19. Labonte R. Laverack G. Capacity building in health promotion: for whom and for what purpose? Crit Public Health. 2001;11(2):111-128.
  20. Milton B, Attree P, French B, Povall S, Whitehead M, Popay J. The impact of community engagement on health and social outcomes: a systematic review. Community Development Journal. 2011. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsr043
  21. Popay J. Community Engagement, Community Development and Health Improvement. Lancaster: Lancaster University; 2006.
  22. Commers M. Determinants of health: theory, understanding, portrayal, policy (Vol. 13). Springer Science & Business Media; 2002.
  23. Putland C, Baum FE, Ziersch AM. From causes to solutions - insights from lay knowledge about health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:67. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-67
  24. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Carger E, Westen D. A New Way to Talk about the Social Determinants of Health. Princeton: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2010. http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2010/01/a-new-way-to-talk-about-the-social-determinants-of-health.html. Accessed February 24, 2016.
  25. Schön DA, Rein M. Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books; 1995.
  26. Stone D. Policy paradox. The art of political decision making (Revised edition). New York: WW Norton & Company; 2002.
  27. de Leeuw E, Peters D. Nine questions to guide development and implementation of health in all policies. Health Promot Int. 2015;30(4):987-997.